25.10.2012 09:05
Bewerten
 (0)

Faurecia SA -- Moody's changes outlook of Faurecia's Ba3 CFR to negative from stable

Frankfurt am Main, October 25, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has today affirmed the Ba3 Corporate Family Rating ("CFR") of Faurecia S.A. as well as the Ba3 rating on Faurecia'sEUR 490 million senior guaranteed notes due 2016, the B2 rating on its EUR 250 million senior notes due 2019 and the B2 rating on its EUR 250 million convertible notes due 2018. The outlook on the ratings has been changed to negative from stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

"The outlook change to negative has been triggered by the reduced earnings guidance for the full year 2012 communicated by Faurecia this week." says Rainer Neidnig, a Moody's Vice President and lead analyst for Faurecia. "We now expect that Faurecia will not achieve break-even free cash flow in the second half of this year and that full year credit metrics will likely be weak for the rating category. The negative outlook reflects the possible challenges to maintain profitability and leverage ratios in line with the Ba3 rating category against the backdrop of an uncertain economic environment, in particular in Europe".

The affirmation of Faurecia's Ba3 corporate family rating reflects Moody's view that the earnings decline is primarily caused be a cyclical decline in European car production volumes and that Faurecia's competitive position remains strong as evidenced by solid revenue growth outside Europe. Although Moody's expects credit metrics for the full year 2012 to be weak for the rating category, we expect them to remain broadly in line with Faurecia's Ba3 corporate family rating through the cycle. Increasing confidence in this respect would very likely result in a stabilization of the rating outlook.

On October 23rd, Faurecia has trimmed its operating profit expectation for 2012 to "above EUR 500 million" as weak demand for new cars results in lower than expected production volumes of light vehicles in Europe. Previously, the company expected an operating profit of EUR 560 million to EUR 610 million.

In the third quarter of 2012, Faurecia reported a revenue decline of 4.2% in Europe on a like-for-like basis which compares to an overall market decline in Europe of 5.9% according to Faurecia. At the same time Faurecia achieved further solid revenue growth outside Europe, most notably in North America, where revenues increased by 19% on a like-for-like basis in the third quarter of 2012. Moody's expects that growth in other regions helps mitigating the earnings decline in Europe during 2012.

Because of lower than expected earnings and ongoing investments in future growth, Moody's believes Faurecia will fail to achieve break-even free cash flow in the second half of 2012 and report significant negative free cash flow for the full year though we recognize that the significant growth capex program is an important driver. At the same time Moody's expects Faurecia to achieve an EBIT-margin of close to 2% on a Moody's adjusted basis in 2012 and yearend debt/EBITDA close to 4.5x.

Moody's currently forecasts demand for new cars and light commercial vehicles in Western Europe to decline moderately by 3.0% in 2013 whereas we expect global demand to grow by 2.9%. Based on these estimates Moody's expects Faurecia should be able to maintain profitability and leverage levels next year and to gradually improve them going forward absent a significant deterioration in market conditions. This view is based on cost adjustments taking hold and an increasing profitability outside Europe as costs caused by the recent rapid expansion should reduce. Moody's also expects Faurecia to return to break-even free cash flow generation by the end of 2013 as the company said it will limit capital expenditures and capitalized development R&D to EUR 800 million per year during 2012-2014. However, Moody's cautions that the future financial performance of Faurecia remains highly dependent on the overall macroeconomic environment and that visibility for new car and light commercial vehicle production volumes in 2013 and beyond is very limited.

The Ba3 CFR remains supported by Faurecia's solid business profile. In particular, Moody's views (i) the large size of Faurecia's operations, (ii) its global presence, (iii) solid market positions (among top three players in relevant markets according to management data) and (iv) established customer relationships with most of the global original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) as credit strengths. However, Faurecia is strongly reliant on cyclical new light vehicle production volumes as it lacks any non-automotive activities and a material aftermarket business. Moreover, the group is strongly exposed to its European home market where it generated 57% of product sales in the first nine months of 2012 and to core customers Volkswagen (A3, positive outlook) and Peugeot (PSA) (Ba3, negative outlook). The rating also reflects the general risks to which virtually all automotive suppliers are exposed, i.e. high level of competition and strong bargaining power of OEM customers.

Faurecia's liquidity might be negatively impacted by the weaker than expected cash flow generation which largely offsets the positive liquidity impact of Faurecia's successful EUR 250 million convertible notes issue in September. As of June 2012, Faurecia had a sizeable cash position of EUR 800 million and available commitments of EUR 730 million under its existing EUR 1,150 million core credit facility (EUR 690 million mature in December 2014 and EUR 460 million mature in December 2016). However, the company also had sizeable short-term debt maturities (EUR 725 million) and off-balance sheet short-term factoring activities (EUR 377 million). Moody's views positively that Faurecia was able to rely on its relationship banks during the 2009 recession and also that according to management data its factoring arrangements worked well also in the middle of the industry downturn. Moody's further notes that Faurecia's core credit facilities contain conditionality language in the form of financial covenants. Covenant headroom as of June 2012 has been adequate but Moody's cautions that it might tighten, if earnings continued to decline.

The negative outlook reflects the substantial negative free cash flow generation in the current year and the challenge to maintain profitability and leverage ratios in line with the Ba3 rating category against the backdrop of an uncertain economic environment, in particular in Europe. The outlook would likely be changed back to stable upon increasing visibility that Faurecia can return to positive free cash flow generation and achieve an EBIT-margin of at least 2% as well as leverage at levels of 4x debt/EBITDA or lower through the cycle.

Moody's would consider to downgrade Faurecia's ratings, should EBIT-margins fall below 2% or in case of recurring negative free cash flow generation. Likewise, a significant increase in leverage such as debt/EBITDA rising materially above 4x for a longer period, a weakening liquidity profile or a tightening of covenant headroom could result in a downgrade.

An upgrade is unlikely at this stage, but would be considered should Faurecia manage to achieve EBIT-margins of 3% or higher, positive free cash flow generation, and a debt/EBITDA ratio below 3.5x through the cycle on a sustainable basis. An improvement of Faurecia's liquidity profile is also a critical consideration for an upgrade.

Moody's views Faurecia's relationship with majority shareholder PSA primarily as a commercial challenge. However, Moody's cautions that this challenge may further increase given the weak operating performance and the weakening credit profile of PSA which creates an additional source of potential risk. Faurecia's ratings continue to reflect Moody's expectation that financing arrangements of Faurecia and PSA remain separated in future. This view also considers Faurecia's responsibilities to its minority shareholders and that Faurecia's existing credit agreements place limits on the payment of dividends and the incurrence of additional debt.

The principal methodology used in rating Faurecia S.A. was the Global Automotive Supplier Industry Methodology published in January 2009. Other methodologies used include Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.

Headquartered in Paris, France, Faurecia group is one of the world's largest automotive suppliers for seats, exhaust systems, exteriors and interiors. In 2011, group revenues amounted to EUR 16.2 billion. The group operates along four divisions: Automotive Seating, Interior Systems, Emission Control Technologies and Automotive Exteriors. The parent company, Faurecia S.A., is a holding company which directly and indirectly provides financial, accounting, general management and administrative services to the group. Faurecia S.A. is listed on the Paris stock exchange. The largest shareholder is PSA Peugeot Citroën which holds 57% of Faurecia's shares and 73% of voting rights. The remaining shares are in free float.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.

Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

The rated entity has received an Indicative Assessment Service within the last two years preceding the credit rating action.

Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Rainer Neidnig Vice President - Senior Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody'sDeutschland GmbH An der Welle 5 Frankfurt am Main 60322 Germany JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Matthias Hellstern Managing Director Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Releasing Office: Moody's Deutschland GmbH An der Welle 5 Frankfurt am Main 60322 Germany JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Artikel empfehlen?

Nachrichten zu Faurecia S.A.

  • Relevant
  • Alle
  • vom Unternehmen
  • Peer Group
  • ?
Um Ihnen die Übersicht über die große Anzahl an Nachrichten, die jeden Tag für ein Unternehmen erscheinen, etwas zu erleichtern, haben wir den Nachrichtenfeed in folgende Kategorien aufgeteilt:

Relevant: Nachrichten von ausgesuchten Quellen, die sich im Speziellen mit diesem Unternehmen befassen
Alle: Alle Nachrichten, die dieses Unternehmen betreffen. Z.B. auch Marktberichte die außerdem auch andere Unternehmen betreffen
vom Unternehmen: Nachrichten und Adhoc-Meldungen, die vom Unternehmen selbst veröffentlicht werden
Peer Group: Nachrichten von Unternehmen, die zur Peer Group gehören

RSS Feed

Analysen zu Faurecia S.A.

  • Alle
  • Buy
  • Hold
  • Sell
  • ?
13.12.2012Faurecia neutralExane-BNP Paribas SA
19.11.2012Faurecia buyDeutsche Bank AG
14.11.2012Faurecia neutralExane-BNP Paribas SA
13.11.2012Faurecia holdSociété Générale Group S.A. (SG)
23.10.2012Faurecia neutralExane-BNP Paribas SA
19.11.2012Faurecia buyDeutsche Bank AG
09.10.2012Faurecia overweightHSBC
25.07.2012Faurecia buySociété Générale Group S.A. (SG)
08.06.2012Faurecia buySociété Générale Group S.A. (SG)
25.05.2012Faurecia buySociété Générale Group S.A. (SG)
13.12.2012Faurecia neutralExane-BNP Paribas SA
14.11.2012Faurecia neutralExane-BNP Paribas SA
13.11.2012Faurecia holdSociété Générale Group S.A. (SG)
23.10.2012Faurecia neutralExane-BNP Paribas SA
27.07.2012Faurecia neutralUBS AG
07.09.2012Faurecia sellUBS AG
19.11.2008Faurecia sellSociété Générale Group S.A. (SG)
24.07.2008Faurecia sellSociété Générale Group S.A. (SG)
13.10.2006Faurecia sellSociété Générale (SG)
03.08.2006Faurecia sellMerrill Lynch
Um die Übersicht zu verbessern, haben Sie die Möglichkeit, die Analysen für Faurecia S.A. nach folgenden Kriterien zu filtern.

Alle: Alle Empfehlungen
Buy: Kaufempfehlungen wie z.B. "kaufen" oder "buy"
Hold: Halten-Empfehlungen wie z.B. "halten" oder "neutral"
Sell: Verkaufsempfehlungn wie z.B. "verkaufen" oder "reduce"

Für den Live-Chat können Sie sich mit Ihrem finanzen.net-, Facebook- oder Twitter Account anmelden. Um immer die neusten Beiträge zu sehen, stellen Sie bitte "Neuesten" ein.

Private Krankenversicherung Tarifvergleich

Heute im Fokus

DAX schließt unter 9.000 Punkten -- 25 Banken sollen Stresstest nicht bestanden haben -- US-Börsen leicht im Plus -- Ford, BASF, Amazon, Microsoft im Fokus

Apple will Beats-Musik-App in iTunes aufgehen lassen. Deutsche Bank leidet unter Rückstellungen. S&P hebt Bonitätsnote von Zypern an. Ryanair-Chef unterschreibt für fünf weitere Jahre. FMC besorgt sich 900 Millionen US-Dollar am Bondmarkt. Chiquita lässt Fyffes-Fusion platzen. Cameron: Werden Milliarden-Rechnung aus Brüssel nicht bezahlen.
Welche Aktien zählt George Soros zu seinem Portfolio?

Diese Aktien sind auf den Kauflisten der Experten

So platzieren sich die Deutschen

Umfrage

Verkehrsminister Dobrindt erwägt scheinbar, die Pkw-Maut vorerst nur auf Autobahnen einzuführen. Was halten Sie von diesem Rückzieher?

Anzeige