Regulatory News:
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of
Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this
announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness
and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever
arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents
of this announcement.
UNITED COMPANY RUSAL PLC
(Incorporated under the laws of
Jersey with limited liability)
(Stock Code: 486)
Key highlights of the quarter ended 31 March 2012
-
Revenue increased by 2.7% to USD2,882 million in the first quarter of
2012 as compared to USD2,806 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.
-
Primary aluminium and alloys sales volumes increased by 8.8% due to
the volumes shifted from the fourth quarter of 2011 while average
realised premiums over LME aluminium price increased by 3.8% achieving
record high level of USD165 per tonne.
-
Production of value-added products reached 37% of total output in the
three months ended 31 March 2012.
-
Aluminium segment cost per tonne1 in the first quarter of
2012 remained almost flat to that in the last quarter of 2011 due to
the strict cost control despite upwards pressure from strong oil price
and appreciating currency.
-
Adjusted EBITDA2 decreased by 38.0% to USD237 million for
the three months ended 31 March 2012 as compared to USD382 million for
the last quarter of 2011, with a corresponding decrease in Adjusted
EBITDA margin from 13.6% to 8.2% primarily due to weaker LME aluminium
price performance in respective quotation period.
-
Due to the successful debt restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2011
interest expenses decreased by 20.2% to USD146 million in the first
quarter of 2012 as compared to USD183 million in the same period of
2011.
-
Recurring Net Profit3 of United Company Rusal Plc (the "Company”
or "UC
RUSAL”, together with its subsidiaries, the "Group”)
(Paris:RUSAL) (Paris:RUAL) decreased to USD112 million for the three
months ended 31 March 2012 from USD366 million for the fourth quarter
of 2011.
-
Net profit comprised USD74 million for the three months ended 31 March
2012 as compared to the net loss of USD974 million for the last
quarter of 2011.
-
The Board of Directors (the "Board”) has appointed Mr. Barry
Cheung as Chairman of the Board with effect from 16 March 2012. As the
Chairman of the Board, Mr. Cheung, a non-executive director of the
Board since 2010, will have an expanded role in providing leadership
and guidance for UC RUSAL’s growth strategy, especially in China and
the rest of Asia, and for the Company’s continued commitment to
promoting excellence in corporate governance
-
On 30 March 2012, the Company exercised the option to introduce a
period of up to 12 months, during which financial covenants under the
existing international and Russian facilities (where applicable) do
not apply. The Company has also made an early repayment of
approximately USD130 million under the existing credit facilities out
of its own cash in the first quarter of 2012 and, as a result, has no
further short-term debt obligations until the end of 2012.
____________________
1 Please refer to page 4
2 Please refer to page 11
3 Please refer to page 14
Statement of the CEO
The first quarter of 2012 has proved to be a tough test for the
aluminium industry with the global demand for the metal slowing down and
the aluminium price weakening. Alongside the continued cost inflation,
the challenging market environment weighed heavily on the profitability
of aluminium producers.
With the aluminium price nearing the cash-cost of production for many
higher cost producers, the Company’s continued focus on cost control and
modernisation programme has resulted in the aluminium segment cost per
tonne increasing by only 0.1% as compared to the first quarter of 2011
despite significant external pressures such as rising oil price and
rouble appreciation. Production volumes of aluminium also remained firm.
However, growth in the physical sales of aluminium was offset by price
decreases. Our interest expenses have also decreased significantly, and
with the early debt repayment made, UC RUSAL does not have further
short-term debt obligations until the end of 2012.
In response to continued uncertainty in the global economy, UC RUSAL is
currently considering the curtailment of 300-600 thousand tonnes of
high-cost smelting capacity starting from the second half of 2012, with
corresponding alumina production to be possibly idled in order to
achieve the production capacity balance.
Even though near-term market prospects are still rather clouded, there
are positive signals, with aluminium consumption growth in the US,
strengthening of auto sales in Germany, and a strong rise in aluminium
consumption in Japan, as well as high level of premiums, that allow us
to look optimistically into the future. Long-term fundamentals for
aluminium remain strong, and UC RUSAL, being the world’s leading
aluminium producer, has taken the steps necessary to overcome challenges
of today to be well-positioned for tomorrow.
Oleg Deripaska
CEO
11 May 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial and Operating Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
quarter on
|
|
Quarter
|
|
quarter on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
quarter, %
|
|
ended 31
|
|
quarter, %
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended
|
|
31
March
|
|
(1Q to 1Q)
|
|
December
|
|
(1Q to 4Q)
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
unaudited
|
|
unaudited
|
|
|
|
unaudited
|
|
|
|
Key operating data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(‘000 tonnes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium
|
|
1,049
|
|
1,014
|
|
3.5%
|
|
1,060
|
|
(1.0%)
|
|
Alumina
|
|
2,034
|
|
1,996
|
|
1.9%
|
|
2,082
|
|
(2.3%)
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
3,622
|
|
3,139
|
|
15.4%
|
|
3,288
|
|
10.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key pricing and performance data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(‘000 tonnes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of primary aluminium and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alloys
|
|
1,095
|
|
971
|
|
12.8%
|
|
1,006
|
|
8.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD per tonne)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium segment cost per tonne4
|
|
1,963
|
|
1,962
|
|
0.1%
|
|
1,952
|
|
0.6%
|
|
Aluminium price per tonne quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on the LME5
|
|
2,177
|
|
2,503
|
|
(13.0%)
|
|
2,090
|
|
4.2%
|
|
Average premiums over LME price
|
|
165
|
|
153
|
|
7.8%
|
|
159
|
|
3.8%
|
|
Alumina price per tonne6
|
|
316
|
|
391
|
|
(19.2%)
|
|
329
|
|
(4.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key selected data from the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consolidated interim condensed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
statement of income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2,882
|
|
2,993
|
|
(3.7%)
|
|
2,806
|
|
2.7%
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
237
|
|
682
|
|
(65.2%)
|
|
382
|
|
(38.0%)
|
|
margin (% of revenue)
|
|
8.2%
|
|
22.8%
|
|
NA
|
|
13.6%
|
|
NA
|
|
Net profit/(loss) for the period
|
|
74
|
|
451
|
|
(83.6%)
|
|
(974)
|
|
NA
|
|
margin (% of revenue)
|
|
2.6%
|
|
15.1%
|
|
NA
|
|
(34.7%)
|
|
NA
|
|
Adjusted Net (Loss)/Profit for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the period
|
|
(90)
|
|
288
|
|
NA
|
|
110
|
|
NA
|
|
margin (% of revenue)
|
|
(3.1%)
|
|
9.6%
|
|
NA
|
|
3.9%
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Net Profit
|
|
112
|
|
493
|
|
(77.3%)
|
|
366
|
|
(69.4%)
|
|
margin (% of revenue)
|
|
3.9%
|
|
16.5%
|
|
NA
|
|
13.0%
|
|
NA
|
_____________________
|
4
|
|
For any period, "Aluminium segment cost per tonne” is calculated as
aluminium segment revenue less aluminium segment results less
amortisation and depreciation divided on sales volume of the
aluminium segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Aluminium price per tonne quoted on the LME representing the average
of the daily closing official London Metals Exchange ("LME”) prices
for each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
The average alumina price per tonne provided in this table is based
on the daily closing spot prices of alumina according to Non-ferrous
Metal Alumina Index FOB Australia USD per tonne.
|
|
|
|
|
Key selected data from consolidated interim condensed statement of
financial position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
|
|
31 March 2012
|
|
31 December 2011
|
|
Change quarter on year end, %
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
26,860
|
|
25,345
|
|
6.0%
|
|
Total working capital7
|
|
2,245
|
|
2,367
|
|
(5.2%)
|
|
Net Debt8
|
|
11,126
|
|
11,049
|
|
0.7%
|
Key selected data from consolidated interim condensed statement of
cash flows
|
|
|
Quarter ended
|
|
Change quarter on quarter, %
|
|
|
|
31 March
2012
|
|
31 March 2011
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows generated from operating activities
|
|
350
|
|
589
|
|
(40.6%)
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
(121)
|
|
(98)
|
|
23.5%
|
|
of which CAPEX9
|
|
(126)
|
|
(112)
|
|
12.5%
|
______________________
|
7
|
|
Total working capital is defined as inventories plus trade and other
receivables minus trade and other payables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Net Debt is calculated as Total Debt less cash and cash equivalents
as at the end of any period. Total Debt refers to UC RUSAL’s loans
and borrowings and bonds outstanding at the end of any period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
CAPEX is defined as payment for the acquisition of property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets.
|
Overview of trends in industry and business
Aluminium industry for the three months ended 31 March 2012
Despite weak aluminum consumption in Europe in the first quarter of
2012, overall global aluminium consumption for the period continues to
grow.
Global aluminium consumption in the first quarter of 2012 grew by 5.0%
year-on-year to 11.2 million tonnes
UC RUSAL continued to see some moderate growth in the first half of
2012, but it envisages both the fundamental demand for aluminium as well
as aluminium prices will be strengthened in the second half of 2012 as a
result of continuing global economic expansion in China and the US, as
well as continued cutbacks in global aluminium production.
Aluminium price decreased during the first quarter of 2012 to an average
of USD2,177 per tonne, which was down by 13.0% compared to the same
period of last year.
On a regional basis, demand in the US improved following an increase in
consumption driven by the automotive and engineered products sectors.
For the three months ended 31 March 2012, demand for aluminium rose by
7.3% year-on-year.
In Europe, German auto sales also grew strongly in the first quarter of
2012. However, there was still a slowdown in aluminium consumption in
the second half of 2011 due to the escalation of the financial crisis in
Europe. Thus, aluminium consumption in Europe in the first quarter of
2012 decreased by 4.0% compared to the same period of 2011.
Asian economic activity for the first quarter of 2012 was dominated by
Japan’s recovery in aluminium consumption driven by the growth in
infrastructure development after the earthquake and tsunami in Japan in
March 2011, as well as the recovery in automobile production, had led to
an aluminium consumption increase of 8.0% for the first three months of
2012 compared to the same period of 2011.
In China, aluminum consumption during the first quarter of 2012
continued to be strong and rose by 9.0% year-on-year. China was a net
importer of aluminim during three months of 2012 with 150 thousand
tonnes of net import.
Investors’ appetite for aluminium remained firm during the first quarter
of 2012 due to the positive aluminium forward curve and low financial
costs to store aluminium. Investors continue buying aluminium for nearby
delivery and making a forward sale at the same time to capitalise on the
price structure.
Rising orders to draw aluminium from warehouses to keep it off-warrant
have created tightness in the physical delivery market and, as a result,
higher premiums for the lightweight metal.
Premiums in the US climbed in the first quarter of 2012 to the highest
level since 1997. During the same period, the In-Warehouse Duty Paid
Premium in Rotterdam was quoted at a range of USD200 per tonne and the
US Midwest Premium traded at US10 cents per lb. The Asian premium (CIF
main Japanese port) remained firm at USD119-120 per tonne. Metal
generally became more readily available in the major markets in the
first three months of 2012 due to slower economic activity and year-end
stock adjustments, with large deliveries made to LME warehouses,
incentivised by comparatively strong storage premiums.
Aluminium industry 2012 outlook
Despite flat aluminium demand in some regions in the last six months,
the aluminium industry remains well above the 2009 recession levels,
thereby challenging expectations of a severe contraction predicted by
many market participants. UC RUSAL expects that the uncertainties seen
in 2011 and the first quarter of 2012, namely the current Eurozone
financial crisis and slowdown or hard landing in the growth in aluminium
demand in China may continue to dominate the outlook for the metal
markets in the months to come, with evidence of potential recovery in
the second half of 2012.
Therefore, our view is that aluminium consumption in Europe will remain
negative in the first half of 2012, offset by moderately higher US
demand and continued recovery in the growth in the aluminium consumption
in China in 2012.
UC RUSAL expects that global primary aluminium consumption will reach
48.2 million tonnes (7.0% growth) in 2012, with China as the largest
growing market (11.0% growth), followed by India (10.0% growth), Japan
(5.0% growth), North America (5.0% growth) and Latin America (5.0%
growth). Consumption growth in Europe in 2012 will be flat to the 2011
levels.
As a consequence, UC RUSAL forecasts the global aluminium market to be
almost balanced in 2012.
Business review
Aluminium production
Total aluminium output amounted to 1,049 thousand tonnes for the first
quarter of 2012, as compared to 1,014 thousand tonnes for that of the
same period in 2011. The increase was mostly due to increased production
at Kubal of Sweden and certain Siberian (Russia) smelters.
Alumina production
Total alumina output amounted to 2,034 thousand tonnes for the first
quarter of 2012, and demonstrated a 1.9% increase as compared to the
same period in 2011. The increase in the volume was due to increased
production at QAL of Australia and Nikolaev alumina refinery in Ukraine.
Bauxite production
Aggregate bauxite production was 3,622 thousand tonnes for the
three-month period ended 31 March 2012, as compared to 3,139 thousand
tonnes for the same period in 2011 and demonstrated a 15.4% growth. The
main factor of growth over the respective period was increased
production at Compagnie de Bauxite de Kindia (CBK) in Guinea, Bauxite
Co. De Guyana (BCGI) in Guyana, Windalco Ewarton plant in Jamaica and
North Urals in Russia.
Financial Overview
Revenue
|
|
|
Quarter ended
31 March 2012
|
|
Quarter ended
31 March 2011
|
|
Quarter ended
31 December 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
sales price
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
sales price
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
sales price
|
|
|
|
million
|
|
kt
|
|
(USD/tonne)
|
|
million
|
|
kt
|
|
(USD/tonne)
|
|
million
|
|
kt
|
|
(USD/tonne)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aluminium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and alloys
|
|
2,501
|
|
1,095
|
|
2,284
|
|
2,508
|
|
971
|
|
2,583
|
|
2,376
|
|
1,006
|
|
2,362
|
|
Sales of alumina
|
|
147
|
|
450
|
|
327
|
|
167
|
|
464
|
|
360
|
|
156
|
|
476
|
|
328
|
|
Sales of foil
|
|
63
|
|
16
|
|
3,938
|
|
73
|
|
18
|
|
4,056
|
|
80
|
|
21
|
|
3,810
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
171
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
245
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
194
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
2,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue decreased by USD111 million or 3.7% to USD2,882 million in the
first quarter of 2012, as compared to USD2,993 million for the
corresponding period in 2011.
Revenue from sales of primary aluminium and alloys basically remained
unchanged, as the increase of 12.8% in the aggregate volume of aluminium
sold (1,095 thousand tonnes for the first quarter of 2012 as compared to
971 thousand tonnes for the same period of 2011) was compensated for
with a 13.0% decrease in the LME average aluminium price for the
respective period (to an average of USD2,177 per tonne from USD2,503 per
tonne).
Other revenue consists of sales of bauxites, energy, other products
(soda, hydrate, silicon, coke and other). Other revenue decreased by
30.2% to USD171 million in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to
USD245 million for same period of 2011, primarily due to the disposal in
September 2011 of a 50.0% share in transportation business in Kazakhstan.
Cost of sales
The following table shows the breakdown of UC RUSAL’s cost of sales for
the three months ended 31 March 2012 and 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended
31 March
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
Change 1Q to 1Q, %
|
|
Share of costs, %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of alumina
|
|
339
|
|
232
|
|
46.1%
|
|
13.8%
|
|
Cost of bauxite
|
|
158
|
|
119
|
|
32.8%
|
|
6.4%
|
|
Cost of other raw materials and other costs
|
|
869
|
|
669
|
|
29.9%
|
|
35.3%
|
|
Energy costs
|
|
676
|
|
629
|
|
7.5%
|
|
27.5%
|
|
Depreciation and amortisation
|
|
131
|
|
113
|
|
15.9%
|
|
5.3%
|
|
Personnel expenses
|
|
241
|
|
219
|
|
10.0%
|
|
9.8%
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
30
|
|
26
|
|
15.4%
|
|
1.2%
|
|
Change in asset retirement obligations
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
100.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Net change in provisions for inventories
|
|
17
|
|
(3)
|
|
NA
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
2,460
|
|
2,004
|
|
22.8%
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales increased by USD456 million, or 22.8%, to USD2,460 million
for the three months ended 31 March 2012, as compared to USD2,004
million for the corresponding period in 2011. The increase was driven by
the growth in the aggregate volumes of aluminium sold for 12.8% (or 124
thousand tonnes) as well as the increase in alumina and other raw
materials purchase prices (such as fuel oil for approximately 20.0%,
coke for approximately 25.0%, caustic soda for approximately 13.0%) and
transportation tariffs.
Gross profit
As a result of the foregoing factors, UC RUSAL reported a gross profit
of USD422 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with USD989
million for the same period of 2011, representing gross margins over the
periods of 14.6% and 33.0%, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA and Results from operating activities
|
|
|
Quarter ended
31 March
|
|
Change quarter on quarter, % (1Q
to 1Q)
|
|
Quarter ended
31 December
|
|
Change quarter on quarter, % (1Q
to 4Q)
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
activities
|
|
74
|
|
442
|
|
(83.3%)
|
|
158
|
|
(53.2%)
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortisation and depreciation
|
|
138
|
|
120
|
|
15.0%
|
|
134
|
|
3.0%
|
|
Impairment of non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets
|
|
25
|
|
120
|
|
(79.2%)
|
|
93
|
|
(73.1%)
|
|
Loss on disposal of property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plant and equipment
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3)
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
237
|
|
682
|
|
(65.2%)
|
|
382
|
|
(38.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, defined as results from operating activities adjusted
for amortisation and depreciation, impairment charges and loss on
disposal of property, plant and equipment, decreased to USD237 million
in the first quarter of 2012, as compared to USD682 million for the
corresponding period in 2011. The factors that contributed to the
decrease in Adjusted EBITDA margin were the same that influenced the
operating results of the Company.
Results from operating activities decreased in the first quarter of 2012
by 83.3% to USD74 million, as compared to USD442 million for the
corresponding period in 2011, representing operating margins of 2.6% and
14.8%, respectively. The decrease in margins resulted mainly from the
decrease in the LME aluminium price as well as continuing pressure on
the costs side.
Finance income and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended
|
|
1Q to 1Q,
|
|
|
|
31 March
|
|
%
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans and deposits
|
|
4
|
|
2
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
—
|
|
691
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives
|
|
—
|
|
672
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
Revaluation of financial instruments linked to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share price of Norilsk Nickel
|
|
—
|
|
27
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
Change in other derivatives instruments
|
|
—
|
|
(8)
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
Interest income on provisions
|
|
4
|
|
23
|
|
(82.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
716
|
|
(98.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on bank loans and company loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wholly repayable within five years, bonds and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bank charges, including
|
|
(163)
|
|
(380)
|
|
(57.1%)
|
|
Nominal interest expense
|
|
(146)
|
|
(183)
|
|
(20.2%)
|
|
Excess of effective interest rate charge over
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nominal interest rate charge on restructured debt
|
|
—
|
|
(171)
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
Bank charges
|
|
(17)
|
|
(26)
|
|
(34.6%)
|
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
(38)
|
|
(33)
|
|
15.2%
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
(43)
|
|
—
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives
|
|
(42)
|
|
—
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Revaluation of financial instruments linked to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share price of Norilsk Nickel
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Change in other derivatives instruments
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Interest expense on provisions
|
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
|
(20.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248)
|
|
(418)
|
|
(40.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income decreased by USD708 million to USD8 million in the first
quarter of 2012 as compared to USD716 million for the corresponding
period in 2011. Finance income in the first quarter of 2011 was
primarily represented by a gain on the change in fair value of
derivative financial instruments of USD691 million. For details please
refer to Results Announcement for the three months ended 31 March 2011
(accessible on UC RUSAL’s website at http://www.rusal.ru/en/investors/hkse).
Finance expenses decreased by 40.7% to USD248 million in the first
quarter of 2012 as compared to USD418 million for the corresponding
period in 2011. The nominal interest expense decreased by 20.2% from
USD183 million in the first quarter of 2011 to USD146 million in the
first quarter in 2012, as a result of reduction in the principal amount
payable to international and Russian lenders and in overall interest
margin reduction.
Share of profits/(losses) of associates and jointly controlled
entities
|
|
|
Quarter ended 31
March
|
|
Change
1Q to 1Q,
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of profits/(losses) of Norilsk Nickel, with
|
|
245
|
|
(125)
|
|
NA
|
|
Effective shareholding of
|
|
30.28%
|
|
27.00%
|
|
|
|
Share of profits
|
|
245
|
|
225
|
|
8.9%
|
|
Result from changes in the underlying net assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
following treasury share transactions
|
|
—
|
|
(350)
|
|
NA
|
|
Share of losses of other associates
|
|
(5)
|
|
(13)
|
|
(61.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of profits/(losses) of associates
|
|
240
|
|
(138)
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of profits of jointly controlled entities
|
|
23
|
|
20
|
|
15.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share in the results of associates comprised USD240 million of profits
in the first quarter of 2012 and USD138 million of losses for the
corresponding period in 2011. Share in results of associates in both
periods resulted primarily from the Company’s investment in Norilsk
Nickel, which amounted to USD245 million of profits and USD125 million
of losses for the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, respectively. The
Company’s share of Norilsk Nickel results for the first quarter of 2011
included a loss of USD350 million recognised by the Company as a result
of a decrease in the carrying value of Norilsk Nickel’s net assets. This
change in carrying value was attributable to sales and purchases by
Norilsk Nickel of its own shares.
Net profit for the period
As a result of the above, the Company recorded a net profit of USD74
million for the first quarter of 2012, as compared to a net profit of
USD451 million for the same period of 2011.
Adjusted and Recurring Net Profit
|
|
|
Quarter ended
31 March
|
|
Change quarter on quarter, % (1Q
to 1Q)
|
|
Quarter ended
31 December
|
|
Change quarter on quarter, % (1Q
to 4Q)
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted Net Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit for the period
|
|
74
|
|
451
|
|
(83.6%)
|
|
(974)
|
|
NA
|
|
Adjusted for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of profits and other gains and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
losses attributable to Norilsk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel, net of tax effect (9.0%), with
|
|
(203)
|
|
118
|
|
NA
|
|
701
|
|
NA
|
|
Share of profits, net of tax
|
|
(202)
|
|
(205)
|
|
(1.5%)
|
|
(256)
|
|
(21.1%)
|
|
Result from changes in the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
underlying net assets following
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
treasury share transactions
|
|
—
|
|
350
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
889
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
Revaluation of financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
instruments linked to the share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
price of Norilsk Nickel
|
|
(1)
|
|
(27)
|
|
(96.3%)
|
|
68
|
|
NA
|
|
Change in fair value of embedded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
derivative financial instruments,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of tax (20.0%)
|
|
14
|
|
(572)
|
|
NA
|
|
(30)
|
|
NA
|
|
Excess of effective interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charge over nominal interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charge on restructured debt
|
|
—
|
|
171
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
320
|
|
(100.0%)
|
|
Impairment of non-current assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of tax
|
|
25
|
|
120
|
|
(79.2%)
|
|
93
|
|
(73.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Net (Loss)/ Profit
|
|
(90)
|
|
288
|
|
NA
|
|
110
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add back:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of profits of Norilsk Nickel,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of tax
|
|
202
|
|
205
|
|
(1.5%)
|
|
256
|
|
(21.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Net Profit
|
|
112
|
|
493
|
|
(77.3%)
|
|
366
|
|
(69.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Net Profit for any period is defined as the net profit adjusted
for the net effect of the Company’s investment in Norilsk Nickel, the
net effect of embedded derivative financial instruments, the excess of
effective interest rate charges over nominal interest rate charges on
restructured debt and the net effect of non-current assets impairment.
The Company generated Adjusted Net Loss in the amount of USD90 million
for the first quarter of 2012 as compared with Adjusted Net Profit of
USD288 million for the same period of 2011, primarily due to the
decrease in the Company’s result from operating activities.
Recurring Net Profit for any period is defined as Adjusted Net Profit
plus the Company’s net effective share in Norilsk Nickel results. The
management considers that this measurement is an important indicator of
the Company’s profitability and that it is consistent with the way the
market forecasts and evaluates the Company’s performance.
Segment reporting
The Group has four reportable segments, as described in the Annual
Report, which are the Group’s strategic business units: Aluminium,
Alumina, Energy, Mining and Metals. These business units are managed
separately and results of their operations are reviewed by the CEO on a
regular basis.
The core segments are Aluminium and Alumina.
|
|
|
Quarter ended 31 March
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Aluminium
|
|
Alumina
|
|
Aluminium
|
|
Alumina
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue
|
|
2,552
|
|
571
|
|
2,557
|
|
567
|
|
Segment result
|
|
244
|
|
(81)
|
|
521
|
|
19
|
|
Segment EBITDA9
|
|
354
|
|
(55)
|
|
613
|
|
42
|
|
Segment EBITDA margin
|
|
13.9%
|
|
(9.6%)
|
|
24.0%
|
|
7.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditure
|
|
91
|
|
30
|
|
73
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____________________
9 Segment EBITDA for any period is defined as segment result
adjusted for amortisation and depreciation for the segment.
For the three months ended 31 March 2012 and 2011, segment result
margins (calculated as the percentage of segment profit to total segment
revenue) from continuing operations were 13.9% and 24.0% for the
aluminium segment, and negative 9.6% versus positive 7.4% for the
alumina segment. Key drivers for the decrease in margin in the aluminium
segment are disclosed in "Revenue”, "Cost of sales” and "Results from
operating activities and Adjusted EBITDA” sections above. Detailed
segment reporting can be found in the consolidated interim condensed
financial information.
Capital expenditure
UC RUSAL recorded total capital expenditures of USD126 million for the
three months ended 31 March 2012. UC RUSAL’s capital expenditure for the
three months ended 31 March 2012 was aimed at maintaining existing
production facilities.
|
|
|
Quarter ended 31 March
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
(USD million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth project
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taishet smelter
|
|
25
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pot rebuilds costs
|
|
37
|
|
46
|
|
Re-equipment
|
|
64
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditure
|
|
126
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The BEMO project companies utilise the project financing proceeds to
make necessary contributions to the ongoing construction projects and do
not require contributions from the joint ventures partners at this time.
Norilsk Nickel investment
The market value of UC RUSAL’s stake in Norilsk Nickel was USD8,882
million as at 31 March 2012, as compared to USD12,557 million as at 31
March 2011 due to a negative share price performance between the
relevant dates.
At the date of this consolidated interim condensed financial
information, the Group was unable to obtain consolidated interim
financial information for Norilsk Nickel as at and for the three-month
period ended 31 March 2012. Consequently, the Group estimated its share
in the profits and other comprehensive income of Norilsk Nickel for the
three-month period ended 31 March 2012 based on publicly available
information reported by Norilsk Nickel. The information used as a basis
for these estimates is incomplete in many aspects. Once the consolidated
interim financial information for Norilsk Nickel becomes available, it
is compared to the management´s estimates. If there are significant
differences, adjustments may be required to restate the Group´s share in
profit, other comprehensive income and the carrying value of the
investment in Norilsk Nickel which has been previously reported.
The Company notes that its auditor, ZAO KPMG, has provided a qualified
conclusion in its review of the unaudited consolidated interim condensed
financial information of the Company for the three months ended 31 March
2012 as it was unable to obtain and review the consolidated interim
financial information of Norilsk Nickel. An extract from the review
report provided by ZAO KPMG on the consolidated interim condensed
financial information of the Company dated 11 May 2012 is as follows:
"Basis for Qualified Conclusion
We were unable to obtain and review consolidated interim financial
information of the Group’s equity investee, OJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel ("Norilsk
Nickel”), supporting the Group’s share in the profit and other
comprehensive income of that investee of USD245 million and USD6
million, respectively, for the three-month period ended 31 March 2012
and the carrying value of the Group’s investment stated at USD10,535
million as at 31 March 2012. Had we been able to complete our review
procedures in respect of interests in associates, matters might have
come to our attention indicating that adjustments might be necessary to
this consolidated interim condensed financial information.
As a result of the consolidated financial statements of Norilsk Nickel
for the year ended 31 December 2011 not being available, we were unable
to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence in relation to the
carrying value of the Group’s investment in Norilsk Nickel stated at
USD9,247 million as at 31 December 2011. As a result, we were unable to
determine whether adjustments might have been found necessary in respect
of the profit for the period reported in the consolidated condensed
statement of income, other comprehensive income reported in the
consolidated condensed statement of comprehensive income and the net
cash flows from operating activities reported in the consolidated
condensed statement of cash flows. Our opinion on the consolidated
financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2011 dated
16 March 2012 was modified accordingly. Our opinion on the current
period’s consolidated interim condensed financial information is also
modified because of the possible effects of this matter on the
comparability of the current period’s figures and the corresponding
figures.
Qualified Conclusion
Based on our review, except for the possible effects of the matters
described in the first and second paragraphs of the Basis for Qualified
Conclusion, and except for the possible effects on the corresponding
figures as at 31 December 2011 and the possible effects on the
comparability of the current period’s figures of the matter described in
the second paragraph of the Basis for Qualified Conclusion, nothing has
come to our attention that causes us to believe that the consolidated
interim condensed financial information as at 31 March 2012 and for the
three-month period then ended is not prepared, in all material respects,
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standard IAS 34 Interim
Financial Reporting.
Other matter
Without further qualifying our conclusion, we draw attention to the fact
that the corresponding figures presented for the three-month period
ended 31 March 2011 include the effects of the adjustments described in
Note 10 to the consolidated interim condensed financial information. We
have reviewed the adjustments described in Note 10 that were applied to
restate the consolidated interim condensed financial information as at
and for the three-month period ended 31 March 2011. Based on our review,
such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied.”
Consolidated interim condensed financial information
The unaudited consolidated interim condensed financial information of UC
RUSAL for the three months ended 31 March 2012 was approved by the
Directors of UC RUSAL on 11 May 2012, and reviewed by the Audit
Committee. It has also been filed with the French Autorité des
marchés financiers on the date hereof and is accessible on UC
RUSAL’s website at http://www.rusal.ru/en/investors/
financial_stat.aspx.
Audit committee
The Board established an audit committee to assist it in providing an
independent view of the effectiveness of the Company’s financial
reporting process, internal control and risk management systems and to
oversee the audit process. The audit committee consists of a majority of
independent non-executive Directors. Members of the audit committee are
as follows: three independent non-executive Directors, being Dr. Peter
Nigel Kenny (Chairman), Mr. Philip Lader and Ms. Elsie Leung Oi-sie and
two non-executive Directors, Mr. Dmitry Troshenkov (resigned on 11 May
2012)/Mr. Dmitry Yudin (appointed on 11 May 2012), and Mr. Dmitry
Razumov. On 11 May 2012, the audit committee has reviewed the financial
results of the Company for the quarter ended 31 March 2012.
Material events over the first quarter of 2012 and since the end of
that period
The following is a summary of the key events that have taken place over
the first quarter of 2012 and since the end of that period. All
information regarding key events that has been made public by the
Company for the three months ended 31 March 2012 and since the end of
that period pursuant to legislative or regulatory requirements,
including announcements and press releases, is available on the
Company’s website (www.rusal.com).
|
|
|
|
|
18 January 2012
|
|
UC RUSAL announced an update on the refinancing facility signed on
29 September 2011. According to the revised terms and conditions
of the refinancing facility, the Company will have an option to
introduce a period of up to 12 months, during which financial
covenants under the existing international and Russian facilities
(where applicable) do not apply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 February 2012
|
|
UC RUSAL announced the production results for the year ended 31
December 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 March 2012
|
|
UC RUSAL announced that Mr. Barry Cheung, an independent
non-executive Director of the Company, was elected by a majority
vote as the Chairman of the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 March 2012
|
|
UC RUSAL announced the financial results for the year ended 31
December 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2012
|
|
UC RUSAL introduced a period of up to 12 months in 2012-2013, during
which financial covenants of the refinancing facility signed on 29
September 2011 do not apply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 April 2012
|
|
UC RUSAL announced that North United Aluminium, the Shenzhen-based
joint venture of UC RUSAL and China North Industries Corporation
(NORINCO), specialised on aluminium, alloys and other non-ferrous
metals trading, started operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 May 2012
|
|
UC RUSAL announced that Mr. Dmitry Yudin has been appointed as a
non-executive director and a member of the Audit Committee of the
Company with effect from 11 May 2012 replacing Mr. Dmitry Troshenkov
who resigned with effect from 11 May 2012; and that on 11 May 2012,
Mr. Anatoly Tikhonov has tendered his resignation as a non-executive
director of the Company with effect from 15 June 2012.
|
Compliance
Pursuant to Article L.451-1-2 IV of the French Code monétaire et
financier, the Company is required to publish quarterly financial
information for the first and third quarters of the financial year.
The Directors confirm that the information contained in this
announcement does not contain any false statements, misleading
representations or material omissions, and all of them jointly and
severally accept responsibility as to the truthfulness, accuracy and
completeness of the content of this announcement.
Forward-looking statements
This announcement contains statements about future events, projections,
forecasts and expectations that are forward-looking statements. Any
statement in this announcement that is not a statement of historical
fact is a forward-looking statement that involves known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. These risk and uncertainties include those
discussed or identified in the prospectus for UC RUSAL. In addition,
past performance of UC RUSAL cannot be relied on as a guide to future
performance. UC RUSAL makes no representation on the accuracy and
completeness of any of the forward-looking statements, and, except as
may be required by applicable law, assumes no obligations to supplement,
amend, update or revise any such statements or any opinion expressed to
reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or in UC RUSAL’s
expectations, or changes in factors affecting these statements.
Accordingly, any reliance you place on such forward-looking statements
will be at your sole risk.
|
By Order of the board of directors of
United Company RUSAL Plc
Vladislav Soloviev
Director
|
11 May 2012
As at the date of this announcement, our executive directors are Mr.
Oleg Deripaska, Mr. Vladislav Soloviev, Mr. Alexander Livshits, Ms. Vera
Kurochkina, Mr. Petr Sinshinov and Mr. Maxim Sokov, our non-executive
directors are Mr. Maksim Goldman, Mr. Dmitry Afanasiev, Mr. Len
Blavatnik, Mr. Ivan Glasenberg, Mr. Dmitry Razumov, Mr. Anatoly
Tikhonov, Mr. Artem Volynets and Mr. Dmitry Yudin, and our independent
non-executive directors are Dr. Peter Nigel Kenny, Mr. Philip Lader, Mr.
Barry Cheung Chun-yuen (Chairman) and Ms. Elsie Leung Oi-sie.
All announcements and press releases published by the Company are
available on its website under the links http://www.rusal.ru/en/investors/info.aspx
and http://www.rusal.ru/en/press-center/press-releases.aspx,
respectively.
