First State Bancorporation (NASDAQ:FSNM):
OVERVIEW:
-
Core deposits increased by $158.9 million.
-
Bolstering the allowance for loan losses results in loss for the
quarter of $24.4 million.
-
Net interest margin of 3.27% for the quarter.
-
Loans decreased by $50.5 million, improving liquidity position.
-
Signed definitive agreement to sell Colorado branches.
-
TARP application was withdrawn to maintain independence.
First State Bancorporation ("First State”) (NASDAQ:FSNM) today announced
a first quarter 2009 loss of $24.4 million, or $(1.19) per diluted
share, compared to net income of $3.9 million or $0.19 per diluted share
for the same period in 2008. The net loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 resulted primarily from the level of provision for loan
losses due to increased non-performing assets and charge-offs.
"Due primarily to our proactive approach to identifying problem loans,
this was a difficult quarter from a credit perspective, but we are
beginning to see signs that real estate values in our markets have
stabilized,” stated Michael R. Stanford, President and Chief Executive
Officer. "After reaching a pinnacle in January, we saw a positive trend
in our provision and the volume of new problem loans in February and
March, so we are cautiously optimistic that the worst of our credit
issues are behind us. We withdrew our TARP application as this source of
capital no longer made sense for the Company and our shareholders. The
sale of our Colorado branches will not only provide us with a much
needed boost in our capital ratios, roughly equivalent to a capital
injection of $60 million, but will also allow us to refocus our efforts
on our legacy New Mexico market and to prepare for eventual growth in
the Arizona market. We are delighted with the recent increase in our
core deposits and expect further improvements in our liquidity and
capital ratios through the steady run off of our remaining loan
portfolio in Utah and Colorado, combined with an expected further
increase in deposits. Our capacity for lending going forward will be
focused on meeting our customer needs in New Mexico and Arizona,”
continued Stanford.
At March 31, 2009, the loans to be sold in the Colorado transaction were
classified as held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet. We
reclassified approximately $406.6 million of net loans from held for
investment to available for sale, consisting of $415.1 million in total
loans, offset by the associated allowance for loan losses of
approximately $8.5 million. Deposits and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase of $480 million and $3.1 million, respectively,
and premises and equipment of $19.1 million are also reflected as held
for sale on the consolidated balance sheet.
|
INCOME STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS:
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited-$ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
First Quarter Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
41,230
|
|
|
$
|
52,969
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
14,878
|
|
|
|
21,564
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
26,352
|
|
|
|
31,405
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(33,300
|
)
|
|
|
(3,900
|
)
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(6,948
|
)
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
6,212
|
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
27,059
|
|
|
|
27,761
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(24,373
|
)
|
|
|
5,956
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(24,373
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,925
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(1.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
( 1.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,468,411
|
|
|
|
20,135,032
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,468,411
|
|
|
|
20,157,739
|
|
|
FINANCIAL RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
(2.88
|
)%
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
Return on average equity
|
|
(63.69
|
)%
|
|
4.99
|
%
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
75.19
|
%
|
|
73.80
|
%
|
|
Operating expenses to average assets
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
9.28
|
%
|
|
Leverage ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
8.47
|
%
|
|
Bank Subsidiary
|
|
6.48
|
%
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
8.90
|
%
|
|
10.71
|
%
|
|
Bank Subsidiary
|
|
9.02
|
%
|
|
10.61
|
%
|
|
BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS:
|
|
(Unaudited – $ in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
$ Change from December 31, 2008
|
|
$ Change from March 31, 2008
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,549,825
|
|
$
|
3,415,049
|
|
$
|
3,460,038
|
|
$
|
134,776
|
|
|
$
|
89,787
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,704,048
|
|
|
2,754,589
|
|
|
2,610,192
|
|
|
(50,541
|
)
|
|
|
93,856
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
506,326
|
|
|
488,996
|
|
|
493,772
|
|
|
17,330
|
|
|
|
12,554
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
2,727,169
|
|
|
2,522,542
|
|
|
2,580,601
|
|
|
204,627
|
|
|
|
146,568
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
497,226
|
|
|
453,319
|
|
|
466,447
|
|
|
43,907
|
|
|
|
30,779
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,229,943
|
|
|
2,069,223
|
|
|
2,114,154
|
|
|
160,720
|
|
|
|
115,789
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
597,400
|
|
|
596,060
|
|
|
349,988
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
247,412
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
135,301
|
|
|
159,254
|
|
|
316,144
|
|
|
(23,953
|
)
|
|
|
(180,843
|
)
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
6.59
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
$
|
15.72
|
|
$
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9.13
|
)
|
|
Tangible book value per share
|
|
$
|
5.86
|
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
$
|
8.52
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.66
|
)
|
Net interest income was $26.4 million for the first quarter of 2009
compared to $31.4 million for the same quarter of 2008. Our net interest
margin was 3.27% and 4.12% for the first quarter of 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The decrease in the net interest margin is primarily due to the decrease
in the federal funds target rate that began in September 2007 and
continued through December 2008. The Federal Reserve Bank has lowered
the federal funds target rate by 500 basis points, 400 of which occurred
in calendar 2008, leading to an equal decrease in the prime lending
rate. A significant portion of our loan portfolio is tied directly to
the prime lending rate and adjusts daily when there is a change in the
prime lending rate. The rates paid on customer deposits are influenced
more by competition in our markets and tend to lag behind Federal
Reserve Bank action in both timing and magnitude, particularly in this
very low rate environment. In conjunction with the Federal Reserve
Bank’s lower target rates, we have lowered selected deposit rates, but
remain competitive in the markets we serve. Our asset sensitivity
combined with the fact that deposit repricing is slow and minimal
because of the low rate environment has had a negative impact on the
margin. The increase in the level of non-accrual loans has also
negatively impacted the net interest margin. Over the last year, and due
to overall market conditions, our overall balance sheet mix has changed.
We are currently targeting a loan to deposit ratio below 100%, but due
to the strong loan growth in the first half of 2008, combined with an
increasingly difficult deposit generating environment, the total amount
of loans that exceed our deposits has grown, requiring us to utilize
additional funding sources beginning in the second half of 2008. This
has resulted in an increase in average borrowings of $217 million since
March 31, 2008, and contributed to the compression in our net interest
margin. Although our borrowing rates have decreased, our core deposits,
including non-interest bearing accounts provide for a lower overall
funding source. In addition, in the first quarter of 2009, in order to
increase our liquidity position, we issued additional brokered deposits
and borrowed additional funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB”),
resulting in an increase in lower yielding cash on the balance sheet. We
have also lengthened the maturities of our newly issued brokered
deposits and FHLB borrowings over the next two to three years to further
strengthen our liquidity position. Although these activities may cause
further margin compression, we believe that the improvement in our
current liquidity position clearly outweighs the potential margin
compression that could occur over the next few quarters. The extent of
future changes in our net interest margin will depend on the amount and
timing of any Federal Reserve rate changes, our overall liquidity
position, our non-performing asset levels, our ability to manage the
cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and our ability to stay
competitive in the markets we serve.
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2008
|
|
Balance beginning of period
|
|
$
|
79,707
|
|
|
$
|
31,712
|
|
|
$
|
31,712
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
33,300
|
|
|
|
71,618
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(13,261
|
)
|
|
|
(23,623
|
)
|
|
|
(1,116
|
)
|
|
Allowance related to loans available for sale
|
|
|
(8,469
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Balance end of period
|
|
$
|
91,277
|
|
|
$
|
79,707
|
|
|
$
|
34,496
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for investment
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Accruing loans – 90 days past due
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
4,139
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans
|
|
|
163,585
|
|
|
|
114,138
|
|
|
|
49,748
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
163,587
|
|
|
$
|
118,277
|
|
|
$
|
50,301
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
17,754
|
|
|
|
18,894
|
|
|
|
16,551
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
181,341
|
|
|
$
|
137,171
|
|
|
$
|
66,852
|
|
|
Potential problem loans
|
|
$
|
246,200
|
|
|
$
|
130,884
|
|
|
$
|
71,862
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
First State’s provision for loan losses was $33.3 million for the first
quarter of 2009 compared to $3.9 million for the same quarter of 2008.
The increase is primarily a result of an increase in net charge-offs, an
increase in non-performing loans, and growth of the portfolio from March
31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. First State’s allowance for loan losses was
4.01% and 1.33% of total loans held for investment at March 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2008, respectively. The allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans decreased from 67% at December 31, 2008 to 56% at
March 31, 2009, partially due to the reclassification of $8.5 million of
the allowance attributable to the loans available for sale included in
the anticipated sale of the Colorado branches, all of which are
performing credits. Also, the net increase in non-performing loans
during the quarter was $45.3 million, while the provision for loan
losses resulting from the Company’s assessment of reserves needed on
those additional non-performing loans exceeded the net charge-offs for
the quarter by $20.0 million, further contributing to the decrease in
the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans.
Approximately 95% of the Company’s non-performing loans are secured by
real estate, where fair value is more determinable based on appraisals,
which decreases the reserves needed on those loans, compared to other
categories where the collateral is less tangible.
"In January and February of 2009 we received and reviewed updated
financial and other information from many of our commercial borrowers,
which led to a substantial increase in our non-performing and potential
problem assets in the first two months of the quarter,” commented H.
Patrick Dee, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. "As a
result, we increased our provision for loan losses, adding over $20
million to our allowance for loan losses, above the amount we charged
off during the quarter. Due to the slight improvement in many of our
asset quality metrics that we saw in March 2009, we do not believe that
the results in the first quarter are necessarily an indicator of future
trends. As of March 31, 2009, our allowance for loan losses included $55
million that is not included in our capital ratios,” continued Dee.
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
$
|
3,763
|
|
$
|
2,992
|
|
|
$
|
771
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
Credit and debit card transaction fees
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on investment securities
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,634
|
|
$
|
6,212
|
|
|
$
|
3,422
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
The increase in service charges on deposit accounts is primarily due to
an increase in NSF fees charged per occurrence, a reduction in fees
waived from deposit accounts, and an increase in account analysis fees.
The increase in gain on investment securities is due to an increase in
sales of investment securities during the period. During the first
quarter of 2009, certain securities were sold at a gain as part of our
continued efforts to bolster capital. The 2008 loss on investment
securities includes an other-than-temporary charge of $333,000 on FHLMC
preferred stock, held in the available for sale portfolio and acquired
as part of the acquisition of Front Range Capital Corporation in March
2007.
The decrease in other non-interest income is primarily due to a decrease
in official check outsourcing fee income as official check processing
was brought in-house in the fourth quarter of 2008. The decrease is also
attributable to the redemption of VISA stock that occurred in the first
quarter of 2008.
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
11,522
|
|
$
|
13,517
|
|
$
|
(1,995
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
Legal, accounting, and consulting
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
FDIC insurance premiums
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
|
3,103
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,059
|
|
$
|
27,761
|
|
$
|
(702
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
The decrease in salaries and benefits is primarily due to a decrease in
headcount. At March 31, 2009, full time equivalent employees totaled
775, compared to 873 at March 31, 2008. The decrease is also due to a
decrease in share-based compensation expense, a decrease in incentive
bonus expense, a decrease in self-insured medical and dental claims, and
a decrease in expenses related to temporary help.
The increase in legal, accounting, and consulting is primarily due to
legal and investment banking costs incurred in connection with the
pending sale of our Colorado branches, and consultation costs related to
a staffing model that was prepared in connection with our continued
efforts to control non-interest expenses.
The increase in other real estate owned is primarily due to an increase
in write-downs of properties to reflect their fair values and an
increase in losses on sales of properties.
The increase in FDIC insurance premiums is due to new FDIC assessment
rates that took effect on January 1, 2009, as well as an increase in
deposits. In February 2009, the FDIC adopted an additional final rule
which includes an additional uniform two basis point increase as well as
other adjustments that will take effect on April 1, 2009. In conjunction
with the February ruling, the FDIC also adopted an interim rule,
imposing a twenty basis point emergency special assessment on June 30,
2009, to be collected on September 30, 2009. The interim rule also
permits the imposition of an additional emergency special assessment
after June 30, 2009, of up to ten basis points. Based on this
rulemaking, we expect our 2009 FDIC insurance premiums to be
approximately $12 million, including the twenty basis point emergency
assessment. This estimate could change, depending on our level of
deposits or further rulemaking.
There was no income tax expense for the three months ended March 31,
2009, as the net operating loss and other net deferred tax assets were
fully offset by a deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
In conjunction with its first quarter earnings release, First State will
host a conference call to discuss these results, which will be simulcast
over the Internet on Monday, April 27, 2009 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
To listen to the call and view the slide presentation, visit www.fcbnm.com,
Investor Relations. The conference call will be available for replay
beginning April 27, 2009 through May 6, 2009 at www.fcbnm.com,
Investor Relations.
First State Bancorporation is a New Mexico based commercial bank holding
company (NASDAQ:FSNM). First State provides services, through its
subsidiary First Community Bank, to customers from a total of 60
branches located in New Mexico, Colorado, and Arizona. On Friday, April
24, 2009, First State’s stock closed at $2.39 per share.
The following table provides selected information for average balances
and average yields for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and March 31,
2008:
|
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
First Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES:
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
2,738,421
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,558,587
|
|
7.42
|
%
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
477,809
|
|
4.48
|
%
|
|
|
500,683
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds sold
|
|
|
50,397
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
|
|
8,222
|
|
3.67
|
%
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
3,266,627
|
|
5.12
|
%
|
|
|
3,067,492
|
|
6.95
|
%
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,127,701
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
2,089,306
|
|
3.28
|
%
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
2,787,462
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
2,612,574
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest-bearing demand accounts
|
|
|
461,007
|
|
|
|
|
458,648
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
154,707
|
|
|
|
|
316,651
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,426,646
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,412,119
|
|
|
The following tables provide information regarding loans and deposits
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and the year ended
December 31, 2008:
|
LOANS: (Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
342,963
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
356,769
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
354,723
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
Real estate – commercial
|
|
|
1,146,975
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,172,952
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
|
963,664
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
|
Real estate – one- to four-family
|
|
|
270,114
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
270,613
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
242,302
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
Real estate – construction
|
|
|
882,733
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
896,117
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
982,847
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
38,732
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
41,474
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
45,905
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
22,531
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
16,664
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
20,751
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,704,048
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,754,589
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,610,192
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
DEPOSITS:
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Non-interest bearing
|
|
$
|
497,226
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
453,319
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
466,447
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
302,056
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
296,732
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
331,072
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
Money market savings accounts
|
|
|
562,060
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
|
|
471,011
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
|
|
471,704
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
Regular savings
|
|
|
103,952
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
100,691
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
109,610
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
|
|
|
328,136
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
325,110
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
372,136
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
Certificates of deposit greater than $100,000
|
|
|
485,527
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
471,826
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
712,726
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
CDARS Reciprocal deposits
|
|
|
210,920
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
212,249
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
64,307
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
Brokered deposits
|
|
|
237,292
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
191,604
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
52,599
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,727,169
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,522,542
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,580,601
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Certain statements in this news release are forward-looking statements,
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act”).
These statements are based on management’s current expectations or
predictions of future results or events. We make these forward-looking
statements in reliance on the safe harbor provisions provided under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in
this news release which relate to performance, development or activities
that we expect or anticipate will or may happen in the future, are
forward-looking statements. The discussions regarding our growth
strategy, expansion of operations in our markets, acquisitions,
dispositions, competition, loan and deposit growth, timing of new branch
openings, capital expectations, and response to consolidation in the
banking industry include forward-looking statements. Other
forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of
forward-looking words such as "believe,” "expect,” "may,” "might,”
"will,” "should,” "seek,” "could,” "approximately,” "intend,” "plan,”
"estimate,” or "anticipate” or the negative of those words or other
similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and
are based on numerous assumptions. They are not guarantees of future
performance. A number of important factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in the forward-looking statement. Some
factors include changes in interest rates, local business conditions,
government regulations, loss of key personnel or inability to hire
suitable personnel, faster or slower than anticipated growth, economic
conditions, our competitors’ responses to our marketing strategy or new
competitive conditions, and competition in the geographic and business
areas in which we conduct our operations. Forward-looking statements
contained herein are made only as of the date made, and we do not
undertake any obligation to update them to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this report to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, we
caution that there are important factors, in addition to those listed
above, that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
contained in the forward-looking statements. These factors are included
in our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
First State’s news releases and filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission are available through the Investor Relations section of First
State’s website at www.fcbnm.com.
