Post Properties, Inc. (NYSE: PPS) announced today net income available
to common shareholders of $21.7 million, or $0.44 per diluted share, for
the third quarter of 2010, compared to $50.2 million, or $1.13 per
diluted share, for the third quarter of 2009.
The Company also announced a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $16.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, compared to a net loss of $0.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. On a diluted per share basis, the net loss
attributable to common shareholders was $0.35 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, compared to a net loss of less than $0.01 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The Company’s net income (loss) available to common shareholders for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 included a net gain of
$20.9 million related to the acquisition of all remaining interests in
its Atlanta condominium project and adjacent land and infrastructure and
the acquisition of the related construction loans. The Company’s net
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 also included
non-cash impairment charges of approximately $35.1 million primarily
relating to the Company’s Austin condominium project.
The Company’s net income available to common shareholders for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 included net gains of $54.6
million and $79.4 million, respectively, on the sales of apartment
communities, offset by severance charges of $0.4 million in the third
quarter of 2009. The Company’s net income available to common
shareholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 also included
non-cash impairment charges of $76.3 million relating to the Company’s
investment in the Atlanta condominium project and adjacent land and
infrastructure, partially offset by gains of $2.3 million relating to
the early extinguishment of indebtedness, the mark-to-market of an
interest rate swap, and changes in previous hurricane loss estimates.
Said David Stockert, CEO and President of Post, "We are pleased with the
Company’s results this quarter, which exceeded our expectations.
Apartment market conditions continued to improve and we were able to
grow revenues on a sequential basis in every one of our markets. As a
result, we again increased our guidance for funds from operations for
the full year 2010. We took advantage of the favorable interest
environment to refinance debt maturing in the near term and to preserve
the Company's substantial liquidity, and completed a series of
transactions that allow us to open our Atlanta condominium project and
begin closing units.”
The Company uses the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts ("NAREIT”) definition of Funds from Operations ("FFO”) as an
operating measure of the Company’s financial performance. A
reconciliation of FFO to GAAP net income is included in the financial
data (Table 1) accompanying this press release.
FFO for the third quarter of 2010 was $40.3 million, or $0.82 per
diluted share, compared to $13.9 million, or $0.31 per diluted share,
for the third quarter of 2009. The Company’s reported FFO for the third
quarter of 2010 included the net gain discussed above totaling $20.9
million, or $0.43 per diluted share. The Company’s reported FFO for the
third quarter of 2009 included the severance charges discussed above
totaling $0.4 million, or $0.01 per diluted share.
FFO for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $38.1 million, or
$0.78 per diluted share, compared to a deficit of $28.2 million, or
$0.63 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The Company’s reported FFO for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
included the net gain discussed above totaling $20.9 million, offset by
the non-cash impairment charges discussed above of $35.1 million,
resulting in total net charges included in FFO of $14.2 million, or
$0.29 per diluted share. The Company’s reported FFO for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 included the impairment and severance charges
discussed above totaling $76.7 million, offset by the income items
discussed above totaling $2.3 million, resulting in total net charges
included in FFO of $74.4 million, or $1.67 per diluted share.
Mature (Same Store) Community Data
Average economic occupancy at the Company’s 43 mature (same store)
communities, containing 15,713 apartment units, was 95.8% and 94.4% for
the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Total revenues for the mature communities increased 0.1% and total
operating expenses decreased 0.4% during the third quarter of 2010,
compared to the third quarter of 2009, resulting in a 0.4% increase in
same store net operating income ("NOI”). The average monthly rental rate
per unit decreased 1.7% during the third quarter of 2010, compared to
the third quarter of 2009.
On a sequential basis, total revenues for the mature communities
increased 1.6% and total operating expenses increased 5.2%, producing a
0.8% decrease in same store NOI for the third quarter of 2010, compared
to the second quarter of 2010. On a sequential basis, the average
monthly rental rate per unit increased 0.9%. For the third quarter of
2010, average economic occupancy at the mature communities was 95.8%,
compared to 95.2% for the second quarter of 2010.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, average economic occupancy
at the Company’s mature communities was 95.3%, compared to 93.8% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Total revenues for the mature communities decreased 2.5% and total
operating expenses increased 0.1% for the nine months ended September
30, 2010, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
resulting in a 4.4% decrease in same store NOI. The average monthly
rental rate per unit decreased 4.6% for the nine months ended September
30, 2010, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Same store NOI is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. A
reconciliation of same store NOI to the comparable GAAP financial
measure is included in the financial data (Table 2) accompanying this
press release. Information on same store NOI and average rental rate per
unit by geographic market is also included in the financial data (Table
3) accompanying this press release.
Development Activity
Post Park® in Hyattsville, MD remains in lease-up and as of October 29,
2010 is 81% leased. In addition, the Company’s previously announced
development of the second phase of its Post Carlyle Square™ apartment
community in Alexandria, VA is underway with a total projected
development cost of $95 million.
Financing Activity
Debt Financing, Leverage and Line Capacity
In October 2010, as previously announced, the Company completed its
public offering of $150.0 million of senior unsecured notes bearing
interest at 4.75% and due 2017. The Company used a portion of the net
proceeds from this offering to fully repay amounts outstanding under its
revolving credit facilities. The Company intends to use the remaining
net proceeds to repay its outstanding $100.5 million of 7.70% senior
notes at maturity on December 20, 2010, and for general corporate
purposes.
Total debt and preferred equity as a percentage of undepreciated real
estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) was
41.4% at September 30, 2010, and variable rate debt as a percentage of
total debt was 3.0% as of that same date.
As of October 29, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$116 million. The Company had no outstanding borrowings and letters of
credit totaling $2.2 million under its combined $430 million unsecured
lines of credit.
Computations of debt ratios and reconciliations of the ratios to the
appropriate GAAP measures in the Company’s financial statements are
included in the financial data (Table 4) accompanying this press release.
Other Capital Markets Activity
The Company has an at-the-market common equity program for the sale of
up to four million shares of common stock. The Company expects to use
this program as an additional source of capital and liquidity and to
maintain the strength of its balance sheet. Sales under this program
will be dependent upon a variety of factors, including, among others,
market conditions, the trading price of the Company’s common stock and
potential use of proceeds. No shares were issued under this program in
the third quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, and
through the date of this press release, the Company has sold 41,313
shares, at an average price per share of $27.70, producing net proceeds
of $1.1 million under this program. There can be no assurance that the
Company will sell additional shares under this program.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company
repurchased preferred stock with a liquidation value of approximately
$0.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively, under a rule 10b5-1
repurchase program.
Other Investment Activity
Atlanta Condominium Project – Recent Developments
As previously announced, in September 2010, the residential portion of
the mixed-use development in Atlanta, Georgia, consisting of 129 luxury
condominium units, sponsored by the Company and its partner, was
conveyed to the residential partners in full redemption of their
interest in the mixed-use limited partnership that was developing the
project. In addition, a subsidiary of the Company acquired the lenders’
interest in the residential loan facilities relating to the Atlanta
condominium project and adjacent land and infrastructure for aggregate
consideration of $49.8 million.
Subsequent to its acquisition of the residential loans, and in exchange
for the release of the guarantors of the residential loans, the Company
acquired all remaining interests in the entities that held the Atlanta
condominium project and adjacent land and infrastructure that were not
previously held by the Company. The Company now wholly owns the Atlanta
condominium project and adjacent land and infrastructure and
consolidates the Atlanta condominium project for financial reporting
purposes as of September 30, 2010.
As a result of the above-described transactions, the Company recorded a
net gain of $26.4 million, partially offset by an impairment loss during
the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of $5.5 million on the project in
connection with the acquisition of the underlying residential loans and
condominium asset at fair value.
Condominium Activity
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company sold 28 condominium units
at its Austin condominium project for aggregate gross sales revenue of
$28.5 million. As of October 29, 2010, the Company has, in the
aggregate, closed 42 units at the Austin condominium project and had 33
units under contract. As of that same date, the Company had 5 units
under contract at the Atlanta condominium project. The Atlanta
condominium project is expected to open in November 2010. There can be
no assurance that condominium units under contract will close.
The Company recognized incremental net gains in FFO, excluding
impairment charges, of $1.2 million from condominium sales activities
during the third quarter of 2010, compared to $0.4 million during the
third quarter of 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
the Company recognized incremental net gains in FFO, excluding
impairment charges, of $2.1 million from condominium sales activities,
compared to incremental losses of $1.6 million during the same period in
2009.
Land Sale Activity
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company sold a land parcel located
in Citrus Park, Florida for gross proceeds of $3.8 million. No gain or
loss was recognized, as the land was previously recorded as held for
sale at fair value.
Revised 2010 Outlook
The estimates and assumptions presented below are forward-looking and
are based on the Company’s current and expected future view of the
apartment and condominium markets and of general economic conditions, as
well as other risks outlined below under the caption "Forward Looking
Statements.” There can be no assurance that the Company’s actual results
will not differ materially from the estimates set forth below. The
Company assumes no obligation to update this guidance in the future.
Based on its current outlook, the Company anticipates that FFO for the
full year 2010 will be in the range of $1.36 to $1.40 per diluted share,
excluding the impact of net charges discussed below. This compares to
the Company’s previous outlook for FFO issued last quarter of $1.24 to
$1.32 per diluted share, excluding net charges.
As discussed above, the Company recorded $14.2 million of impairment
charges, net of gains, in FFO during the first nine months of 2010.
After the impact of net charges, the Company anticipates that FFO for
the full year 2010 will be in the range of $1.07 to $1.11 per diluted
share. This compares to the Company’s previous outlook issued last
quarter for FFO, after net charges, of $0.38 to $0.50 per diluted share.
The above estimates of FFO assume the following expected changes in same
store NOI for 2010, compared to 2009:
|
|
|
|
Current
Outlook
|
|
|
Previously
Issued Outlook
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
-1.5% to -1.7%
|
|
|
-2.0% to -2.3%
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
0.1% to 0.3%
|
|
|
0.4% to 0.7%
|
|
Net operating income (NOI)
|
|
|
-2.6% to -3.1%
|
|
|
-3.7% to -4.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above estimates of FFO assume a current outlook for expected net
income attributable to on-going condominium activities of $0.04 to $0.05
per diluted share for the full year 2010, which compares to a previously
issued outlook for net income attributable to condominium activities of
$0.02 to $0.04 per diluted share (each excluding the impact of net
charges discussed above).
The above estimates of FFO reflect the October 2010 public unsecured
note offering discussed previously, including the expected use of a
portion of the proceeds to repay debt maturing in December 2010, and the
interim investment of such proceeds in cash and cash equivalents.
Other than the start of the second phase of Post Carlyle Square™, the
Company’s outlook does not assume any additional development starts in
2010, nor does it assume any acquisitions or dispositions of apartment
communities in 2010.
Other current assumptions regarding the Company’s overhead expenses are
substantially unchanged from those made in its previously issued 2010
outlook.
Supplemental Financial Data
The Company also produces Supplemental Financial Data that includes
detailed information regarding the Company’s operating results,
investment activity, financing activity and balance sheet. This
Supplemental Financial Data is considered an integral part of this
earnings release and is available on the Company’s website. The
Company’s Earnings Release and the Supplemental Financial Data are
available through the For Investors/Financial Reports/Quarterly and
Other Reports section of the Company’s website at www.postproperties.com.
The ability to access the attachments on the Company’s website requires
the Adobe Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded at http://get.adobe.com/reader/.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Defined Terms
The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures and other defined
terms in this press release and in its Supplemental Financial Data
available on the Company’s website. The non-GAAP financial measures
include FFO, Adjusted Funds from Operations ("AFFO”), net operating
income, same store capital expenditures, and certain debt statistics and
ratios. The definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures are
summarized below and on page 21 of the Supplemental Financial Data. The
Company believes that these measures are helpful to investors in
measuring financial performance and/or liquidity and comparing such
performance and/or liquidity to other REITs.
Funds from Operations – The Company uses FFO as an operating
measure. The Company uses the NAREIT definition of FFO. FFO is defined
by NAREIT to mean net income (loss) available to common shareholders
determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from
extraordinary items and sales of depreciable operating property, plus
depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after
adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures all
determined on a consistent basis in accordance with GAAP. FFO presented
in the Company’s press release and Supplemental Financial Data is not
necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies
because not all real estate companies use the same definition. The
Company’s FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use
the current NAREIT definition.
Accounting for real estate assets using historical cost accounting under
GAAP assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably
over time. NAREIT stated in its April 2002 White Paper on Funds from
Operations that "since real estate asset values have historically risen
or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have
considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies
that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.”
As a result, the concept of FFO was created by NAREIT for the REIT
industry to provide an alternate measure. Since the Company agrees with
the concept of FFO and appreciates the reasons surrounding its creation,
the Company believes that FFO is an important supplemental measure of
operating performance. In addition, since most equity REITs provide FFO
information to the investment community, the Company believes that FFO
is a useful supplemental measure for comparing the Company’s results to
those of other equity REITs. The Company believes that the line on its
consolidated statement of operations entitled "net income available to
common shareholders” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO.
Adjusted Funds From Operations – The Company also uses adjusted funds
from operations ("AFFO”) as an operating measure. AFFO is defined as FFO
less operating capital expenditures and after adjusting for the impact
of non-cash straight-line, long-term ground lease expense, non-cash
impairment charges, non-cash income (loss) related to mark-to-market of
interest rate swap agreements, non-cash debt extinguishment costs and
preferred stock redemption costs. The Company believes that AFFO is an
important supplemental measure of operating performance for an equity
REIT because it provides investors with an indication of the REIT’s
ability to fund its operating capital expenditures through earnings. In
addition, since most equity REITs provide AFFO information to the
investment community, the Company believes that AFFO is a useful
supplemental measure for comparing the Company to other equity REITs.
The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of
operations entitled "net income available to common shareholders” is the
most directly comparable GAAP measure to AFFO.
Property Net Operating Income ("NOI”) – The Company uses property
NOI, including same store NOI and same store NOI by market, as an
operating measure. NOI is defined as rental and other revenues from real
estate operations less total property and maintenance expenses from real
estate operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). The
Company believes that NOI is an important supplemental measure of
operating performance for a REIT’s operating real estate because it
provides a measure of the core operations, rather than factoring in
depreciation and amortization, financing costs and general and
administrative expenses generally incurred at the corporate level. This
measure is particularly useful, in the opinion of the Company, in
evaluating the performance of geographic operations, same store
groupings and individual properties. Additionally, the Company believes
that NOI, as defined, is a widely accepted measure of comparative
operating performance in the real estate investment community. The
Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of
operations entitled "net income” is the most directly comparable GAAP
measure to NOI.
Same Store Capital Expenditures – The Company uses same store
annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures as
cash flow measures. Same store annually recurring and periodically
recurring capital expenditures are supplemental non-GAAP financial
measures. The Company believes that same store annually recurring and
periodically recurring capital expenditures are important indicators of
the costs incurred by the Company in maintaining its same store
communities on an ongoing basis. The corresponding GAAP measures include
information with respect to the Company’s other operating segments
consisting of communities stabilized in the prior year, lease-up
communities, rehabilitation properties, sold properties and commercial
properties in addition to same store information. Therefore, the Company
believes that the Company’s presentation of same store annually
recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is necessary
to demonstrate same store replacement costs over time. The Company
believes that the most directly comparable GAAP measure to same store
annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is
the line on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows entitled
"property capital expenditures,” which also includes revenue generating
capital expenditures.
Debt Statistics and Debt Ratios – The Company uses a number of
debt statistics and ratios as supplemental measures of liquidity. The
numerator and/or the denominator of certain of these statistics and/or
ratios include non-GAAP financial measures that have been reconciled to
the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. These debt
statistics and ratios include: (1) an interest coverage ratio; (2) a
fixed charge coverage ratio; (3) total debt as a percentage of
undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s
share of debt); (4) total debt plus preferred equity as a percentage of
undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s
share of debt); (5) a ratio of consolidated debt to total assets; (6) a
ratio of secured debt to total assets; (7) a ratio of total unencumbered
assets to unsecured debt; and (8) a ratio of consolidated income
available to debt service to annual debt service charge. A number of
these debt statistics and ratios are derived from covenants found in the
Company’s debt agreements, including, among others, the Company’s senior
unsecured notes. In addition, the Company presents these measures
because the degree of leverage could affect the Company’s ability to
obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes. The
Company uses these measures internally as an indicator of liquidity and
the Company believes that these measures are also utilized by the
investment and analyst communities to better understand the Company’s
liquidity.
Average Economic Occupancy – The Company uses average economic
occupancy as a statistical measure of operating performance. The Company
defines average economic occupancy as gross potential rent less vacancy
losses, model expenses and bad debt expenses divided by gross potential
rent for the period, expressed as a percentage.
Conference Call Information
The Company will hold its quarterly conference call on Tuesday, November
2, at 10:00 a.m. EST. The telephone numbers are 877-681-3377 for US and
Canada callers and 719-325-4929 for international callers. The access
code is 5060344. The conference call will be open to the public and can
be listened to live on Post’s website at www.postproperties.com
under For Investors/Event Calendar. The replay will begin at 1:00 p.m.
EST on Tuesday, November 2, and will be available until Monday, November
8, at 11:59 p.m. EST. The telephone numbers for the replay are
888-203-1112 for US and Canada callers and 719-457-0820 for
international callers. The access code for the replay is 5060344. A
replay of the call also will be archived on Post’s website under For
Investors/Audio Archive. The financial and statistical information that
will be discussed on the call is contained in this press release and the
Supplemental Financial Data. Both documents will be available through
the For Investors/Financial Reports/Quarterly & Other Reports section of
the Company’s website at www.postproperties.com.
About Post
Post Properties, founded more than 39 years ago, is a leading developer
and operator of upscale multifamily communities. The Company’s mission
is delivering superior satisfaction and value to its residents,
associates, and investors, with a vision of being the first choice in
quality multifamily living. Operating as a real estate investment trust
("REIT”), the Company focuses on developing and managing Post® branded
resort-style garden and high density urban apartments. Post Properties
is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, and has operations in nine markets
across the country.
Post Properties has interests in 20,207 apartment units in 56
communities, including 1,747 apartment units in five communities held in
unconsolidated entities, 396 apartment units in one community currently
in lease-up and 344 apartment units in one community currently under
construction. The Company is also developing and selling 277 luxury
for-sale condominium homes in two communities through a taxable REIT
subsidiary.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this press release and other written or oral
statements made by or on behalf of the Company, may constitute
"forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal
securities laws. Statements regarding future events and developments and
the Company’s future performance, as well as management’s expectations,
beliefs, plans, estimates or projections relating to the future, are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. Examples of
such statements in this press release include, expectations regarding
future operating conditions, including the Company’s current outlook as
to expected funds from operations, same store operating income,
condominium profits, and overhead expenses for the year ending December
31, 2010, anticipated development activities (including the projected
costs, projected yield, timing and anticipated potential sources of
financing of projected future development activities), expectations
regarding the timing and delivery of completed for-sale condominium
homes, expectations regarding offerings of the Company’s common stock
and the use of proceeds thereof and expectations regarding the use of
proceeds from the Company’s offering of senior unsecured notes. All
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual events to differ materially from
those projected. Management believes that these forward-looking
statements are reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance
on such statements. These statements are based on current expectations
and speak only as of the date of such statements. The Company undertakes
no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or
otherwise.
The following are some of the factors that could cause the Company’s
actual results and its expectations to differ materially from those
described in the Company’s forward-looking statements: the success of
the Company’s business strategies discussed in its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in subsequent filings with
the SEC; future local and national economic conditions, including
changes in job growth, interest rates, the availability of mortgage and
other financing and related factors; uncertainties associated with the
global capital markets, including the continued availability of
traditional sources of capital and liquidity and related factors;
conditions affecting ownership of residential real estate and general
conditions in the multi-family residential real estate market; the
effects on the financial markets of the emergency stabilization actions
of the U.S. government, U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve and other
governmental and regulatory bodies; uncertainties associated with the
Company’s real estate development and construction; uncertainties
associated with the timing and amount of apartment community sales; the
Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to make required
payments associated with its debt financing; the effects of the
Company’s leverage on its risk of default and debt service requirements;
the impact of a downgrade in the credit rating of the Company’s
securities; the effects of a default by the Company or its subsidiaries
on an obligation to repay outstanding indebtedness, including
cross-defaults and cross-acceleration under other indebtedness or the
responsibility for limited recourse guarantees; the effects of covenants
of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ mortgage indebtedness on
operational flexibility and default risks; the Company’s ability to
maintain its current dividend level; uncertainties associated with the
Company’s condominium for-sale housing business, including the timing
and volume of condominium sales; the impact of any additional charges
the Company may be required to record in the future related to any
impairment in the carrying value of its assets; the impact of
competition on the Company’s business, including competition for
residents in the Company’s apartment communities and buyers of the
Company’s for-sale condominium homes and development locations; the
effectiveness of interest rate hedging contracts; the Company’s ability
to succeed in new markets; the costs associated with compliance with
laws requiring access to the Company’s properties by persons with
disabilities; the impact of the Company’s ongoing litigation with the
Equal Rights Center and the U.S. Department of Justice regarding the
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act as well as the
impact of other litigation; the effects of losses from natural
catastrophes in excess of insurance coverage; uncertainties associated
with environmental and other regulatory matters; the costs associated
with moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation; the Company’s
ability to control joint ventures, properties in which it has joint
ownership and corporations and limited partnership in which it has
partial interests; the Company’s ability to renew leases or relet units
as leases expire; the Company’s ability to continue to qualify as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code; and the effects of changes in
accounting policies and other regulatory matters detailed in the
Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Other
important risk factors regarding the Company are included under the
caption "Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and may be discussed in subsequent
filings with the SEC. The risk factors discussed in Form 10-K under the
caption "Risk Factors” are specifically incorporated by reference into
this press release.
|
Financial Highlights
|
|
(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share and unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
72,895
|
|
$
|
69,388
|
|
$
|
212,869
|
|
|
$
|
207,684
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
21,670
|
|
$
|
50,226
|
|
$
|
(16,948
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common shareholders
and unitholders (Table 1)
|
|
$
|
40,269
|
|
$
|
13,857
|
|
$
|
38,144
|
|
|
$
|
(28,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
48,670
|
|
|
44,220
|
|
|
48,446
|
|
|
|
44,151
|
|
|
Weighted average shares and units outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
48,841
|
|
|
44,419
|
|
|
48,618
|
|
|
|
44,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER COMMON SHARE DATA - DILUTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common shareholders
and unitholders (Table 1) (1)
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
(0.63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Funds (deficit) from operations per share was computed using
weighted average shares and units outstanding, including the
impact of dilutive securities totaling 39 for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 134 and 0 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These dilutive
securities were antidilutive to the computation of income (loss)
per share, as the Company reported a loss from continuing
operations for these periods under generally accepted accounting
principles. Additionally, basic and diluted weighted average
shares and units included the impact of non-vested shares and
units totaling 212 and 226 for the three months ended and 204 and
215 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, for the computation of funds from operations per
share. Such non-vested shares and units are considered in the
income (loss) per share computations under generally accepted
accounting principles using the "two-class method.”
|
|
|
|
Table 1
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income Available to Common Shareholders to Funds
From Operations Available to Common Shareholders and Unitholders
|
|
(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
21,670
|
|
|
$
|
50,226
|
|
|
$
|
(16,948
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
Noncontrolling interests - Operating Partnership
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Depreciation on consolidated real estate assets, net
|
|
|
18,167
|
|
|
|
18,284
|
|
|
|
54,349
|
|
|
|
52,862
|
|
|
Depreciation on real estate assets held in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
Gains on sales of apartment communities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(54,624
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(79,366
|
)
|
|
Gains on sales of condominiums
|
|
|
(1,184
|
)
|
|
|
(1,069
|
)
|
|
|
(2,319
|
)
|
|
|
(1,041
|
)
|
|
Incremental gains (losses) on condominium sales (1)
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
|
|
(1,632
|
)
|
|
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders and unitholders
|
|
$
|
40,269
|
|
|
$
|
13,857
|
|
|
$
|
38,144
|
|
|
$
|
(28,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds (deficit) from operations - per share and unit - diluted (2)
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
(0.63
|
)
|
|
Weighted average shares and units outstanding - diluted (2)
|
|
|
49,053
|
|
|
|
44,684
|
|
|
|
48,957
|
|
|
|
44,578
|
|
|
|
|
(1) For condominium conversion projects, the Company recognizes
incremental gains on condominium sales in FFO, net of provision
for income taxes, to the extent that net sales proceeds, less
costs of sales and expenses, from the sale of condominium units
exceeds the greater of their fair value or net book value as of
the date the property is acquired by the Company’s taxable REIT
subsidiary. For condominium development projects, gains on
condominium sales in FFO are equivalent to gains reported under
GAAP.
|
|
|
|
(2) Diluted weighted average shares and units include the impact
of dilutive securities totaling 39 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 134 and 0 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These dilutive
securities were antidilutive to the computation of income (loss)
per share, as the Company reported a loss from continuing
operations for these periods under generally accepted accounting
principles. Additionally, basic and diluted weighted average
shares and units included the impact of non-vested shares and
units totaling 212 and 226 for the three months and 204 and 215
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, for the computation of funds (deficit) from
operations per share. Such non-vested shares and units are
considered in the income (loss) per share computations under
generally accepted accounting principles using the "two-class
method.”
|
|
|
|
Table 2
|
|
Reconciliation of Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) to GAAP
Net Income
|
|
(Unaudited; In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Total same store NOI
|
|
$
|
33,903
|
|
|
$
|
33,759
|
|
|
$
|
34,192
|
|
|
$
|
101,294
|
|
|
$
|
105,940
|
|
|
Property NOI from other operating segments
|
|
|
4,811
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
3,453
|
|
|
|
10,434
|
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
Consolidated property NOI
|
|
|
38,714
|
|
|
|
35,182
|
|
|
|
37,645
|
|
|
|
111,728
|
|
|
|
107,619
|
|
|
Add (subtract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(18,623
|
)
|
|
|
(18,787
|
)
|
|
|
(18,643
|
)
|
|
|
(55,737
|
)
|
|
|
(54,388
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(13,646
|
)
|
|
|
(12,978
|
)
|
|
|
(12,561
|
)
|
|
|
(38,820
|
)
|
|
|
(39,397
|
)
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
(2,097
|
)
|
|
|
(2,342
|
)
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(3,927
|
)
|
|
|
(3,892
|
)
|
|
|
(3,967
|
)
|
|
|
(12,570
|
)
|
|
|
(12,265
|
)
|
|
Investment and development
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
|
(2,886
|
)
|
|
Other investment costs
|
|
|
(669
|
)
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
(1,828
|
)
|
|
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
Impairment, severance and other charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
(35,091
|
)
|
|
|
(35,091
|
)
|
|
|
(10,049
|
)
|
|
Gains on condominium sales activities, net
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate entities, net
|
|
|
18,258
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
18,554
|
|
|
|
(74,577
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
Net gain on early extinguishment of indebtedness
|
|
|
2,845
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,845
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
23,595
|
|
|
|
(2,472
|
)
|
|
|
(33,753
|
)
|
|
|
(11,285
|
)
|
|
|
(86,796
|
)
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54,861
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
84,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
23,595
|
|
|
$
|
52,389
|
|
|
$
|
(33,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3
|
|
Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) and Average Rental Rate per
Unit by Market
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
Q3 '10
|
|
Q3 '10
|
|
Q3 '10
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
vs. Q3 '09
|
|
vs. Q2 '10
|
|
% Same
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
% Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Store NOI
|
|
Rental and other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
$
|
15,961
|
|
$
|
15,818
|
|
$
|
15,653
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
10,560
|
|
|
10,192
|
|
|
10,352
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
10,634
|
|
|
10,766
|
|
|
10,414
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
7,762
|
|
|
7,839
|
|
|
7,713
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
4,199
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
3,396
|
|
|
3,467
|
|
|
3,394
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
3,074
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Total rental and other revenues
|
|
|
59,115
|
|
|
59,070
|
|
|
58,164
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance expenses (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
7,049
|
|
|
7,610
|
|
|
7,009
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
3,647
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
5,161
|
|
|
5,147
|
|
|
4,708
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
2,977
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
945
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
517
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
25,212
|
|
|
25,311
|
|
|
23,972
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
8,208
|
|
|
8,644
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
6,672
|
|
|
6,545
|
|
|
6,889
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
19.7
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
5,619
|
|
|
5,706
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
4,888
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
2,420
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
(9.5
|
)%
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
690
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
(7.8
|
)%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
Total same store NOI
|
|
$
|
33,903
|
|
$
|
33,759
|
|
$
|
34,192
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average rental rate per unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
$
|
1,071
|
|
$
|
1,037
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
1,813
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
3,591
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Total average rental rate per unit
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3 (con’t)
|
|
Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) and Average Rental Rate per
Unit by Market
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Change
|
|
Rental and other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
$
|
47,210
|
|
$
|
48,295
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
30,998
|
|
|
30,529
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
31,411
|
|
|
32,937
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
23,197
|
|
|
23,652
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
12,605
|
|
|
13,391
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
10,073
|
|
|
10,775
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
8,640
|
|
|
9,208
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
7,131
|
|
|
7,005
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
3,616
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
Total rental and other revenues
|
|
|
174,872
|
|
|
179,408
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance expenses (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
20,969
|
|
|
21,275
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
11,184
|
|
|
10,756
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
14,530
|
|
|
14,352
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
8,967
|
|
|
9,391
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
5,188
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
4,316
|
|
|
4,062
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
3,854
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
73,578
|
|
|
73,468
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
26,241
|
|
|
27,020
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
19,814
|
|
|
19,773
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
16,881
|
|
|
18,585
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
14,230
|
|
|
14,261
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
|
8,532
|
|
(13.1
|
)%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
5,757
|
|
|
6,713
|
|
(14.2
|
)%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
4,786
|
|
|
5,203
|
|
(8.0
|
)%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
3,912
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
Total same store NOI
|
|
$
|
101,294
|
|
$
|
105,940
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average rental rate per unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
$
|
1,104
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
1,789
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
Dallas
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
|
New York
|
|
|
3,603
|
|
|
3,837
|
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
Total average rental rate per unit
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4
|
|
Computation of Debt Ratios
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Total real estate assets per balance sheet
|
|
$
|
2,059,461
|
|
|
$
|
2,099,926
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company share of real estate assets held in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
71,857
|
|
|
|
92,185
|
|
|
Company share of accumulated depreciation - assets held in
unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
10,187
|
|
|
|
8,324
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation per balance sheet
|
|
|
673,982
|
|
|
|
605,694
|
|
|
Total undepreciated real estate assets (A)
|
|
$
|
2,815,487
|
|
|
$
|
2,806,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt per balance sheet
|
|
$
|
1,013,972
|
|
|
$
|
1,056,499
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
59,601
|
|
|
|
106,969
|
|
|
Total debt (adjusted for joint venture partners' share of debt) (B)
|
|
$
|
1,073,573
|
|
|
$
|
1,163,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted
for joint venture partners' share of debt) (B÷A)
|
|
|
38.1
|
%
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt per balance sheet
|
|
$
|
1,013,972
|
|
|
$
|
1,056,499
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
59,601
|
|
|
|
106,969
|
|
|
Preferred shares at liquidation value
|
|
|
92,963
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
Total debt and preferred equity (adjusted for joint venture
partners' share of debt) (C)
|
|
$
|
1,166,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,258,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and preferred equity as a % of undepreciated real
estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners' share of debt) (C÷A)
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
