Post Properties, Inc. (NYSE: PPS) announced today net income available
to common shareholders of $2.4 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, for
the fourth quarter of 2010, compared to a net loss attributable to
common shareholders of $10.8 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, for
the fourth quarter of 2009.
The Company’s net loss attributable to common shareholders for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 included $4.4 million of severance
charges as well as a loss of $4.1 million associated with the early
extinguishment of indebtedness.
The Company also announced a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to a net loss of $10.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2009. On a diluted per share basis, the net loss attributable to common
shareholders was $0.30 for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to
a net loss of $0.24 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Company’s net loss attributable to common shareholders for the year
ended December 31, 2010 included non-cash impairment charges of
approximately $35.1 million primarily relating to the Company’s Austin
condominium project, offset by a net gain of $20.9 million related to
the acquisition of all remaining interests in its Atlanta condominium
project and adjacent land and infrastructure and the acquisition of the
related construction loans. The Company’s net loss attributable to
common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 included net
gains of $79.4 million on the sales of apartment communities and income
of $1.8 million relating to the mark-to-market of an interest rate swap
agreement and changes in previous hurricane loss estimates. These gains
were offset by non-cash impairment charges of $76.3 million relating to
the Company’s investment in the Atlanta condominium project and adjacent
land and infrastructure, severance charges of $4.8 million, an aggregate
loss of approximately $3.3 million related to the early extinguishment
of indebtedness and other charges totaling $0.5 million.
Funds From Operations
The Company uses the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts ("NAREIT”) definition of Funds from Operations ("FFO”) as an
operating measure of the Company’s financial performance. A
reconciliation of FFO to GAAP net income is included in the financial
data (Table 1) accompanying this press release.
FFO for the fourth quarter of 2010 was $21.1 million, or $0.43 per
diluted share, compared to $8.2 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, for
the fourth quarter of 2009.
The Company’s reported FFO for the fourth quarter of 2009 included the
severance charges and debt extinguishment loss discussed above totaling
$8.5 million, or $0.17 per diluted share.
FFO for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $59.3 million, or $1.21 per
diluted share, compared to a deficit of $20.0 million, or $0.44 per
diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Company’s reported FFO for the year ended December 31, 2010 included
the non-cash impairment charges discussed above totaling $35.1 million,
offset by the net gain discussed above totaling $20.9 million, resulting
in total net charges included in FFO of $14.2 million, or $0.29 per
diluted share. The Company’s reported FFO for the year ended December
31, 2009 included the non-cash impairment charges, severance charges,
debt extinguishment loss and other charges discussed above totaling
approximately $84.9 million, offset by the income items discussed above
totaling approximately $1.8 million, resulting in total net charges of
approximately $83.1 million, or $1.82 per diluted share.
Said Dave Stockert, CEO and President of Post, "The Company finished the
year well, with property revenues in the fourth quarter turning solidly
positive, on a year-over-year basis, on increasing rents and higher
occupancy. Our outlook for 2011 reflects our expectations of the
continued improvement and growing profitability of our business.”
Mature (Same Store) Community Data
Average economic occupancy at the Company’s 43 mature (same store)
communities, containing 15,713 apartment units, was 95.2% and 94.4% for
the fourth quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Total revenues for the mature communities increased 1.7% and total
operating expenses decreased 5.5% during the fourth quarter of 2010,
compared to the fourth quarter of 2009, resulting in a 6.9% increase in
same store net operating income ("NOI”). The average monthly rental rate
per unit increased 0.7% during the fourth quarter of 2010, compared to
the fourth quarter of 2009.
On a sequential basis, total revenues for the mature communities
decreased 0.7% and total operating expenses decreased 10.5%, producing a
6.6% increase in same store NOI for the fourth quarter of 2010, compared
to the third quarter of 2010. On a sequential basis, the average monthly
rental rate per unit increased 0.6%. For the fourth quarter of 2010,
average economic occupancy at the mature communities was 95.2%, compared
to 95.8% for the third quarter of 2010.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, average economic occupancy at the
Company’s mature communities was 95.3%, compared to 94.0% for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
Total revenues for the mature communities decreased 1.5% and total
operating expenses decreased 1.2% for the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2009, resulting in a 1.7%
decrease in same store NOI. The average monthly rental rate per unit
decreased 3.4% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to the
year ended December 31, 2009.
Same store NOI is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. A
reconciliation of same store NOI to the comparable GAAP financial
measure is included in the financial data (Table 2) accompanying this
press release. Information on same store NOI and average rental rate per
unit by geographic market is also included in the financial data (Table
3) accompanying this press release.
Development Activity
The Company today announced the planned development of its Post South
Lamar™ apartment community in Austin, TX. Post South Lamar™ is planned
to consist of 298 apartment units with an average unit size of
approximately 852 square feet and approximately 8,555 square feet of
street-level retail space, and is expected to have a total estimated
development cost of approximately $41.7 million. The Company currently
expects the stabilized yield on the project will be approximately 7.0%,
after a 3% management fee and $300 per unit reserve, and based on
current market rents, without trending. The Company anticipates that
first apartment unit deliveries will occur in the third quarter of 2012.
The Company currently expects to fund future estimated construction
expenditures primarily by utilizing available borrowings under its
unsecured revolving lines of credit and proceeds under its at-the-market
common equity sales program.
The Company today also announced that its Post Park® apartment community
in Hyattsville, MD, consisting of 396 apartment units, had achieved
stabilized occupancy as of the end of 2010.
Financing Activity
Debt Financing, Leverage and Line Capacity
In December 2010, the Company repaid its $100.5 million of outstanding
7.7% senior unsecured notes upon their maturity. These notes were repaid
using the proceeds from the Company’s $150.0 million, 4.75% senior
unsecured notes offering completed in October 2010.
In January 2011, the Company entered into a new unsecured revolving line
of credit facility. The credit facility was provided by a syndicate of
eight financial institutions arranged by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The credit facility provides for a $300
million unsecured revolving line of credit which has a three-year term
with a one-year extension option, and which matures in January 2014. The
new credit facility amends and restates the Company’s existing $400
million unsecured revolving credit facility. The credit facility has a
current stated interest rate of the London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus 2.30% and requires the payment of annual facility fees
currently equal to 0.45% of the aggregate loan commitments. The credit
facility provides for the interest rate and facility fee rate to be
adjusted up or down based on changes in the credit ratings of the
Company’s senior unsecured debt. The credit facility also includes an
uncommitted competitive bid option for up to half of the total available
borrowing facility, as long as the Company maintains its investment
grade credit rating. This option allows participating banks to bid to
provide the Company loans at a rate that is lower than the stated rate
for syndicated borrowings. The credit facility contains representations,
financial and other affirmative and negative covenants, events of
defaults and remedies typical for this type of facility.
In January 2011, the Company also entered into a new unsecured revolving
line of credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., providing for a
$30 million unsecured cash management line of credit which has a
three-year term with a one-year extension option, and which matures in
January 2014. The cash management line carries pricing and terms,
including debt covenants, substantially consistent with those of the
syndicated credit facility described above. The new credit agreement
amends and restates the Company’s existing $30 million unsecured
revolving cash management line.
Total debt and preferred equity as a percentage of undepreciated real
estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) was
42.1% at December 31, 2010, and variable rate debt as a percentage of
total debt was 0.0% as of that same date.
As of February 7, 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$14.2 million. The Company had no outstanding borrowings and letters of
credit totaling $0.7 million under its combined $330 million unsecured
lines of credit.
Computations of debt ratios and reconciliations of the ratios to the
appropriate GAAP measures in the Company’s financial statements are
included in the financial data (Table 4) accompanying this press release.
Other Capital Markets Activity
The Company today announced its intention to redeem all outstanding
shares of its 7-5/8% Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock in
March 2011 for its redemption value of approximately $49.6 million, plus
accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date. The Company
expects to record a charge of approximately $1.8 million, or $0.04 per
diluted share, in the first quarter of 2011 relating to the write off of
original issuance costs and expenses in connection with the redemption.
The Company has an at-the-market common equity program for the sale of
up to four million shares of common stock. The Company expects to use
this program in 2011 as an additional source of capital and liquidity,
to maintain the strength of its balance sheet and to fund its planned
investment activities. Sales under this program will be dependent upon a
variety of factors, including, among others, market conditions, the
trading price of the Company’s common stock and potential use of
proceeds. No shares were issued under this program in the fourth
quarter. For the year ended December 31, 2010, and through the date of
this press release, the Company sold 41,313 shares, at an average price
per share of $27.70, producing net proceeds of $1.1 million under this
program.
Other Investment Activity
Condominium Activity
During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company closed 17 condominium
units at its Austin Condominium Project for aggregate gross revenue of
$18.8 million. During the quarter, the Company also sold 4 condominium
units at its Atlanta Condominium Project for aggregate gross revenue of
$3.5 million. As of February 7, 2011, the Company has, in the aggregate,
closed 55 units at the Austin Condominium Project and had 14 units under
contract. As of that same date, the Company has, in the aggregate,
closed 4 units at the Atlanta Condominium Project and had 6 units under
contract. There can be no assurance that condominium units under
contract will close.
The Company recognized incremental net gains in FFO of $3.8 million from
condominium sales activities during the fourth quarter of 2010, compared
to $1.5 million during the fourth quarter of 2009. For the year ended
December 31, 2010, the Company recognized incremental net gains in FFO
of $5.9 million from condominium sales activities, compared to
incremental losses of $0.1 million during the same period in 2009.
Land Activity
Sales
During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company sold a land parcel
located in Raleigh, North Carolina for gross proceeds of $5.3 million.
No gain or loss was recognized, as the land was previously recorded as
held for sale at fair value.
Purchases
In November 2010, pursuant to the terms of the final trial court order
in connection with a previously disclosed lawsuit involving the
Company’s Post Pentagon Row™ apartment community in Arlington Co., VA,
the land under Pentagon Row was transferred to the Company and Federal
Realty Investment Trust, collectively. The Company paid $8.8 million for
its interest in the property. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010, the Company recorded $1.1 million of ground rent expense
(including a straight-line rent adjustment of $0.4 million) at Post
Pentagon Row™ that will not recur in future periods as a result of the
Company’s acquisition of the land underlying the ground lease. Post
Pentagon Row™ is included in the Company’s "same store” communities. The
Company also recorded income of $0.5 million in other income in
connection with the reimbursement of a portion of the ground lease
payments it incurred from the date of the trial court decision to the
date of closing.
2011 Outlook
The estimates and assumptions presented below are forward looking and
are based on the Company’s future view of the apartment and condominium
markets and of general economic conditions, as well as other risks
outlined below under the caption "Forward Looking Statements.” There can
be no assurance that the Company’s actual results will not differ
materially from the estimates set forth below. The Company assumes no
obligation to update this guidance in the future.
Based on its current outlook, the Company anticipates that FFO for the
full year 2011 will be in the range of $1.49 to $1.67 per diluted share.
This outlook assumes that net gains from condominium sales will be in
the range of $0.00 to $0.08 per diluted share (for purposes of this
discussion, "Condo FFO”). Excluding Condo FFO, the Company anticipates
that FFO for the full year 2011 will be in the range of $1.49 to $1.59
per diluted share (for purposes of this discussion, "Core FFO”).
As discussed below, the Company expects to record a charge of
approximately $0.04 per diluted share in connection with the redemption
of preferred stock in the first quarter of 2011. Excluding the impact of
this charge, the Company anticipates that FFO for the full year 2011
will be in the range of $1.53 to $1.71 per diluted share and Core FFO
will be in the range of $1.53 to $1.63 per diluted share.
The above estimates of Core FFO are based on the following expected
changes in same store NOI in 2011, compared to 2010 (see Table 4 in the
Fourth Quarter 2010 Supplemental Financial Data for 2010 net operating
income that will make up the 2011 same store pool):
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
3.7% to 4.3%
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
1.5% to 2.1% (1)
|
|
Net operating income (NOI)
|
|
|
|
4.8% to 6.2% (1)
|
(1) Excluding the impact of the elimination of the ground lease expense
associated with the acquisition of the land underlying Post Pentagon
Row™, as discussed above, the range of operating expense growth would be
2.6% to 3.2%, and the range of NOI growth would be 4.0% to 5.4%.
The above estimates of Core FFO are also based on the following
assumptions:
-
Newly stabilized property NOI is expected to increase just under 50%
at the mid-point of the projected range of Core FFO in 2011, compared
to 2010 (see Table 4 in the Fourth Quarter 2010 Supplemental Financial
Data for 2010 net operating income that will make up the 2011 newly
stabilized property pool);
-
Interest capitalized to development projects is expected to decrease
just over 50% in 2011, compared to 2010, based on projected
construction expenditures of approximately $80 million in 2011,
relating to previously announced construction starts (the second phase
of Post Carlyle™ in Alexandria, VA and Post South Lamar™ in Austin,
TX) and, to a lesser extent, assumed additional development starts
later in 2011; the Company currently expects that development starts
(including Post South Lamar™) will be at least $100 million in 2011;
-
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized) is expected to increase
by approximately 5% at the mid-point of the projected range of Core
FFO in 2011, compared to 2010, as a result of an expected decrease in
interest capitalized as discussed above, offset by an expected
decrease in interest incurred;
-
Preferred dividends are expected to decrease in 2011, compared to
2010, as a result of the announced redemption of the Company’s 7-5/8 %
Series B preferred shares in March 2011; the Company expects to record
a charge of approximately $1.8 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, in
the first quarter of 2011 in connection with the redemption;
-
Diluted shares are expected to increase in 2011, compared to 2010,
based in part on the assumption that a portion of the projected
construction expenditures and the preferred stock redemption will be
funded through the issuance, over the course of 2011, of approximately
one-half of the approximately 4 million common shares available for
issuance under the Company’s at-the-market common equity sales program;
-
No acquisitions or dispositions of operating real estate assets are
currently assumed in 2011; and
-
In the aggregate, general and administrative expenses, corporate
property management expenses and investment and development expenses
(net of amounts capitalized to development projects) are expected to
be flat to down modestly in 2011, compared to 2010.
The Company does not expect to further engage in the for-sale
condominium business in future periods, other than completing the
sell-out of units at its two remaining condominium projects. Although
the Company includes condominium profits in its reported FFO, the
Company’s intention over time is to liquidate its investment in its two
remaining condominium projects and to redeploy the invested capital back
into its core apartment business. The above estimates of Condo FFO are
based on the following assumptions:
-
An assumed quarterly run-rate of condominium holding expenses
(including homeowners’ association dues, real estate taxes, utilities
and administrative and marketing costs) of up to approximately $0.05
per diluted share per quarter; if condominium profits are not
sufficient to fully cover condominium holding expenses, it would cause
the Company to record a loss during such period;
-
An assumed monthly run-rate of condominium unit sales averaging
approximately 1.5 to 2 units per month at each of the Company’s
condominium projects (see Summary of Condominium Projects in the
Fourth Quarter 2010 Supplemental Financial Data for additional
information); and
-
Sales mix, sales velocity and unit pricing that are relatively
consistent with the valuation models for each of the condominium
projects; actual sales mix, sales velocity and unit pricing can vary
significantly from the valuation models and, as a result, could cause
actual condominium profits to differ materially from the Company’s
estimates and, further, could cause the Company to re-evaluate its
valuation models and assumptions which could result in impairment
losses in future periods.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The Company today announced that its Annual Meeting of Shareholders will
be held on May 25, 2011.
Supplemental Financial Data
The Company also produces Supplemental Financial Data that includes
detailed information regarding the Company’s operating results,
investment activity, financing activity, balance sheet and properties.
This Supplemental Financial Data is considered an integral part of this
earnings release and is available on the Company’s website. The
Company’s Earnings Release and the Supplemental Financial Data are
available through the For Investors/Financial Reports/Quarterly and
Other Reports section of the Company’s website at www.postproperties.com.
The ability to access the attachments on the Company’s website requires
the Adobe Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded at http://get.adobe.com/reader/.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Defined Terms
The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures and other defined
terms in this press release and in its Supplemental Financial Data
available on the Company’s website. The non-GAAP financial measures
include FFO, Adjusted Funds from Operations ("AFFO”), net operating
income, same store capital expenditures, and certain debt statistics and
ratios. The definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures are
summarized below and on page 21 of the Supplemental Financial Data. The
Company believes that these measures are helpful to investors in
measuring financial performance and/or liquidity and comparing such
performance and/or liquidity to other REITs.
Funds from Operations – The Company uses FFO as an operating
measure. The Company uses the NAREIT definition of FFO. FFO is defined
by NAREIT to mean net income (loss) available to common shareholders
determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from
extraordinary items and sales of depreciable operating property, plus
depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after
adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures all
determined on a consistent basis in accordance with GAAP. FFO presented
in the Company’s press release and Supplemental Financial Data is not
necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies
because not all real estate companies use the same definition. The
Company’s FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use
the current NAREIT definition.
Accounting for real estate assets using historical cost accounting under
GAAP assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably
over time. NAREIT stated in its April 2002 White Paper on Funds from
Operations that "since real estate asset values have historically risen
or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have
considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies
that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.”
As a result, the concept of FFO was created by NAREIT for the REIT
industry to provide an alternate measure. Since the Company agrees with
the concept of FFO and appreciates the reasons surrounding its creation,
the Company believes that FFO is an important supplemental measure of
operating performance. In addition, since most equity REITs provide FFO
information to the investment community, the Company believes that FFO
is a useful supplemental measure for comparing the Company’s results to
those of other equity REITs. The Company believes that the line on its
consolidated statement of operations entitled "net income available to
common shareholders” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO.
Adjusted Funds From Operations – The Company also uses adjusted funds
from operations ("AFFO”) as an operating measure. AFFO is defined as FFO
less operating capital expenditures and after adjusting for the impact
of non-cash straight-line, long-term ground lease expense, non-cash
impairment charges, non-cash income (loss) related to mark-to-market of
interest rate swap agreements, non-cash debt extinguishment costs and
preferred stock redemption costs. The Company believes that AFFO is an
important supplemental measure of operating performance for an equity
REIT because it provides investors with an indication of the REIT’s
ability to fund its operating capital expenditures through earnings. In
addition, since most equity REITs provide AFFO information to the
investment community, the Company believes that AFFO is a useful
supplemental measure for comparing the Company to other equity REITs.
The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of
operations entitled "net income available to common shareholders” is the
most directly comparable GAAP measure to AFFO.
Property Net Operating Income ("NOI”) – The Company uses property
NOI, including same store NOI and same store NOI by market, as an
operating measure. NOI is defined as rental and other revenues from real
estate operations less total property and maintenance expenses from real
estate operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). The
Company believes that NOI is an important supplemental measure of
operating performance for a REIT’s operating real estate because it
provides a measure of the core operations, rather than factoring in
depreciation and amortization, financing costs and general and
administrative expenses generally incurred at the corporate level. This
measure is particularly useful, in the opinion of the Company, in
evaluating the performance of geographic operations, same store
groupings and individual properties. Additionally, the Company believes
that NOI, as defined, is a widely accepted measure of comparative
operating performance in the real estate investment community. The
Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of
operations entitled "net income” is the most directly comparable GAAP
measure to NOI.
Same Store Capital Expenditures – The Company uses same store
annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures as
cash flow measures. Same store annually recurring and periodically
recurring capital expenditures are supplemental non-GAAP financial
measures. The Company believes that same store annually recurring and
periodically recurring capital expenditures are important indicators of
the costs incurred by the Company in maintaining its same store
communities on an ongoing basis. The corresponding GAAP measures include
information with respect to the Company’s other operating segments
consisting of communities stabilized in the prior year, lease-up
communities, rehabilitation properties, sold properties and commercial
properties in addition to same store information. Therefore, the Company
believes that the Company’s presentation of same store annually
recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is necessary
to demonstrate same store replacement costs over time. The Company
believes that the most directly comparable GAAP measure to same store
annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is
the line on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows entitled
"property capital expenditures,” which also includes revenue generating
capital expenditures.
Debt Statistics and Debt Ratios – The Company uses a number of
debt statistics and ratios as supplemental measures of liquidity. The
numerator and/or the denominator of certain of these statistics and/or
ratios include non-GAAP financial measures that have been reconciled to
the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. These debt
statistics and ratios include: (1) an interest coverage ratio; (2) a
fixed charge coverage ratio; (3) total debt as a percentage of
undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s
share of debt); (4) total debt plus preferred equity as a percentage of
undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s
share of debt); (5) a ratio of consolidated debt to total assets; (6) a
ratio of secured debt to total assets; (7) a ratio of total unencumbered
assets to unsecured debt; and (8) a ratio of consolidated income
available to debt service to annual debt service charge. A number of
these debt statistics and ratios are derived from covenants found in the
Company’s debt agreements, including, among others, the Company’s senior
unsecured notes. In addition, the Company presents these measures
because the degree of leverage could affect the Company’s ability to
obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes. The
Company uses these measures internally as an indicator of liquidity and
the Company believes that these measures are also utilized by the
investment and analyst communities to better understand the Company’s
liquidity.
Average Economic Occupancy – The Company uses average economic
occupancy as a statistical measure of operating performance. The Company
defines average economic occupancy as gross potential rent less vacancy
losses, model expenses and bad debt expenses divided by gross potential
rent for the period, expressed as a percentage.
Conference Call Information
The Company will hold its quarterly conference call on Wednesday,
February 9, at 10:00 a.m. ET. The telephone numbers are 888-299-7230 for
US and Canada callers and 719-325-2498 for international callers. The
access code is 8409814. The conference call will be open to the public
and can be listened to live on Post’s website at www.postproperties.com
under For Investors/Event Calendar. The replay will begin at 1:00 p.m.
ET on Wednesday, February 9, and will be available until Tuesday,
February, 15, at 11:59 p.m. ET. The telephone numbers for the replay are
888-203-1112 for US and Canada callers and 719-457-0820 for
international callers. The access code for the replay is 8409814. A
replay of the call also will be archived on Post’s website under For
Investors/Audio Archive. The financial and statistical information that
will be discussed on the call is contained in this press release and the
Supplemental Financial Data. Both documents will be available through
the For Investors/Financial Reports/Quarterly & Other Reports section of
the Company’s website at www.postproperties.com.
About Post
Post Properties, founded 40 years ago, is a leading developer and
operator of upscale multifamily communities. The Company’s mission is
delivering superior satisfaction and value to its residents, associates,
and investors, with a vision of being the first choice in quality
multifamily living. Operating as a real estate investment trust
("REIT”), the Company focuses on developing and managing Post® branded
resort-style garden and high density urban apartments. Post Properties
is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, and has operations in nine markets
across the country.
Post Properties has interests in 20,505 apartment units in 56
communities, including 1,747 apartment units in five communities held in
unconsolidated entities and 642 apartment units at two communities
currently under construction. The Company is also selling luxury
for-sale condominium homes in two communities through a taxable REIT
subsidiary.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this press release and other written or oral
statements made by or on behalf of the Company, may constitute
"forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal
securities laws. Statements regarding future events and developments and
the Company’s future performance, as well as management’s expectations,
beliefs, plans, estimates or projections relating to the future, are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. Examples of
such statements in this press release include, expectations regarding
future operating conditions, including the Company’s current outlook as
to expected funds from operations, revenue, operating expenses, net
operating income, newly stabilized property net operating income,
interest capitalized to development projects, interest expense,
preferred dividends, number of diluted shares, condominium profits and
underlying assumptions, charges and overhead expenses for the first
quarter and full year 2011, anticipated development activities
(including the projected costs, projected construction expenditures,
projected yield, timing and anticipated potential sources of financing
of projected future development activities), expectations regarding the
for-sale condominium business and the timing, sales pace and closing
volumes of condominium homes, expectations regarding the redemption of
the Company’s 7-5/8% series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock and
expectations regarding offerings of the Company’s common stock and the
use of proceeds thereof. All forward-looking statements are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events to differ
materially from those projected. Management believes that these
forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, you should not place
undue reliance on such statements. These statements are based on current
expectations and speak only as of the date of such statements. The
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of future events, new
information or otherwise.
The following are some of the factors that could cause the Company’s
actual results and its expectations to differ materially from those
described in the Company’s forward-looking statements: the success of
the Company’s business strategies discussed in its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in subsequent filings with
the SEC; future local and national economic conditions, including
changes in job growth, interest rates, the availability of mortgage and
other financing and related factors; uncertainties associated with the
global capital markets, including the continued availability of
traditional sources of capital and liquidity and related factors;
conditions affecting ownership of residential real estate and general
conditions in the multi-family residential real estate market; the
effects on the financial markets of the economic stabilization actions
of the U.S. government, U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve and other
governmental and regulatory bodies; uncertainties associated with the
Company’s real estate development and construction; uncertainties
associated with the timing and amount of apartment community sales; the
Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to make required
payments associated with its debt financing; the effects of the
Company’s leverage on its risk of default and debt service requirements;
the impact of a downgrade in the credit rating of the Company’s
securities; the effects of a default by the Company or its subsidiaries
on an obligation to repay outstanding indebtedness, including
cross-defaults and cross-acceleration under other indebtedness or the
responsibility for limited recourse guarantees; the effects of covenants
of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ mortgage indebtedness on
operational flexibility and default risks; the Company’s ability to
maintain its current dividend level; uncertainties associated with the
Company’s condominium for-sale housing business, including the timing
and volume of condominium sales; the impact of any additional charges
the Company may be required to record in the future related to any
impairment in the carrying value of its assets; the impact of
competition on the Company’s business, including competition for
residents in the Company’s apartment communities and buyers of the
Company’s for-sale condominium homes and development locations; the
Company’s ability to renew leases or relet units as leases expire; the
effectiveness of interest rate hedging contracts; the Company’s ability
to succeed in new markets; the costs associated with compliance with
laws requiring access to the Company’s properties by persons with
disabilities; the impact of the Company’s ongoing litigation with the
Equal Rights Center and the U.S. Department of Justice regarding the
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act as well as the
impact of other litigation; the effects of losses from natural
catastrophes in excess of insurance coverage; uncertainties associated
with environmental and other regulatory matters; the costs associated
with moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation; the Company’s
ability to control joint ventures, properties in which it has joint
ownership and corporations and limited partnership in which it has
partial interests; the Company’s ability to continue to qualify as a
REIT under the Internal Revenue Code; and the effects of changes in
accounting policies and other regulatory matters detailed in the
Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Other
important risk factors regarding the Company are included under the
caption "Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and may be discussed in subsequent
filings with the SEC. The risk factors discussed in Form 10-K under the
caption "Risk Factors” are specifically incorporated by reference into
this press release.
|
Financial Highlights
(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share and unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
72,269
|
|
$
|
68,640
|
|
|
$
|
285,138
|
|
|
$
|
276,323
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
2,441
|
|
$
|
(10,790
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,507
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,860
|
)
|
|
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders and unitholders (Table 1)
|
|
$
|
21,120
|
|
$
|
8,162
|
|
|
$
|
59,264
|
|
|
$
|
(20,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
48,907
|
|
|
48,230
|
|
|
|
48,483
|
|
|
|
45,179
|
|
|
Weighted average shares and units outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
49,077
|
|
|
48,406
|
|
|
|
48,655
|
|
|
|
45,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER COMMON SHARE DATA - DILUTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders and unitholders (Table 1) (1)
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Funds (deficit) from operations per share was computed using
weighted average shares and units outstanding, including the
impact of dilutive securities totaling 83 for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 and 149 and 0 for the years ended December
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These dilutive securities were
antidilutive to the computation of income (loss) per share, as the
Company reported a loss from continuing operations for these
periods under generally accepted accounting principles.
Additionally, basic and diluted weighted average shares and units
included the impact of non-vested shares and units totaling 211
and 221 for the three months ended and 206 and 217 for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for the
computation of funds from operations per share. Such non-vested
shares and units are considered in the income (loss) per share
computations under generally accepted accounting principles using
the "two-class method.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income Available to Common Shareholders to
|
|
Funds From Operations Available to Common Shareholders and
Unitholders
|
|
(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
2,441
|
|
|
$
|
(10,790
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,507
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,860
|
)
|
|
Noncontrolling interests - Operating Partnership
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
Depreciation on consolidated real estate assets, net
|
|
|
18,313
|
|
|
|
19,554
|
|
|
|
72,663
|
|
|
|
72,420
|
|
|
Depreciation on real estate assets held in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
Gains on sales of apartment communities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(79,366
|
)
|
|
Gains on sales of condominiums
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
|
(6,161
|
)
|
|
|
(3,481
|
)
|
|
Incremental gains (losses) on condominium sales (1)
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
5,898
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders and unitholders
|
|
$
|
21,120
|
|
|
$
|
8,162
|
|
|
$
|
59,264
|
|
|
$
|
(20,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds (deficit) from operations - per share and unit - diluted (2)
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
Weighted average shares and units outstanding - diluted (2)
|
|
|
49,288
|
|
|
|
48,710
|
|
|
|
49,010
|
|
|
|
45,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) For condominium conversion projects, the Company recognizes
incremental gains on condominium sales in FFO, net of provision for
income taxes, to the extent that net sales proceeds, less costs of
sales and expenses, from the sale of condominium units exceeds the
greater of their fair value or net book value as of the date the
property is acquired by the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary. For
condominium development projects, gains on condominium sales in FFO
are equivalent to gains reported under GAAP.
|
|
|
|
(2) Diluted weighted average shares and units include the impact of
dilutive securities totaling 83 for the three months ended December
31, 2009 and 149 and 0 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. These dilutive securities were antidilutive to
the computation of income (loss) per share, as the Company reported
a loss from continuing operations for these periods under generally
accepted accounting principles. Additionally, basic and diluted
weighted average shares and units included the impact of non-vested
shares and units totaling 211 and 221 for the three months and 206
and 217 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, for the computation of funds (deficit) from operations
per share. Such non- vested shares and units are considered in the
income (loss) per share computations under generally accepted
accounting principles using the "two-class method.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2
Reconciliation of Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) to GAAP
Net Income
(Unaudited; In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total same store NOI
|
|
$
|
36,135
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,813
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,903
|
|
|
|
$
|
137,429
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,753
|
|
|
Property NOI from other operating segments
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
|
|
|
4,811
|
|
|
|
|
15,336
|
|
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
|
Consolidated property NOI
|
|
|
41,037
|
|
|
|
|
35,975
|
|
|
|
|
38,714
|
|
|
|
|
152,765
|
|
|
|
|
143,593
|
|
|
Add (subtract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(18,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
(74,497
|
)
|
|
|
|
(74,442
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
(54,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
(52,377
|
)
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,079
|
)
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(3,873
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16,296
|
)
|
|
Investment and development
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,415
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,114
|
)
|
|
Other investment costs
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
(669
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,107
|
)
|
|
Impairment, severance and other charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(35,091
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13,507
|
)
|
|
Gains on condominium sales activities, net
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
6,161
|
|
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
real estate entities, net
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
18,258
|
|
|
|
|
18,739
|
|
|
|
|
(74,447
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
Net gain (loss) on early extinguishment of indebtedness
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(4,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
2,845
|
|
|
|
|
2,845
|
|
|
|
|
(3,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
4,294
|
|
|
|
|
(8,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
23,595
|
|
|
|
|
(6,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
(95,727
|
)
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
84,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,294
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,927
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
23,595
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,991
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11,489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3
|
|
Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) and Average Rental Rate per
Unit by Market
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Q4 '10
|
|
|
Q4 '10
|
|
|
Q4 '10
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
vs. Q4 '09
|
|
|
vs. Q3 '10
|
|
|
% Same
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
Store NOI
|
|
Rental and other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
$
|
15,840
|
|
|
$
|
15,653
|
|
|
$
|
15,961
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
10,408
|
|
|
|
10,070
|
|
|
|
10,560
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
10,495
|
|
|
|
10,385
|
|
|
|
10,634
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
7,768
|
|
|
|
7,651
|
|
|
|
7,762
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
4,211
|
|
|
|
4,180
|
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
3,453
|
|
|
|
3,337
|
|
|
|
3,396
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
2,433
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Total rental and other revenues
|
|
|
58,695
|
|
|
|
57,697
|
|
|
|
59,115
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses (exclusive of depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and amortization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
6,478
|
|
|
|
6,986
|
|
|
|
7,049
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
3,383
|
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
4,720
|
|
|
|
5,161
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
|
2,904
|
|
|
|
2,977
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22,560
|
|
|
|
23,884
|
|
|
|
25,212
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
9,362
|
|
|
|
8,667
|
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
7,025
|
|
|
|
6,441
|
|
|
|
6,672
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
6,139
|
|
|
|
5,665
|
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
2,420
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
Total same store NOI
|
|
$
|
36,135
|
|
|
$
|
33,813
|
|
|
$
|
33,903
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average rental rate per unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
$
|
1,056
|
|
|
$
|
1,046
|
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
1,813
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
3,641
|
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total average rental rate per unit
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3 (con’t)
|
|
Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) and Average Rental Rate per
Unit by Market
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Rental and other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
$
|
63,050
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,948
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
41,405
|
|
|
|
|
40,599
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
41,906
|
|
|
|
|
43,321
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
30,966
|
|
|
|
|
31,303
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
16,816
|
|
|
|
|
17,571
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
13,525
|
|
|
|
|
14,112
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
11,546
|
|
|
|
|
12,149
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
9,565
|
|
|
|
|
9,323
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
4,789
|
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Total rental and other revenues
|
|
|
233,568
|
|
|
|
|
237,105
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses (exclusive of depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and amortization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
27,447
|
|
|
|
|
28,262
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
14,566
|
|
|
|
|
14,385
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
18,886
|
|
|
|
|
19,071
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
11,701
|
|
|
|
|
12,295
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
6,741
|
|
|
|
|
6,501
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
|
|
|
5,548
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
4,996
|
|
|
|
|
5,160
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
96,139
|
|
|
|
|
97,352
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
35,603
|
|
|
|
|
35,686
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
26,839
|
|
|
|
|
26,214
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
23,020
|
|
|
|
|
24,250
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
19,265
|
|
|
|
|
19,008
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
7,664
|
|
|
|
|
8,564
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
|
6,989
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
5,721
|
|
|
|
|
5,364
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
2,692
|
|
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
Total same store NOI
|
|
$
|
137,429
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,753
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average rental rate per unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
$
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,090
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
|
3,788
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
|
1,328
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
Total average rental rate per unit
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4
|
|
Computation of Debt Ratios
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total real estate assets per balance sheet
|
|
$
|
2,042,375
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,106,520
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company share of real estate assets held in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
71,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,570
|
|
|
Company share of accumulated depreciation - assets held in
unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
10,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation per balance sheet
|
|
|
692,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
625,391
|
|
|
Total undepreciated real estate assets (A)
|
|
$
|
2,817,103
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,838,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt per balance sheet
|
|
$
|
1,033,249
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
992,760
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
59,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,576
|
|
|
Total debt (adjusted for joint venture partners' share of debt) (B)
|
|
$
|
1,092,850
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,109,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for
joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
partners' share of debt) (B÷A)
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt per balance sheet
|
|
$
|
1,033,249
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
992,760
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
59,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,576
|
|
|
Preferred shares at liquidation value
|
|
|
92,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
Total debt and preferred equity (adjusted for joint venture partners'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share of debt) (C)
|
|
$
|
1,185,813
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,204,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and preferred equity as a % of undepreciated real estate
assets (adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for joint venture partners' share of debt) (C÷A)
|
|
|
42.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
%
|
