The U.S. Army’s conclusion that Oshkosh Corporation (NYSE: OSK) proposed
the lowest price and has the capability and experience to build the
Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) was unchallenged by the
Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) decision, released in redacted
form today. The decision significantly expands on the GAO’s press
release of December 14, 2009, regarding the protests against the U.S.
Army’s award decision by BAE Systems and Navistar Defense.
The decision by the GAO upheld only two narrowly-defined aspects of the
protests against the U.S. Army by the disappointed bidders, rejecting
all of the numerous other protest grounds raised during the three-month
protest process which covered virtually every aspect of the evaluation.
The GAO determined that the Army erred in evaluating one element of the
broader production capability subfactor. To address this, the GAO
recommended that the Army re-evaluate the offerors’ proposals as to this
element and also determine whether there was any possible impact on a
second element. These elements are just two of seven elements in the
production subfactor of the capability evaluation factor, all of which
receive less weight than price. The GAO provided no opinion as to
whether the re-evaluation of these two elements would in fact change the
award decision by the Army.
The Oshkosh proposed price is significantly lower than what the
Government is currently paying the incumbent FMTV contractor and was
revealed today to be nearly $440 million lower over the life of the
contract than that proposed by incumbent BAE. Widely publicized
protestor complaints relating to Oshkosh’s price, armored cab design,
financial stability and manufacturing prowess all were denied by the
GAO. The GAO stated in its decision, "With the exception of two areas,
we find that the [Army’s] evaluation was reasonable.” Oshkosh Defense
was awarded the contract on August 26, 2009.
"After a thorough acquisition process by the Army that began nearly
seven months ago, followed by formal protests that took three months to
resolve, we believe the Army will quickly and appropriately
address the GAO’s recommendations,” said Robert G. Bohn, Oshkosh
Corporation chairman and chief executive officer. "We believe that in
its review, the Army will find that Oshkosh Corporation was and
continues to be the correct choice for the FMTV contract, providing
proven capability and the best value to the Army and the taxpayer.”
As the GAO’s decision reaffirms, Oshkosh was awarded the contract
because the company bid the FMTV at a very competitive price while
receiving excellent evaluations for meeting vehicle production and
delivery requirements, including any possible production surges that
might be required by the Army.
The U.S. Army has 60 days from December 14, 2009 to act on the GAO’s
recommendations and report its findings.
"Oshkosh plans to build the FMTV and meet all of the Army’s objectives
while saving hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars that the Army can
use for other pressing requirements,” Bohn said. "And we will do this
without impacting our other existing or proposed military vehicle
contract programs.”
Bohn added, "It is important to realize the GAO’s decision did not
recommend that the proposals be recompeted or revised, nor did it
recommend termination of our contract. We believe that the redacted
decision issued today further supports our assessment that Oshkosh is in
a strong position to retain the contract when the two narrow issues on
which the protests were upheld are reconsidered.”
Oshkosh remains the only current manufacturer of both medium and heavy
tactical wheeled vehicles in the U.S. defense industry, having produced
more than 70,000 military-class vehicles in its manufacturing
facilities. Oshkosh Corporation’s proven production capabilities were
recently recognized by the National Center for Advanced Technologies
(NCAT), which awarded Oshkosh with a 2009 Defense Manufacturing
Excellence Award for its M-ATV launch team, which has exceeded delivery
requirements for every month since the contract award on June 30, 2009.
About Oshkosh Defense
Oshkosh Defense, a division of Oshkosh Corporation, is an
industry-leading global designer and manufacturer of tactical military
trucks and armored wheeled vehicles, delivering a full product line of
conventional and hybrid vehicles, advanced armor options, proprietary
suspensions and vehicles with payloads that can exceed 70 tons. Oshkosh
Defense provides a global service and supply network including full
life-cycle support and remanufacturing, and its vehicles are recognized
the world over for superior performance, reliability and protection. For
more information, visit www.oshkoshdefense.com.
About Oshkosh Corporation
Oshkosh Corporation is a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of
a broad range of specialty access equipment, commercial, fire &
emergency and military vehicles and vehicle bodies. Oshkosh Corp.
manufactures, distributes and services products under the brands of
Oshkosh®, JLG®, Pierce®, McNeilus®,
Medtec®, Jerr-Dan®, Oshkosh Specialty Vehicles,
Frontline™, SMIT™, CON-E-CO®, London® and IMT®.
Oshkosh products are valued worldwide in businesses where high quality,
superior performance, rugged reliability and long-term value are
paramount. For more information, log on to www.oshkoshcorporation.com.
®, ™ All brand names referred to in this news release are
trademarks of Oshkosh Corporation or its subsidiary companies.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains statements that the Company believes to be
"forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than
statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements
regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy,
targets, projected sales, costs, earnings, capital expenditures, debt
levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future
operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this press
release, words such as "may,” "will,” "expect,” "intend,” "estimate,”
"anticipate,” "believe,” "should,” "project” or "plan” or the negative
thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology are generally
intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to
risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are
beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. These factors include risks related to the required increase
in the rate of production for the M-ATV contract and the amount, if any,
of additional orders for M-ATVs that the Company may receive; the
cyclical nature of the Company’s access equipment, commercial and fire &
emergency markets, especially during a global recession and credit
crisis; the duration of the global recession, which could lead to
additional impairment charges related to many of the Company’s
intangible assets; the expected level and timing of U.S. Department of
Defense procurement of products and services and funding thereof,
including the outcome of the formal protests of the Family of Medium
Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) award to the Company; risks related to
reductions in government expenditures and the uncertainty of government
contracts; the consequences of financial leverage associated with the
JLG acquisition, which could limit the Company’s ability to pursue
various opportunities; risks related to the collectability of
receivables during a recession, particularly for those businesses with
exposure to construction markets; risks related to production delays as
a result of the economy’s impact on the Company’s suppliers; the
potential for commodity costs to rise sharply, including in a future
economic recovery; risks associated with international operations and
sales, including foreign currency fluctuations; and the potential for
increased costs relating to compliance with changes in laws and
regulations. Additional information concerning these and other factors
is contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of
this press release. The Company assumes no obligation, and disclaims any
obligation, to update information contained in this press release.