First State Bancorporation (NASDAQ:FSNM):
OVERVIEW:
-
First Community Bank returned to well-capitalized under regulatory
guidelines.
-
Completed the sale of our Colorado branches resulting in a gain of
$23 million.
-
Loans decreased $73 million, excluding loans sold in the Colorado
branch sale.
-
Non brokered deposits increased $136 million, excluding the
deposits sold in the Colorado branch sale.
-
Brokered deposits including CDARS reciprocal decreased $156 million.
-
Net interest margin of 2.96% for the quarter.
-
Total non-performing assets increased $60 million.
-
$79 million of allowance not included in regulatory capital.
First State Bancorporation ("First State”) (NASDAQ:FSNM) today announced
a second quarter 2009 net loss of $6.2 million or $(0.30) per diluted
share, compared to a net loss of $118.3 million or $(5.87) per diluted
share for the same period in 2008. First State’s net loss for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was $30.6 million, or $(1.49) per diluted
share, compared to a net loss of $114.4 million, or $(5.68) per diluted
share for the same period in 2008. The net loss for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 resulted primarily from the increase in
provision for loan losses due to increased non-performing assets and
increased charge-offs partially offset by the gain on the sale of our
Colorado branches of $23.3 million in June 2009. The net loss for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was the result of a $127.4
million non-cash goodwill impairment charge and an increased provision
for loan losses due primarily to increased levels of non-performing
assets.
On June 26, 2009, we completed the sale of our Colorado branches to
Great Western Bank, a South Dakota-based subsidiary of National
Australia Bank. On June 26, 2009, we transferred approximately $385
million in loans, $509 million in deposits and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, $20 million of premises and equipment and
other assets, and received a deposit premium of $30 million. After the
write-off of the core deposit intangible associated with these deposits
and certain transaction costs, we recorded a pretax gain of
approximately $23.3 million.
On July 2, 2009, First State Bancorporation (the "Company”) and its
subsidiary bank, First Community Bank ("Bank”), executed a written
agreement ("Agreement”) with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and
the New Mexico Financial Institutions Division (collectively, the
"Regulators”). The Agreement is based on findings of the Regulators
identified in January and February 2009 examinations of the Bank and the
Company, respectively. Several of the provisions in the Agreement are
similar to an informal agreement entered into by the Company and the
Bank in September 2008, as disclosed in the Form 8-K filed September 29,
2008.
"We were very pleased with the continued growth in our core deposits
during the second quarter, and our return to a well-capitalized status
for First Community Bank,” stated Michael R. Stanford, President and
Chief Executive Officer. "We have been working diligently since mid-2008
to ensure that we meet all of the requirements of our agreements with
our Regulators, and are very satisfied with our progress to date,”
continued Stanford.
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands, except share and per-share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
39,998
|
|
$
|
49,541
|
|
$
|
81,228
|
|
$
|
102,510
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
15,080
|
|
|
18,295
|
|
|
29,958
|
|
|
39,859
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
24,918
|
|
|
31,246
|
|
|
51,270
|
|
|
62,651
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(31,100)
|
|
|
(28,700)
|
|
|
(64,400)
|
|
|
(32,600)
|
|
Net interest income (expenses) after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(6,182)
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
(13,130)
|
|
|
30,051
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
30,068
|
|
|
6,987
|
|
|
39,702
|
|
|
13,199
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
30,112
|
|
|
155,134
|
|
|
57,171
|
|
|
182,895
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(6,226)
|
|
|
(145,601)
|
|
|
(30,599)
|
|
|
(139,645)
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(27,294)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(25,263)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(6,226)
|
|
$
|
(118,307)
|
|
$
|
(30,599)
|
|
$
|
(114,382)
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.30)
|
|
$
|
(5.87)
|
|
$
|
(1.49)
|
|
$
|
(5.68)
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.30)
|
|
$
|
(5.87)
|
|
$
|
(1.49)
|
|
$
|
(5.68)
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,608,912
|
|
|
20,165,335
|
|
|
20,539,050
|
|
|
20,150,378
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,608,912
|
|
|
20,165,335
|
|
|
20,539,050
|
|
|
20,150,378
|
First State has disclosed in this release certain non-GAAP financial
measures to provide meaningful supplemental information regarding First
State’s operational performance and to enhance investors’ overall
understanding of First State’s operating financial performance.
Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures allow for
additional transparency and are used by some investors, analysts, and
other users of First State’s financial information as performance
measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are presented for
supplemental informational purposes only for understanding First State’s
operating results and should not be considered a substitute for
financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP
financial measures presented by First State may be different from
non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.
Net loss excluding the gain on sale of our Colorado branches for the
second quarter was a loss of $29.5 million, or $(1.43) per diluted
share. This compares to a net loss, excluding a goodwill impairment
charge, net of tax, of $10.8 million or $(0.54) per diluted share for
the second quarter of 2008. The net loss excluding the gain on sale of
Colorado branches for the six months ended June 30, 2009, was $53.9
million compared to a net loss excluding goodwill impairment charge of
$6.9 million for 2008. Net operating loss per diluted share excluding
the gain on sale of Colorado branches for the six months ended June 30,
2009 was $(2.62) compared to a net loss per diluted share excluding
goodwill impairment charge of $(0.34) for the same period in 2008.
The following table presents performance ratios in accordance with GAAP
and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measurements to the GAAP
financial measurements.
|
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands except per-share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as reported
|
|
$
|
(6,226)
|
|
$
|
(118,307)
|
|
$
|
(30,599)
|
|
$
|
(114,382)
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge, net of tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
107,484
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
107,484
|
|
Gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
|
(23,292)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(23,292)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net income (loss) excluding goodwill impairment charge and gain on
sale of Colorado branches
|
|
$
|
(29,518)
|
|
$
|
(10,823)
|
|
$
|
(53,891)
|
|
$
|
(6,898)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.30)
|
|
$
|
(5.87)
|
|
$
|
(1.49)
|
|
$
|
(5.68)
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share excluding goodwill impairment
charge and gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
$
|
(1.43)
|
|
$
|
(0.54)
|
|
$
|
(2.62)
|
|
$
|
(0.34)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP return on average assets
|
|
|
(0.71)%
|
|
|
(13.58)%
|
|
|
(1.77)%
|
|
|
(6.65)%
|
|
Return on average assets excluding goodwill impairment charge and
gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
|
(3.35)%
|
|
|
(1.24)%
|
|
|
(3.12)%
|
|
|
(0.40)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP return on average equity
|
|
|
(18.59)%
|
|
|
(149.19)%
|
|
|
(42.71)%
|
|
|
(72.38)%
|
|
Return on average equity excluding goodwill impairment charge and
gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
|
(88.13)%
|
|
|
(13.65)%
|
|
|
(75.22)%
|
|
|
(4.36)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income as reported
|
|
$
|
30,068
|
|
$
|
6,987
|
|
$
|
39,702
|
|
$
|
13,199
|
|
Gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
|
(23,292)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(23,292)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-interest income excluding gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
$
|
6,776
|
|
$
|
6,987
|
|
$
|
16,410
|
|
$
|
13,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense as reported
|
|
$
|
30,112
|
|
$
|
155,134
|
|
$
|
57,171
|
|
$
|
182,895
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(127,365)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(127,365)
|
|
Non-interest expense excluding goodwill impairment charge
|
|
$
|
30,112
|
|
$
|
27,769
|
|
$
|
57,171
|
|
$
|
55,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
54.76%
|
|
|
405.76%
|
|
|
62.84%
|
|
|
241.13%
|
|
Efficiency ratio excluding goodwill impairment charge and gain on
sale of Colorado branches
|
|
|
95.01%
|
|
|
72.63%
|
|
|
84.47%
|
|
|
73.21%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP operating expenses to average assets
|
|
|
3.42%
|
|
|
17.81%
|
|
|
3.31%
|
|
|
10.64%
|
|
Operating expenses to average assets excluding goodwill impairment
charge and gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
|
3.42%
|
|
|
3.19%
|
|
|
3.31%
|
|
|
3.23%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
2.96%
|
|
|
3.96%
|
|
|
3.11%
|
|
|
4.04%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
3.80%
|
|
|
9.10%
|
|
|
4.15%
|
|
|
9.19%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
4.66%
|
|
|
7.11%
|
|
|
4.66%
|
|
|
7.11%
|
|
Bank Subsidiary
|
|
|
6.29%
|
|
|
7.88%
|
|
|
6.29%
|
|
|
7.88%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk based capital ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
10.58%
|
|
|
10.44%
|
|
|
10.58%
|
|
|
10.44%
|
|
Bank Subsidiary
|
|
|
10.77%
|
|
|
10.32%
|
|
|
10.77%
|
|
|
10.32%
|
|
BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS:
|
|
(Unaudited – $ in thousands Except per share
amounts)
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
$ Change from December 31, 2008
|
|
$ Change from June 30, 2008
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,992,356
|
|
$
|
3,415,049
|
|
$
|
3,464,882
|
|
$
|
(422,693)
|
|
$
|
(472,526)
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,245,905
|
|
|
2,754,589
|
|
|
2,729,677
|
|
|
(508,684)
|
|
|
(483,772)
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
484,762
|
|
|
488,996
|
|
|
502,366
|
|
|
(4,234)
|
|
|
(17,604)
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
2,197,894
|
|
|
2,522,542
|
|
|
2,646,903
|
|
|
(324,648)
|
|
|
(449,009)
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
399,626
|
|
|
453,319
|
|
|
522,015
|
|
|
(53,693)
|
|
|
(122,389)
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,798,268
|
|
|
2,069,223
|
|
|
2,124,888
|
|
|
(270,955)
|
|
|
(326,620)
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
596,732
|
|
|
596,060
|
|
|
458,253
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
138,479
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
129,202
|
|
|
159,254
|
|
|
191,763
|
|
|
(30,052)
|
|
|
(62,561)
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
6.27
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
$
|
9.52
|
|
$
|
(1.57)
|
|
$
|
(3.25)
|
|
Tangible book value per share
|
|
$
|
5.98
|
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
$
|
8.68
|
|
$
|
(1.10)
|
|
$
|
(2.70)
|
Net interest income was $24.9 million for the second quarter of 2009
compared to $31.2 million for the same quarter of 2008. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, net interest income was $51.3
million and $62.7 million, respectively. Our net interest margin was
2.96% and 3.96% for the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively,
and 3.27% for the first quarter of 2009. The net interest margin was
3.11% and 4.04% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Net Interest Margin
The decrease in the net interest margin is primarily due to the decrease
in the federal funds target rate that began in September 2007 and
continued through December 2008, along with the increase in
non-performing assets throughout 2008 and the first half of 2009. The
Federal Reserve Bank has lowered the federal funds target rate by 500
basis points, 400 of which occurred in calendar 2008, leading to an
equal decrease in the prime lending rate. A significant portion of our
loan portfolio is tied directly to the prime lending rate and adjusts
daily when there is a change in the prime lending rate. The rates paid
on customer deposits are influenced more by competition in our markets
and tend to lag behind Federal Reserve Bank action in both timing and
magnitude, particularly in this very low rate environment.
Our asset sensitivity including the increase in excess cash during the
second quarter of 2009, the decrease in the prime lending rate over the
last eighteen months, the increase in non-accrual loans combined with an
increase in borrowings and slow and minimal deposit repricing continues
to have a negative impact on the net interest margin. The average level
of excess cash including interest-bearing deposits with other banks and
federal funds sold increased by $219 million and $131 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, while
non-accrual loans increased from $74 million at the end of June 30, 2008
to $185 million at the end of June 30, 2009 which negatively impacted
the net interest margin. Average borrowings increased $82 million and
$109 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, generating additional interest expense during the period.
From a deposit perspective, we have lowered selected deposit rates since
the beginning of 2008, but continue to remain competitive in the markets
we serve. During the second quarter of 2009 we were required to monitor
and maintain our deposit rates no higher than 75 bps above the average
local area rates consistent with regulatory requirements for "adequately
capitalized” institutions. This contributed to a decrease in our cost of
deposits during the second quarter of 2009; however, the excess cash
liquidity and increase in non accrual loans negated much of the benefit
of the decrease in deposit rates on the overall net interest margin.
In the first quarter of 2009, in order to increase our liquidity
position, we issued additional brokered deposits and borrowed additional
funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB”), resulting in an increase
in lower yielding cash on the balance sheet. We also focused on longer
maturities of brokered deposits issued in the first quarter of 2009, as
well as longer maturities of FHLB borrowings over the next two to three
years to further strengthen our liquidity position. Although these
activities as noted above have contributed to the recent margin
compression, we continue to believe that the improvement in our current
liquidity position clearly outweighs the potential margin compression
that could continue over the next few quarters. The extent of future
changes in our net interest margin will depend on the amount and timing
of any Federal Reserve rate changes, our overall liquidity position, our
non-performing asset levels, our ability to manage the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities, and our ability to stay competitive in the
markets we serve.
Liquidity
During the second quarter of 2009 we continued to focus our attention on
the overall liquidity position of the Bank due to the current economic
environment in addition to our classification as an "adequately
capitalized” institution. We continued to accumulate and maintain excess
cash liquidity from loan reductions and increased deposits to compensate
for the inability to rollover or issue new brokered deposits including
our CDARS Reciprocal deposits while considered an "adequately
capitalized” institution. During the quarter, excluding the Colorado
branch sale, our efforts contributed to a reduction in the total loan
portfolio of $73 million and helped grow deposits $136 million excluding
brokered deposits. As a result of our inability to rollover or issue new
brokered deposits, we decreased our reliance on brokered deposits by
$156 million during the quarter. Approximately $98 million of the
decrease was made up of CDARS Reciprocal deposits consisting of our
customers who we were not able to renew due to the classification of
these deposits as brokered deposits under the regulatory definition.
During the second quarter, management was also able to establish two
additional federal funds borrowing lines for a total capacity of
approximately $60 million at June 30, 2009 fully collateralized by
investment securities. We continue to work with the FHLB in an effort to
secure a subordination agreement which we anticipate could provide
additional liquidity in the form of additional borrowing capacity of
approximately $100 million with the Federal Discount Window if obtained.
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
Balance beginning of period
|
|
$
|
79,707
|
|
$
|
31,712
|
|
$
|
31,712
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
64,400
|
|
|
71,618
|
|
|
32,600
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(27,185)
|
|
|
(23,623)
|
|
|
(5,328)
|
|
Allowance related to loans sold
|
|
|
(7,827)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance end of period
|
|
$
|
109,095
|
|
$
|
79,707
|
|
$
|
58,984
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for investment
|
|
|
4.89%
|
|
|
2.91%
|
|
|
2.17%
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
52%
|
|
|
67%
|
|
|
80%
|
|
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
Accruing loans – 90 days past due
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
4,139
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Non-accrual loans
|
|
211,303
|
|
|
114,138
|
|
|
73,929
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
$
|
211,303
|
|
$
|
118,277
|
|
$
|
73,930
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
29,671
|
|
|
18,894
|
|
|
15,610
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
$
|
240,974
|
|
$
|
137,171
|
|
$
|
89,540
|
|
Potential problem loans
|
$
|
258,922
|
|
$
|
130,884
|
|
$
|
74,791
|
|
Total non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
8.05%
|
|
|
4.02%
|
|
|
2.58%
|
First State’s provision for loan losses was $31.1 million for the second
quarter of 2009 compared to $28.7 million for the same quarter of 2008.
The provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was
$64.4 million, compared to $32.6 million for the same period in 2008.
First State’s allowance for loan losses was 4.89% and 2.17% of total
loans held for investment at June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008,
respectively. The increase is a result of an increase in net charge-offs
and an increase in non-performing loans. The allowance was increased,
based on management’s current evaluation, to provide for probable
inherent losses in the portfolio, trends in delinquencies, charge-off
experience, and local and national economic conditions. Substantially
all non-performing loans are secured by real estate, where fair value is
more determinable based on appraisals, which decreases the reserves
needed on those loans compared to other categories where the collateral
is less tangible.
Other real estate owned increased approximately $14.1 million compared
to the same period of 2008 and increased approximately $10.8 million
compared to December 31, 2008. Other real estate owned at June 30, 2009
includes $23.7 million in foreclosed or repossessed assets, a $3.9
million property that was previously held for future expansion and
development by Front Range Capital Corporation, a company acquired by
First State in March 2007, and $2.1 million in facilities and vacant
land listed for sale.
"Our non-performing asset totals continue to be impacted primarily by
deterioration in our residential construction and land development loan
portfolios,” stated H. Patrick Dee, Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer. "We have aggressively reassessed our potential
exposure to construction and land development loans and have established
specific reserves based on current market values, even for some loans
which are not yet past due but that we have moved to a non-performing
status. We have continued to bolster our allowance for loan losses,
which has resulted in $79 million in the allowance that is not included
in our capital ratios,” continued Dee.
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Service charges
|
|
$
|
3,690
|
|
$
|
3,722
|
|
$
|
(32)
|
|
(1)%
|
|
Credit and debit card transaction fees
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
5
|
|
1
|
|
Gain (loss) on investment securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
(110)
|
|
(100)
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
151
|
|
14
|
|
Gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
|
23,292
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
23,292
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
(225)
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,068
|
|
$
|
6,987
|
|
$
|
23,081
|
|
330%
|
The increase in gain on sale of mortgage loans is primarily due to
increased volumes. During the second quarter of 2009 we sold $106
million in loans compared to $76 million during the same period in 2008,
realizing a smaller gain per loan sold.
The gain on sale of our Colorado branches is from the completion of our
sale transaction to Great Western Bank on June 26, 2009.
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Service charges
|
|
$
|
7,453
|
|
$
|
6,714
|
|
$
|
739
|
|
11%
|
|
Credit and debit card transaction fees
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
20
|
|
1
|
|
Gain (loss) on investment securities
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
(126)
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
(2,286)
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|
269
|
|
11
|
|
Gain on sale of Colorado branches
|
|
|
23,292
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
23,292
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
2,279
|
|
|
(697)
|
|
(31)
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,702
|
|
$
|
13,199
|
|
$
|
26,503
|
|
201%
|
The increase in service charges on deposit accounts is due to an
increase in NSF fees charged per occurrence, an increase in account
analysis fees, an increase in non-customer ATM fees, and a reduction in
fees waived from deposit accounts.
The increase in gain on investment securities is due to an increase in
sales of investment securities during the period. During the first
quarter of 2009, certain securities were sold at a gain as part of our
continued efforts to bolster capital. The loss on investment securities
in 2008 includes an "other than temporary” impairment charge of $333,000
on FHLMC preferred stock, held in the available for sale portfolio and
acquired as part of the acquisition of Front Range Capital Corporation
in March 2007, partially offset by gains from calls and sales of
securities during the period.
The increase in gain on sale of mortgage loans is primarily due to
increased volumes. During the first half of 2009 we sold $209 million in
loans compared to $160 million during the same period in 2008, realizing
a smaller gain per loan sold.
The gain on sale of our Colorado branches is from the completion of our
sale transaction to Great Western Bank on June 26, 2009.
The decrease in other non-interest income is due primarily to a decrease
in check imprint income, and a decrease in earnings on cash deposited
with our official check outsourcing vendor.
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
12,437
|
|
$
|
12,763
|
|
$
|
(326)
|
|
(3) %
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
3,623
|
|
|
4,138
|
|
|
(515)
|
|
(12)
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
58
|
|
4
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
1,913
|
|
|
(417)
|
|
(22)
|
|
Legal, accounting, and consulting
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
799
|
|
101
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
(56)
|
|
(8)
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
(150)
|
|
(26)
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
(385)
|
|
(32)
|
|
FDIC insurance premiums
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
614
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
(39)
|
|
(6)
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
127,365
|
|
|
(127,365)
|
|
(100)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
3,111
|
|
|
122
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,112
|
|
$
|
155,134
|
|
$
|
(125,022)
|
|
(81)%
|
The decrease in salaries and employee benefits is primarily due to a
decrease in headcount. At June 30, 2009, full time equivalent employees
totaled 587 compared to 905 at June 30, 2008. The decrease is also due
to a decrease in incentive bonus expense, a decrease in self-insured
medical and dental claims, partially offset by increased mortgage
commissions and separation pay associated with the sale of the Colorado
branches and the closure of our Colorado Mortgage division. The
separation pay related to the Colorado branches and the Colorado
Mortgage division totaled $1.3 million.
The decrease in occupancy is primarily due to a decrease in building
depreciation expense and leasehold amortization due to the
classification of the Colorado branches to held for sale prior to the
completion of the sale, and lower lease impairment charges in the second
quarter of 2009 compared to 2008.
The decrease in equipment is primarily due to the decrease in
depreciation expense on equipment related to the Colorado branches
classified as held for sale prior to the completion of the sale.
The increase in legal, accounting, and consulting resulted from legal
and investment banking fees of approximately $350,000 incurred in
connection with the sale of our Colorado branches, and consulting costs
of approximately $170,000 related to a staffing model that was prepared
in connection with our continued efforts to control non-interest
expenses. In addition, legal fees in 2009 have been higher as a result
of higher levels of non-performing loans.
The decrease in expenses for other real estate owned is primarily due to
a decrease in write-downs of properties to reflect their fair values,
partially offset by an increase in other expenses related to the
properties.
The increase in FDIC insurance premiums is due in part to new FDIC
assessment rates that took effect on January 1, 2009, as well as an
increase in average deposits. Also, in February 2009, the FDIC adopted
an additional final rule which included an additional uniform two basis
point increase as well as other adjustments that took effect on April 1,
2009. In addition, in May 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule
establishing a special assessment of five basis points on each
FDIC-insured depository institution's assets, minus its Tier 1 capital,
as of June 30, 2009. The special assessment which totaled $1.4 million
will be collected September 30, 2009.
The goodwill impairment charge represents the write-off of goodwill in
the second quarter of 2008.
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
23,959
|
|
$
|
26,280
|
|
$
|
(2,321)
|
|
(9)%
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
7,441
|
|
|
8,163
|
|
|
(722)
|
|
(9)
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
|
2,926
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
(1)
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
4,057
|
|
|
(646)
|
|
(16)
|
|
Legal, accounting, and consulting
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
115
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
(144)
|
|
(10)
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
(272)
|
|
(26)
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
73
|
|
4
|
|
FDIC insurance premiums
|
|
|
5,268
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
4,273
|
|
429
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
(77)
|
|
(6)
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
127,365
|
|
|
(127,365)
|
|
(100)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,128
|
|
|
6,214
|
|
|
(86)
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,171
|
|
$
|
182,895
|
|
$
|
(125,724)
|
|
69%
|
The decrease in salaries and employee benefits is primarily due to a
decrease in headcount. At June 30, 2009, full time equivalent employees
totaled 587 compared to 905 at June 30, 2008. The decrease is also due
to a decrease in incentive bonus expense, a decrease in self-insured
medical and dental claims, partially offset by increased mortgage
commissions and separation-pay associated with the sale of the Colorado
branches and the closure of our Colorado Mortgage division.
The decrease in occupancy is primarily due to a decrease in building
depreciation expense and leasehold amortization due to classification of
the Colorado branches to held for sale prior to the completion of the
sale, and lower lease impairment charges in the second quarter of 2009
compared to 2008.
The decrease in equipment is primarily the decrease in depreciation
expense on equipment related to the Colorado branches classified as held
for sale prior to the completion of the sale.
The increase in legal, accounting, and consulting resulted from legal
and investment banking fees incurred in connection with the sale of our
Colorado branches, and consulting costs related to a staffing model that
was prepared in connection with our continued efforts to control
non-interest expenses.
The increase in expenses for other real estate owned is primarily due to
an increase in the number of properties partially offset by a decrease
in Oreo write-downs.
The increase in FDIC insurance premiums is due to new FDIC assessment
rates that took effect on January 1, 2009, the five basis point special
assessment, as well as an increase in deposits. The final rule also
permits the imposition of an additional emergency special assessment
after June 30, 2009, of up to five basis points per quarter through 2009.
The decrease in other non-interest expense includes decreases in supply
expense, delivery expense, check imprint expense, and travel and
entertainment expense which are part of our bank-wide expense reduction
strategy, partially offset by increases in our D & O insurance.
There was no income tax benefit for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, as the net operating loss and other net deferred tax assets
were fully offset by a deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
In conjunction with its second quarter earnings release, First State
will host a conference call to discuss these results, which will be
simulcast over the Internet on Thursday, July 23, 2009 at 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time. To listen to the call and view the slide presentation,
visit www.fcbnm.com,
Investor Relations. The conference call will be available for replay
beginning July 23, 2009 through August 2, 2009 at www.fcbnm.com,
Investor Relations.
First State Bancorporation is a New Mexico based commercial bank holding
company (NASDAQ:FSNM). First State provides services, through its
subsidiary First Community Bank, to customers from a total of 40
branches located in New Mexico and Arizona. On Wednesday, July 22, 2009,
First State’s stock closed at $1.36 per share.
The following tables provide selected information for average balances
and average yields for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2009 and June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
2,656,375
|
|
5.24%
|
|
$
|
2,659,033
|
|
6.61%
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
499,444
|
|
4.14%
|
|
|
505,089
|
|
4.63%
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds sold
|
|
|
225,515
|
|
0.25%
|
|
|
6,549
|
|
2.40%
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
3,381,334
|
|
4.74%
|
|
|
3,170,671
|
|
6.28%
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,208,533
|
|
2.09%
|
|
|
2,106,917
|
|
2.82%
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
2,866,307
|
|
2.11%
|
|
|
2,682,935
|
|
2.74%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest-bearing demand accounts
|
|
|
505,412
|
|
|
|
|
481,463
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
134,345
|
|
|
|
|
318,947
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,531,448
|
|
|
|
|
3,503,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
(Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
2,697,172
|
|
5.28%
|
|
$
|
2,608,810
|
|
7.01%
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
488,686
|
|
4.31%
|
|
|
502,887
|
|
4.61%
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds sold
|
|
|
138,441
|
|
0.26%
|
|
|
7,385
|
|
3.10%
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
3,324,299
|
|
4.93%
|
|
|
3,119,082
|
|
6.61%
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,168,340
|
|
2.18%
|
|
|
2,098,113
|
|
3.05%
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
2,827,102
|
|
2.14%
|
|
|
2,647,755
|
|
3.03%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest-bearing demand accounts
|
|
|
483,332
|
|
|
|
|
470,055
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
144,473
|
|
|
|
|
317,799
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,479,339
|
|
|
|
|
3,457,926
|
|
|
The following tables provide information regarding loans and deposits
for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the year ended
December 31, 2008:
|
LOANS: (Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ 279,507
|
|
12.4%
|
|
|
$ 356,769
|
|
13.0%
|
|
|
$ 352,039
|
|
12.9%
|
|
Real estate – commercial
|
|
898,435
|
|
40.0%
|
|
|
1,172,952
|
|
42.6%
|
|
|
1,060,150
|
|
38.8%
|
|
Real estate – one- to four-family
|
|
186,184
|
|
8.3%
|
|
|
270,613
|
|
9.8%
|
|
|
272,509
|
|
10.0%
|
|
Real estate – construction
|
|
835,561
|
|
37.2%
|
|
|
896,117
|
|
32.5%
|
|
|
987,306
|
|
36.2%
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
31,570
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
41,474
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
45,062
|
|
1.6%
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
14,648
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
16,664
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
12,611
|
|
0.5%
|
|
Total
|
|
$2,245,905
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$2,754,589
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$2,729,677
|
|
100.0%
|
|
DEPOSITS: (Unaudited - $ in thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
Non-interest bearing
|
|
$ 399,626
|
|
18.2%
|
|
|
$ 453,319
|
|
18.0%
|
|
|
$ 522,015
|
|
19.7%
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
297,871
|
|
13.6%
|
|
|
296,732
|
|
11.8%
|
|
|
327,370
|
|
12.4%
|
|
Money market savings accounts
|
|
452,811
|
|
20.6%
|
|
|
471,011
|
|
18.6%
|
|
|
614,666
|
|
23.2%
|
|
Regular savings
|
|
91,865
|
|
4.2%
|
|
|
100,691
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|
110,139
|
|
4.2%
|
|
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
|
|
245,252
|
|
11.2%
|
|
|
325,110
|
|
12.9%
|
|
|
358,362
|
|
13.5%
|
|
Certificates of deposit greater than $100,000
|
|
418,543
|
|
19.0%
|
|
|
471,826
|
|
18.7%
|
|
|
631,408
|
|
23.8%
|
|
CDARS Reciprocal deposits
|
|
113,031
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
212,249
|
|
8.4%
|
|
|
62,943
|
|
2.4%
|
|
Brokered deposits
|
|
178,895
|
|
8.1%
|
|
|
191,604
|
|
7.6%
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
0.8%
|
|
Total
|
|
$2,197,894
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$2,522,542
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$2,646,903
|
|
100.0%
|
Certain statements in this news release are forward-looking statements,
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act”).
These statements are based on management’s current expectations or
predictions of future results or events. We make these forward-looking
statements in reliance on the safe harbor provisions provided under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in
this news release which relate to performance, development or activities
that we expect or anticipate will or may happen in the future, are
forward-looking statements. The discussions regarding our growth
strategy, expansion of operations in our markets, acquisitions,
dispositions, competition, loan and deposit growth, timing of new branch
openings, capital expectations, and response to consolidation in the
banking industry include forward-looking statements. Other
forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of
forward-looking words such as "believe,” "expect,” "may,” "might,”
"will,” "should,” "seek,” "could,” "approximately,” "intend,” "plan,”
"estimate,” or "anticipate” or the negative of those words or other
similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and
are based on numerous assumptions. They are not guarantees of future
performance. A number of important factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in the forward-looking statement. Some
factors include changes in interest rates, local business conditions,
government regulations, loss of key personnel or inability to hire
suitable personnel, faster or slower than anticipated growth, economic
conditions, our competitors’ responses to our marketing strategy or new
competitive conditions, and competition in the geographic and business
areas in which we conduct our operations. Forward-looking statements
contained herein are made only as of the date made, and we do not
undertake any obligation to update them to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this report to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, we
caution that there are important factors, in addition to those listed
above, that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
contained in the forward-looking statements. These factors are included
in our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
First State’s news releases and filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission are available through the Investor Relations section of First
State’s website at www.fcbnm.com.