A recent survey of solar
cell/photovoltaic
device researchers and manufacturers working in government,
university-based, and corporate labs and manufacturing facilities
indicates distinct differences in testing methods and priorities among
respondents from Asia, North America, and Europe. Keithley
Instruments, Inc. (NYSE: KEI) conducted the study during Summer 2009
using a by-invitation-only online survey generating 564 responses. A
white paper summarizing the results is available for downloading at no
charge from Keithley's website at: http://www.keithley.com/data?asset=52794.
Across all geographies, the survey indicated the industry is focused on
improving device efficiencies as the dominant development priority.
"Reducing manufacturing cost” was the second most important among the
respondents, as might be expected, although substantially less
significant than the need to boost device and panel performance.
Clear Priority Emerges for Top Four Solar Cell Test Methods
For those engaged in solar cell research and development, a large
majority of respondents worldwide identified their "key parameters” for
measurement as short-circuit current (ISC), open-circuit
voltage (VOC), maximum output power (PMAX) and, to
a lesser extent, conversion efficiency. Respondents in North America and
Europe showed consistent agreement on what constitutes their most
important tests, with a well-defined gap between these top four and ten
other tests. Respondents from Asia, while agreeing with the same top
four tests, showed much less preference for them as other tests were
cited as key parameters nearly as often as the top four.
"The top three tests indicated by respondents are consistent with what
customers tell us are important methodologies for them in the research
phase,” noted Keithley Marketing Director Mark Cejer. "We were a bit
surprised not to see more priority given to shunt resistance and series
resistance tests, as we hear quite a bit about how important those
measurements are to characterizing device performance. Overall, other
than a clear preference for the top three tests, there remains a
significant amount of variation in the industry about what tests are
most meaningful. There may be several reasons for this variation. For
example, the tests used may vary depending on the cell technology or on
the market for which they are intended. Also, many of the solar cell
technologies are relatively new and therefore there are no
industry-standard testing methodologies.”
The priority of test parameters characterized as solar
cell/photovoltaics move into production remained much the same, but
there was far less agreement about the most important tests than was
found in the research lab. And, Asian respondents were far more
definitive about the most valuable solar cell tests for production than
for research applications.
Engineers in general seem to be relatively unfazed by the solar cell
industry’s rather complicated battery of tests. When asked which tests
presented technical challenges, none of the 15 tests appeared to pose a
problem for a large portion of the respondents, either in the research
or production test phase. This held true for even the most demanding
tests included on the list, such as quantum efficiency and conversion
efficiency. Maximum power output was identified as the most difficult
test to perform, with 28% noting it as the "most challenging,” perhaps
reflecting the difficulty of integrating 50W power supplies into a test
system for this type of research.
PV Device Technologies
Survey respondents report engagement in a broad range of solar cell/PV
device technologies, including established, relatively
well-characterized technologies for making PV devices out of
monocrystalline, multicrystalline, or amorphous silicon, as well as
newer thin-film technologies such as copper indium gallium selenide
(CIGS), cadmium telluride (CdTe), and gallium arsenide (GaAs). In
general, respondents seemed more active in thin-film materials than in
silicon, perhaps due to the improved response rates and capacitive
properties of thin-film materials.
Given the staggering array of device technologies now being explored or
developed, the industry seems poised to become larger and increasingly
competitive, with manufacturers making significant investments in
finding new ways to extract the maximum energy at the lowest possible
cost from every photon that reaches their products. Asian manufacturers
appear firmly committed to playing a major role in the worldwide solar
cell industry.
For More Information
To learn more about Keithley’s solar cell test solutions or to download
a free copy of the white paper outlining the results of the survey,
visit http://www.keithley.com/data?asset=52794
or contact the company at:
|
Telephone:
|
|
800-688-9951 440-248-0400
|
|
FAX:
|
|
440-248-6168
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
publisher@keithley.com
|
|
Internet:
|
|
www.keithley.com
|
|
Address:
|
|
Keithley Instruments, Inc.
|
|
|
|
28775 Aurora Road
|
|
|
|
Cleveland, OH 44139-1891
|
About Keithley Instruments, Inc. With more than 60 years of
measurement expertise, Keithley Instruments has become a world leader in
advanced electrical test instruments and systems. Our customers are
scientists and engineers in the worldwide electronics industry involved
with advanced materials research, semiconductor device development and
fabrication, and the production of end products such as portable
wireless devices. The value we provide them is a combination of products
for their critical measurement needs and a rich understanding of their
applications to improve the quality of their products and reduce their
cost of test.
Products and company names listed are trademarks or trade names of their
respective companies.