First State Bancorporation (NASDAQ:FSNM):
OVERVIEW:
-
Total deposits increased $140.3 million, improving liquidity.
-
Loans decreased $119.7 million.
-
Net interest margin decreased to 2.56% for the quarter.
-
Total non-performing loans increased $28.5 million.
-
Potential problem loans decline for third consecutive quarter.
-
First Community Bank remains "adequately capitalized.”
-
$95.6 million of allowance excluded from regulatory capital.
-
Exposure to construction, development and land loans down
approximately 40% since 12/31/07.
First State Bancorporation ("First State”) (NASDAQ:FSNM) today announced
a first quarter 2010 loss of $15.7 million, or $(0.75) per diluted
share, compared to a loss of $24.4 million or $(1.19) per diluted share
for the same period in 2009. The net loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 resulted primarily from the level of provision for loan
losses due to the level of non-performing assets and charge-offs and
write-downs of other real estate owned.
"Although non-performing loans are up slightly in the first quarter, we
are pleased to report that total classified loans remained stable for a
third straight quarter and potential problem loans continue to decline,”
stated H. Patrick Dee, President and Chief Executive Officer. "We
continue to aggressively reduce our exposure to the construction,
development, and land loans that have been the source of the majority of
our problem loans. We are also encouraged by the increase in deposits in
what has historically been a difficult quarter for deposit generation,”
continued Dee.
In June 2009, we completed the sale of the Colorado branches,
transferring approximately $387 million in loans, $512 million in
deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and $20
million of premises and equipment and other assets. At March 31, 2009,
these items were reclassified as available for sale.
|
INCOME STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS:
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited-$ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
First Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
27,016
|
|
$
|
41,230
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,633
|
|
|
14,878
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
17,383
|
|
|
26,352
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(16,200)
|
|
|
(33,300)
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
(6,948)
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
6,783
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
23,629
|
|
|
27,059
|
|
(Loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(15,663)
|
|
|
(24,373)
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15,663)
|
|
$
|
(24,373)
|
|
Basic (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.75)
|
|
$
|
(1.19)
|
|
Diluted (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.75)
|
|
$
|
(1.19)
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,767,850
|
|
|
20,468,411
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,767,850
|
|
|
20,468,411
|
|
FINANCIAL RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
(2.25)%
|
|
(2.88)%
|
|
Return on average equity
|
|
(141.35)%
|
|
(63.69)%
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
97.78%
|
|
75.19%
|
|
Operating expenses to average assets
|
|
3.39%
|
|
3.20%
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
2.56%
|
|
3.27%
|
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
1.59%
|
|
4.51%
|
|
Leverage ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
1.28%
|
|
4.88%
|
|
Bank Subsidiary
|
|
4.47%
|
|
6.48%
|
|
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
3.86%
|
|
8.90%
|
|
Bank Subsidiary
|
|
8.03%
|
|
9.02%
|
|
BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited – $ in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$ Change from December 31, 2009
|
|
$ Change from March 31, 2009
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$2,862,080
|
|
$2,744,395
|
|
$3,549,825
|
|
$117,685
|
|
$(687,745)
|
|
Total loans
|
|
1,897,944
|
|
2,017,690
|
|
2,704,048
|
|
(119,746)
|
|
(806,104)
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds sold
|
|
263,167
|
|
105,082
|
|
181,448
|
|
158,085
|
|
81,719
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
644,546
|
|
562,124
|
|
506,326
|
|
82,422
|
|
138,220
|
|
Deposits
|
|
2,174,605
|
|
2,034,328
|
|
2,727,169
|
|
140,277
|
|
(552,564)
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
364,540
|
|
350,704
|
|
497,226
|
|
13,836
|
|
(132,686)
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
1,810,065
|
|
1,683,624
|
|
2,229,943
|
|
126,441
|
|
(419,878)
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
594,669
|
|
595,365
|
|
597,400
|
|
(696)
|
|
(2,731)
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
32,612
|
|
47,031
|
|
135,301
|
|
(14,419)
|
|
(102,689)
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$1.57
|
|
$2.27
|
|
$6.59
|
|
$(0.70)
|
|
$(5.02)
|
|
Tangible book value per share
|
|
$1.32
|
|
$2.01
|
|
$5.86
|
|
$(0.69)
|
|
$(4.54)
|
Net interest income was $17.4 million for the first quarter of 2010
compared to $26.4 million for the same quarter of 2009. Our net interest
margin was 2.56% and 3.27% for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Net Interest Margin
The decrease in the net interest margin is primarily due to the increase
in non-performing assets, the repositioning of the investment portfolio,
and the increased level of interest bearing cash which has occurred over
the last twelve months.
The increase in non-performing loans has continued to put pressure on
our net interest margin. The margin compression is a direct result of
reversals of accrued interest on loans moving to non-accrual status
during the period as well as the inability to accrue interest on the
respective loan going forward, ultimately resulting in an earning asset
with a zero yield. The level of non-accrual loans has increased to $286
million at the end of March 2010 from $164 million at the end of March
2009. Non-accrual loans currently make up 10.2% of interest earning
assets compared to 4.8% a year ago.
The repositioning of the investment portfolio has also contributed to
the margin compression as we have sold a significant portion of the
investment portfolio with higher yields over the last twelve months in
order to monetize gains in the investment portfolio. We have replaced
the investments sold with GNMA investments which are 0% risk weighted
for regulatory capital purposes, but are at lower yields as we continue
to focus on shorter average life investments in anticipation of rates
increasing over the next 12 to 24 months. In addition, during the third
quarter of 2009 we classified two Colorado metropolitan municipal
district bonds totaling $18.8 million as non-accrual investment
securities due to the status of the developments and related uncertainty
of the cash flows.
The increased level of interest bearing cash is the result of improving
our cash liquidity position in the current banking environment; however,
it negatively impacts our margin. In order to generate additional cash
liquidity in the first quarter of 2009, we issued additional brokered
deposits and borrowed additional funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank
("FHLB”), resulting in an increase in lower yielding cash on the balance
sheet. This strategy increased our cash liquidity and at the same time
resulted in further margin compression by increasing our earning asset
base with lower yielding assets and contributing to an increase in
interest expense. Management continues to believe it is prudent to
operate with the higher levels of excess cash in the near term. In
addition, during the first quarter of 2010 we began to focus our efforts
on generating deposits outside of our normal market areas of New Mexico
and Arizona through the use of two deposit listing services due to our
inability to issue brokered deposits. We have focused on maturities of
12 to 24 months for these out of market certificates of deposit with
$159 million generated during the quarter.
The rates paid on customer deposits also impact the margin and are
influenced more by competition in our markets and tend to lag behind
Federal Reserve Bank action in both timing and magnitude, particularly
in this very low rate environment. Although we have lowered selected
deposit rates since the beginning of 2009 and are restricted to the
rates we can pay as an "adequately capitalized” institution, we continue
to remain competitive in the markets we serve.
The extent of future changes in our net interest margin will depend on
the amount and timing of any Federal Reserve rate changes, our overall
liquidity position, our non-performing asset levels, our ability to
manage the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and our ability to stay
competitive in the markets we serve.
Liquidity
Our liquidity position consists of excess cash liquidity and several
other liquidity sources. The cash liquidity at March 31, 2010 of
approximately $263 million is made up of excess investable cash on the
balance sheet including interest-bearing deposits with other banks and
federal funds sold. Our other liquidity sources include two borrowing
lines for a total capacity of approximately $91 million, fully
collateralized by investment securities and commercial loans,
approximately $143 million of unpledged investments, and $8 million of
redeemable bank owned life insurance policies. Our total liquidity
position during the first quarter increased $291 million compared to the
fourth quarter of 2009 and continues to evolve based on the operations
of the Bank. The increase in total liquidity is attributable to $159
million in out of market certificates of deposit generated through
deposit listing services, continued runoff in the loan portfolio
including loan payoffs and loan amortization, traditional deposit growth
of $25 million, receipt of $26 million of federal tax refunds, and an
increase in public customers in the FDIC Transaction Account Guarantee
(TAG) program which results in the release of pledged investment
securities. The increases were offset by a decline in brokered deposits
including CDARS reciprocal maturities of $43 million during the first
quarter.
We continue to focus our attention on the overall liquidity position of
First Community Bank ("the Bank”) due to the current economic
environment and capital structure of the Bank with particular focus on
the level of cash liquidity along with monitoring the other liquidity
sources available to us including borrowing lines (fully secured by
securities or loan collateral) and other assets that can be monetized
including the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance. The
Bank’s most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and marketable
investment securities that are not pledged as collateral. The levels of
these assets are dependent on operating, financing, lending, and
investing activities during any given period. We continue to accumulate
and maintain excess cash liquidity from loan reductions and increases in
deposits to compensate for the limited liquidity options currently
available.
The Bank currently has $126 million in brokered deposits including CDARS
reciprocal which will mature in 2010 of which $66 million mature in the
next 90 days. The Bank has maintained significant levels in overnight
investments, which combined with normal expected repayments of loans
outstanding, should provide adequate cash liquidity required to redeem
these brokered deposits at maturity.
We also paid off $105 million in FHLB borrowings during April of 2010
due to the level of excess cash accumulated to date, which decreased our
exposure to the FHLB by approximately 20%. As of March 31, 2010, these
FHLB borrowings were collateralized by investment securities,
approximately 80% of which were released back to the Bank as the
borrowings were paid off.
In addition, the Bank is a participating institution in the TAG program
for which the FDIC recently approved an Interim Rule extending the
expiration of the program from June 30, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The
TAG program provides our deposit customers in non-interest bearing and
interest-bearing NOW accounts paying fifty basis points or less
(twenty-five basis points or less beginning July 1st) full
FDIC insurance for an unlimited amount.
"The increase in deposits during the quarter in addition to the steady
repayment of loans and the receipt of our federal tax refunds has
significantly improved our liquidity position during the quarter,”
stated Christopher C. Spencer, Chief Financial Officer.
Management currently anticipates that our cash and cash equivalents,
expected cash flows from operations, and borrowing capacity will be
sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for working
capital, loan originations, capital expenditures, and other obligations
for at least the next twelve months.
Capital Adequacy and Regulatory Matters
Consistent with December 31, 2009, the Bank remains "adequately
capitalized” while the Company remains "undercapitalized.” The Bank is
subject to the prompt supervisory and regulatory actions pursuant to the
FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, prohibiting us from accepting, renewing,
or rolling over brokered deposits except with a waiver from the FDIC and
imposing restrictions on the interest rates that can be paid on
deposits. The Bank is not currently seeking a waiver from the FDIC.
In the event that our deposit generation is negatively impacted by the
continued classification of the Bank as "adequately capitalized” or if
the Bank drops to "undercapitalized,” management believes that
sufficient cash and liquid assets are on hand to maintain operations and
meet all obligations as they come due. The substantial erosion of the
Bank’s capital position and the continued deterioration of the loan
portfolio makes it unlikely that the Bank will be able to maintain its
"adequately capitalized” status under regulatory guidelines without
raising additional capital, a strategic merger, selling a significant
amount of assets, obtaining government assistance, or some combination
thereof. If the Bank were to fall below adequately capitalized, the Bank
could be subject to Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) measures of the FDIC
which would further restrict the interest rates we pay on deposits
making it difficult to remain competitive. Although we do not believe we
currently have the ability to raise new capital through a public
offering at an acceptable price, we continue to work with our investment
bankers to evaluate alternative capital strengthening strategies, and
are currently working on other initiatives to strengthen our capital
position including the possibility of entering into a business
combination with a strategic partner or a transaction with a private
equity group. However, there can be no assurance that the review of
strategic alternatives will result in the pursuit of any particular
strategy or that any such transaction or strategy will be completed. In
accordance with our regulatory agreement, capital plans for First State
and the Bank were submitted timely, but have not been accepted by the
regulators due to uncertainty of our ability to execute the plans. We
continue to work toward full compliance with the requirements of the
capital plans. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able
to comply fully with the provisions of the regulatory agreement, or that
efforts to comply with the regulatory agreement will not have adverse
effects on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
Balance beginning of period
|
|
$
|
129,222
|
|
$
|
79,707
|
|
$
|
79,707
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
162,600
|
|
|
33,300
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(25,211)
|
|
|
(105,338)
|
|
|
(13,261)
|
|
Allowance related to loans available for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(7,747)
|
|
|
(8,469)
|
|
Balance end of period
|
|
$
|
120,211
|
|
$
|
129,222
|
|
$
|
91,277
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for investment
|
|
|
6.36%
|
|
|
6.45%
|
|
|
4.01%
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
42.00%
|
|
|
50.15%
|
|
|
55.80%
|
|
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
Accruing loans – 90 days past due
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Non-accrual loans
|
|
|
285,984
|
|
|
257,689
|
|
|
163,585
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
286,231
|
|
$
|
257,689
|
|
$
|
163,587
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
52,471
|
|
|
46,503
|
|
|
17,754
|
|
Non-accrual investment securities
|
|
|
18,775
|
|
|
18,775
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
357,477
|
|
$
|
322,967
|
|
$
|
181,341
|
|
Potential problem loans
|
|
$
|
168,929
|
|
$
|
173,003
|
|
$
|
246,200
|
|
Total non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
12.49%
|
|
|
11.77%
|
|
|
5.11%
|
The allowance is based on management’s current evaluation and provides
for probable inherent losses in the portfolio, trends in delinquencies,
charge-off experience, and local and national economic conditions. First
State’s provision for loan losses was $16.2 million for the first
quarter of 2010 compared to $33.3 million for the same quarter of 2009.
The allowance for loan losses was 6.36% and 4.01% of total loans held
for investment at March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
Non-performing loans increased by $28.5 million in the first quarter of
2010 which compares to increases of $45.3 million, $47.7 million, $17.3
million, and $29.1 million in the first, second, third and fourth
quarters of 2009, respectively. Potential problem loans declined for the
third quarter in a row decreasing by $4.1 million from December 31, 2009
and $77.3 million from March 31, 2009. Potential problem assets are
defined as loans presently accruing interest, and not contractually past
due 90 days or more and not restructured, but about which management has
doubt as to the future ability of the borrower to comply with present
repayment terms, which may result in the reporting of the loans as
non-performing assets in the future. Net charge-offs totaled $25.2
million for the first quarter of 2010, as we continued to charge off all
specific reserves that have been determined to be collateral dependent.
During the recent economic downturn, the majority of our loan losses are
attributable to construction, residential development, and vacant land
loans. For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, $17.4 million of the $25.2
million in net charge-offs, or 69.0%, were related to construction,
residential development, and vacant land loans. For the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, construction, residential development, and
vacant land loans accounted for 76.8% and 58.1% of net charge-offs,
respectively. For the period from January 1, 2008 through March 31,
2010, construction, residential development, and vacant land loan
balances have declined by approximately $380 million, including
charge-offs of $112.0 million, from $931.0 million at the end of 2007 to
$551.3 million at March 31, 2010, a decrease of approximately 40%.
Other real estate owned increased approximately $6.0 million compared to
December 31, 2009, and $34.7 million compared to March 31, 2009. We
continue to be successful in disposing of real estate after gaining
control of the properties. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we
took title to properties totaling $24.0 million and disposed of
properties with a carrying value of $15.8 million. Other real estate
owned at March 31, 2010 includes $49.0 million in foreclosed or
repossessed assets, and $3.5 million in facilities and vacant land
listed for sale.
Non-accrual investment securities include 30 year municipal utility
district bonds related to two residential housing developments in the
Denver, Colorado metropolitan area which are not current on debt
service. The terms of the agreements allow the districts to defer
interest in the case where available funds from development of the
district are not sufficient to cover the debt service. Due to the status
of the developments and related uncertainty of the timing of the cash
flows, we have classified these investments as non-accrual.
"Our aggressive approach of dealing with other real estate owned is
enabling us to move properties fairly quickly and minimize the overall
increase in the portfolio despite an increase in the number of
properties that migrated in during the quarter,” commented Mr. Dee.
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Service charges
|
|
$
|
2,766
|
|
$
|
3,763
|
|
$
|
(997
|
)
|
|
(27
|
)%
|
|
Credit and debit card transaction fees
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
Gain on investment securities
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
(792
|
)
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,783
|
|
$
|
9,634
|
|
$
|
(2,851
|
)
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
The decrease in service charges on deposit accounts is primarily due to
the completion of the sale of the Colorado branches on June 26, 2009.
During the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, certain securities were sold
at a gain as part of our continued efforts to bolster capital.
The decrease in gain on sale of loans is primarily due to decreased
volumes of sales of residential mortgage loans. During the first quarter
of 2010, we sold approximately $31 million in loans compared to
approximately $103 million during the same period in 2009. The decline
in volume is primarily due to the closure of the Colorado mortgage
operations in conjunction with the Colorado branch sale and, to a lesser
extent, to the continued sluggish housing market.
The decrease in other non-interest income is primarily due to a decrease
in bank owned life insurance income of approximately $342,000. In
September 2009, we surrendered bank owned life insurance policies with a
current value of approximately $36 million for liquidity and risk-based
capital purposes.
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
7,405
|
|
$
|
11,522
|
|
$
|
(4,117)
|
|
(36)
|
%
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
(991)
|
|
(26)
|
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
(257)
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
(705)
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
Legal, accounting, and consulting
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
(447)
|
|
(33)
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
(430)
|
|
(65)
|
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
(32)
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
4,487
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
3,527
|
|
367
|
|
|
FDIC insurance premiums
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
374
|
|
25
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
(341)
|
|
(57)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,884
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,629
|
|
$
|
27,059
|
|
$
|
(3,430)
|
|
(13)
|
%
|
The decrease in salaries and benefits is primarily due to a decrease in
headcount. At March 31, 2010, full time equivalent employees totaled
506, compared to 775 at March 31, 2009. The sale of the Colorado
branches and the related closure of the Colorado mortgage division
accounted for a headcount reduction of 193. The decrease is also due to
lower mortgage commissions as a result of reduced volume in mortgage
loans originated for sale.
The decrease in occupancy is primarily due to a decrease in building
depreciation expense, leasehold amortization, and rent and related
expenses due to the sale of the Colorado branches and the Colorado
mortgage division closure.
The decrease in equipment is primarily due to the decrease in
depreciation expense on equipment and a decrease in equipment rental and
associated costs due to the sale of the Colorado branches and the
Colorado mortgage division closure.
The decrease in legal, accounting, and consulting expense is primarily
due to expenses incurred in the first quarter of 2009 related to the
sale of the Colorado branches that did not recur in 2010.
The decrease in marketing expenses is primarily due to a decrease in
direct advertising and Bank sponsorships and contributions resulting
from our expense reduction initiative.
The increase in other real estate owned expense is primarily due to an
increase in write-downs of properties to reflect their fair values, an
increase in losses on sales of properties, and an increase in taxes and
insurance incurred on the larger portfolio of properties.
The increase in FDIC insurance premiums is due to higher FDIC assessment
rates as well as changes in our deposit mix. In February 2009, the FDIC
adopted an additional final rule which included an additional uniform
two basis point increase as well as other adjustments that took effect
on April 1, 2009. The premiums have also been impacted by an additional
assessment on balances in the TAG program which have grown to
approximately $330 million at March 31, 2010.
The decrease in amortization of intangibles is due to the sale of the
Colorado branches on June 26, 2009.
There was no income tax expense for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and March 31, 2009 as the net operating loss and other net deferred
tax assets are fully offset by a deferred tax valuation allowance.
In conjunction with its first quarter earnings release, First State will
host a conference call to discuss these results, which will be simulcast
over the Internet on Monday, April 26, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
To listen to the call and view the slide presentation, visit www.fcbnm.com,
Investor Relations. The conference call will be available for replay
beginning April 26, 2010 through May 6, 2010 at www.fcbnm.com,
Investor Relations.
First State Bancorporation is a New Mexico based commercial bank holding
company (NASDAQ:FSNM). First State provides services, through its
subsidiary First Community Bank, to customers from a total of 40
branches located in New Mexico and Arizona. On Friday, April 23, 2010,
First State’s stock closed at $1.29 per share.
The following table provides selected information for average balances
and average yields for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and March 31,
2009:
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES:
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
1,966,912
|
|
4.69%
|
|
$
|
2,738,421
|
|
5.32%
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
606,653
|
|
2.77%
|
|
|
477,809
|
|
4.48%
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds sold
|
|
|
184,448
|
|
0.26%
|
|
|
50,397
|
|
0.31%
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
2,758,013
|
|
3.97%
|
|
|
3,266,627
|
|
5.12%
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,754,452
|
|
1.58%
|
|
|
2,127,701
|
|
2.28%
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
2,389,542
|
|
1.63%
|
|
|
2,787,462
|
|
2.16%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest-bearing demand accounts
|
|
|
364,131
|
|
|
|
|
461,007
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
44,941
|
|
|
|
|
154,707
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,823,650
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,426,646
|
|
|
The following tables provide information regarding loans and deposits
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the year ended
December 31, 2009:
|
LOANS: (Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
247,194
|
|
13.0%
|
|
|
$
|
259,353
|
|
12.8%
|
|
|
$
|
342,963
|
|
12.7%
|
|
Real estate – commercial
|
|
|
889,777
|
|
46.9%
|
|
|
|
883,598
|
|
43.8%
|
|
|
|
1,146,975
|
|
42.5%
|
|
Real estate – one- to four-family
|
|
|
175,716
|
|
9.3%
|
|
|
|
187,085
|
|
9.3%
|
|
|
|
270,114
|
|
10.0%
|
|
Real estate – construction
|
|
|
551,251
|
|
29.0%
|
|
|
|
645,280
|
|
32.0%
|
|
|
|
882,733
|
|
32.6%
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
25,012
|
|
1.3%
|
|
|
|
28,202
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
|
38,732
|
|
1.4%
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
8,994
|
|
0.5%
|
|
|
|
14,172
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
22,531
|
|
0.8%
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,897,944
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
2,017,690
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
2,704,048
|
|
100.0%
|
|
DEPOSITS: (Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
Non-interest bearing
|
|
$
|
364,540
|
|
16.8%
|
|
|
$
|
350,704
|
|
17.2%
|
|
|
$
|
497,226
|
|
18.2%
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
357,784
|
|
16.5%
|
|
|
|
353,705
|
|
17.4%
|
|
|
|
302,056
|
|
11.1%
|
|
Money market savings accounts
|
|
|
366,073
|
|
16.8%
|
|
|
|
381,566
|
|
18.8%
|
|
|
|
562,060
|
|
20.6%
|
|
Regular savings
|
|
|
90,534
|
|
4.2%
|
|
|
|
88,044
|
|
4.3%
|
|
|
|
103,952
|
|
3.8%
|
|
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
|
|
|
236,474
|
|
10.9%
|
|
|
|
232,852
|
|
11.5%
|
|
|
|
328,136
|
|
12.0%
|
|
Certificates of deposit greater than $100,000
|
|
|
600,756
|
|
27.5%
|
|
|
|
425,739
|
|
20.9%
|
|
|
|
485,527
|
|
17.9%
|
|
CDARS Reciprocal deposits
|
|
|
23,401
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
56,741
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
210,920
|
|
7.7%
|
|
Brokered deposits
|
|
|
135,043
|
|
6.2%
|
|
|
|
144,977
|
|
7.1%
|
|
|
|
237,292
|
|
8.7%
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,174,605
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
2,034,328
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
2,727,169
|
|
100.0%
|
Certain statements in this news release are forward-looking statements,
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act”).
These statements are based on management’s current expectations or
predictions of future results or events. We make these forward-looking
statements in reliance on the safe harbor provisions provided under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in
this news release which relate to performance, development or activities
that we expect or anticipate will or may happen in the future, are
forward looking statements. The discussions regarding our growth
strategy, expansion of operations in our markets, acquisitions,
dispositions, competition, loan and deposit growth or decline, timing of
new branch openings, capital expectations, and response to consolidation
in the banking industry include forward-looking statements. Other
forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of
forward-looking words such as "believe,” "expect,” "may,” "might,”
"will,” "should,” "seek,” "could,” "approximately,” "intend,” "plan,”
"estimate,” or "anticipate” or the negative of those words or other
similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and
are based on numerous assumptions. They are not guarantees of future
performance. A number of important factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in the forward-looking statement. Some
factors include changes in interest rates, local business conditions,
government regulations, lack of available credit, lack of confidence in
the financial markets, loss of key personnel or inability to hire
suitable personnel, asset quality and loan loss trends, faster or slower
than anticipated growth, economic conditions, our competitors’ responses
to our marketing strategy or new competitive conditions, and competition
in the geographic and business areas in which we conduct our operations.
Forward-looking statements contained herein are made only as of the date
made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update them to reflect
events or circumstances after the date of this report to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, we
caution that there are important factors, in addition to those listed
above, that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
contained in the forward-looking statements. These factors are included
in our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
First State’s news releases and filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission are available through the Investor Relations section of First
State’s website at www.fcbnm.com.
