DAX8.4690,0%  Dow15.3880,3%  Euro1,29410,3% 
ESt502.816-0,2%  Nas3.5020,2%  Öl103,5-0,3% 
TDax974,00,5%  Nikkei15.6271,6%  Gold1.3911,3% 

20.06.2012 16:55

Senden

Missouri State University -- Moody's assigns A1 to Missouri State University's $34.8 million Series 2012A Auxiliary Revenue Bonds and affirms outstanding ratings; outlook is stable


University has $145 million of rated debt including current offering

New York, June 20, 2012 --

Moody's Rating

Issue: Auxiliary Enterprise System Revenue Bonds, Series 2012; Rating: A1; Sale Amount: $34,800,000; Expected Sale Date: 06/29/2012; Rating Description: Revenue: Public University Limited Pledge

Opinion

Moody's has assigned an A1 rating to Missouri State University's ("MSU") $34.8 million Auxiliary Enterprise System Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A. At this time we have also affirmed the A1 rating on MSU's outstanding Auxiliary Enterprise System Bonds and the Aa3 rating on the outstanding Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds. The rating outlook is stable.

SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE: The Aa3 rating reflects MSU's stable market position as a regional public university, strong balance sheet coverage of debt and operations, healthy and improving operating margin, as well as the broader pledge for the Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds. The rating also incorporates the university's declining state support, slower operating revenue growth (per Moody's calculation). The auxiliary enterprise system bonds are rated A1 reflecting the more limited revenue stream supporting debt service.

STRENGTHS:

*Stable market position as a regional public university primarily serving southwest Missouri (Aaa G.O. state rating). Full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment of 16,298 in fall 2011. Generally flat FTE enrollment over the past five years expected to continue for fall 2012.

*Strong financial resource growth in FY 2011 driven by retained operating surpluses, strong investment returns, and gifts from the ongoing capital campaign. Expendable financial resources were $208.8 million in FY 2011, providing good coverage of pro-forma debt and operations at 1.34 and 0.83 times respectively.

*Consistently healthy operating performance expected to continue, despite pressure on state operating support. The operating cash flow margin grew to 17.7% in FY 2011, providing excellent 4.94 times debt service coverage. Continued favorable operating performance projected for FY 2012, though weaker than FY 2011 due largely to state appropriation cuts.

*Ample monthly liquidity of $142.5 million provides 224 days monthly cash on hand.

CHALLENGES:

*Declining state appropriations have continued in FY 2012. State appropriations declined 5.2% in FY 2011 and a further 7.0% in FY 2012. The governor's last proposal included a 7.78% cut for MSU in FY 2013, but the state legislature approved a flat budget for higher education. The governor will approve or reduce the proposed budget by the end of the month. At this point, the university has budgeted for a 7.78% cut (equal to $6 million) in state operating support.

*Continued need to make strategic and competitive investments within the framework of constrained state funding environment. Future debt plans are being evaluated within the next couple of years for the College of Business Administration (COBA). Plans are preliminary and future debt would be supported by the recently approved $25 per credit hour fee for upper level courses at the COBA.

* More limited security pledge for the Auxiliary System Revenue bonds, and for the Series 2007 bonds, reliance on a single donor's annual contribution to pay nearly half of annual debt service. This donor has consistently made debt service payments on time and has a history of support for the university; however there is currently a pending law suit against the donor's trust.

Outlook

Moody's stable rating outlook is based on our expectation that the university will continue to produce healthy operating performance despite pressure on state operating support and that pledged revenues will continue to provide adequate coverage of debt service responsibilities.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP

Substantial increase in financial resources to provide a stronger cushion for debt and operations; stable enrollment and tuition revenue growth; continued healthy operating margins to offset pressure on state funding

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING DOWN

Significant additional debt without commensurate growth in financial resources; for the Auxiliary Enterprise System Revenue bonds, a decrease in donor support for Series 2007A debt service payments or a decline in the university's support for the auxiliary system; pressure on student enrollment, tuition revenue or auxiliary enterprise revenue that weakens cash flow and debt service coverage; decreased state operating appropriations or pressure on the state's credit profile

The principal methodology used in this rating was U.S. Not-for-Profit Private and Public Higher Education published in August 2011. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody'sInvestors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service's information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Analytics' information.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Emily Schwarz Analyst Public Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653Kimberly S. Tuby Vice President - Senior Analyst Public Finance Group Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody'sOverseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Kommentare zu diesem Artikel

Geben Sie jetzt einen Kommentar zu diesem Artikel ab.
 Kommentar hinzufügen 

ANZEIGE

Private Krankenversicherung Tarifvergleich

ANZEIGE

Wie lange halten Sie Ihre Zertifikate durchschnittlich in Ihrem Depot?
mehrere Jahre
mehrere Monate bis zu einem Jahr
wenige Wochen
ein paar Tage
ich handele intraday
 Abstimmen