EDF Energy plc -- Moody's changes outlook on EDF's Aa3 rating to negative from stable
The change of outlook to negative from stable follows the recent ruling by France's Conseil d'Etat which cancelled the decision relating to the electricity distribution tariffs for the third regulatory period (2009-2013, known as TURPE 3). Although EDF considers that the decision should not have an impact on its financial results, in Moody's view it adds to the challenges faced by the group from rising debt and pressured profitability. It therefore increases the risk that the group will be unable to maintain a leverage profile that is aligned with Moody's guidance for the Aa3 rating.
The Conseil d'Etat's decision was based on its judgment that the methodology used by the CRE, the French electricity regulator, for calculating the capital return on the electricity distribution network of ERDF, EDF's subsidiary, is incorrect since it did not take account of the nature of the concessions assets and renewal provisions. The distribution network charges for TURPE 3 have therefore been incorrectly calculated. There remains uncertainty surrounding the amount and timing of any remedies that might be required, and their potential impact on EDF. The group itself considers that the decision should not have an impact on its financial results because of the nature of its integrated tariffs.
However, in Moody's view, there remains some risk of a negative financial impact on the group whether from any potential remedy, or from the revised methodology which the CRE is required to propose by June 2013.
The negative outlook takes account of the increase in EDF's net financial debt to EUR39.7 billion at end-June 2012 as a result of its acquisition of Edison; higher capital expenditure; and the rising Contribution au Service Public de l'Electricite (CSPE) balance. It also reflects a flat outlook for the group's profitability in 2013, under pressure from rising nuclear safety costs and weaker power generation earnings in certain markets outside France.
In changing the outlook on EDF's ratings, Moody's takes account of the group's efforts to ease the burden on its balance sheet, and to underpin profitability in order to achieve its 2.5x net debt/EBITDA leverage target. The outlook change factors in the group's ongoing discussions with the government regarding CSPE. Moreover, Moody's notes EDF's ongoing review of its operating costs and capital expenditure (capex) trajectory, which currently includes rising investment in renewables, new nuclear plant builds and its gas strategy.
Nevertheless, Moody's expects the negative pressure on EDF's free cash flow generation to continue, partly as a result of the group's substantial capital investment commitments. These include the Flamanville EPR, the cost estimate for which was recently increased by a further EUR2 billion to EUR8 billion, with planned commissioning maintained for 2016.
The negative outlook therefore reflects the risk, in Moody's view, that measures taken by the group to manage its leverage could be insufficient to ensure its credit metrics remain well positioned against the following guidelines: (1) RCF/net debt in the mid- to upper teens in percentage terms; and (2) FFO/net debt in the high teens/low 20s range in percentage terms.
In light of EDF's 84.48% ownership by the Government of France (Aa1 negative), the group falls under Moody's rating methodology for government-related issuers (GRIs) and its Aa3 rating incorporates a two-notch uplift from its standalone credit quality for potential government support.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP/DOWN
Given the current uncertainties and risks with regard to EDF's cash flows, as reflected by the negative outlook, Moody's does not consider an upgrade of the group's ratings to be likely in the near term.
Negative pressure could be exerted on EDF's a2 Baseline Credit Assessment (BCA) in the event of a sustained deterioration in the group's financial profile, as would be evidenced, for example, by a retained cash flow (RCF)/net debt ratio in the low teens in percentage terms on a sustainable basis. Such a deterioration could result from lower-than-expected profitability, capital investment unsupported by cash flow generation or large debt-funded acquisitions. In the context both of increased demands on national budgets and a two-notch rating uplift under Moody's GRI methodology, it is likely that negative pressure would be exerted on EDF's Aa3 rating were the BCA to deteriorate to a3 from a2.
The methodologies used in this rating were Unregulated Utilities and Power Companies published in August 2009, and Government-Related Issuers: Methodology Update published in July 2010. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.
Electricité de France, headquartered in Paris, France, is a leading integrated provider of electricity generation, transmission, distribution and supply services. It reported turnover of EUR36.2 billion during the first six months of 2012 and EBITDA of EUR9.1 billion.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entities or their designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.
Information sources used to prepare each of the ratings are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entities, obligations or credits satisfactory for the purposes of issuing these ratings.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning the ratings is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entities or their related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
In addition to the information provided below please find on the ratings tab of the issuer page at www.moodys.com, for each of the ratings covered, Moody's disclosures on the lead rating analyst and the Moody's legal entity that has issued each of the ratings.
Niel Bisset Senior Vice President Infrastructure Finance Moody's Investors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Monica Merli MD - Infrastructure Finance Infrastructure Finance JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Private Krankenversicherung Tarifvergleich
Heute im Fokus
EZB - Banken erhalten Prüfergebnisse ab Donnerstag. Presseverlage erteilen Google überraschend Recht zur Gratisnutzung. Dreamliner-Kosten vermiesen Boeing-Aktionären die Stimmung. Aareal-Bank könnte Jahresprognose erneut anheben. FMC kauft US-Spezialisten für Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen. In der EU bahnt sich neuer Haushaltsstreit an. Gabriel wehrt sich in USA gegen Ruf nach Konjunkturpaket.
Die zehn teuersten Aktien der Welt
Diese Aktien sind auf den Verkauflisten der Experten
Wo tankt man am teuersten?