Kurse + Charts + RealtimeNews + AnalysenFundamentalUnternehmenzugeh. WertpapiereAktion
Kurs + ChartChart (groß)NewsBilanz/GuVDividende/HVZertifikateDepot/Watchlist
Times + SalesChart-AnalyseAnalysenSchätzungenTermineOptionsscheinemyHome
BörsenplätzeChartvergleichKurszieleVergleichProfilKnock-OutsSenden/Drucken
OrderbuchRealtime StuttgartFundamentalanalyseRatingInsidertradesFondsInvestmentreport
HistorischRealtime PushmyNews im ForumAnleihen
Kaufen
Verkaufen

20.11.2012 21:39

Senden

Moody's Affirms 18 CMBS Classes of CSFB 2004-C5

AT&T zu myNews hinzufügen Was ist das?


Approximately $1.3 Billion of Structured Securities Affected

New York, November 20, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of 18 classes of Credit Suisse First Boston Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-C5 as follows:

Cl. A-3, Affirmed at Aaa (sf); previously on Mar 9, 2011 Confirmed at Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-AB, Affirmed at Aaa (sf); previously on Mar 9, 2011 Confirmed at Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-4, Affirmed at Aaa (sf); previously on Mar 9, 2011 Confirmed at Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-1-A, Affirmed at Aaa (sf); previously on Mar 9, 2011 Confirmed at Aaa (sf)

Cl. A-J, Affirmed at Aa2 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to Aa2 (sf)

Cl. B, Affirmed at A2 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to A2 (sf)

Cl. C, Affirmed at Baa1 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to Baa1 (sf)

Cl. D, Affirmed at Baa3 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to Baa3 (sf)

Cl. E, Affirmed at Ba2 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Cl. F, Affirmed at B1 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to B1 (sf)

Cl. G, Affirmed at B3 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to B3 (sf)

Cl. H, Affirmed at Caa2 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to Caa2 (sf)

Cl. J, Affirmed at Caa3 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to Caa3 (sf)

Cl. K, Affirmed at Ca (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to Ca (sf)

Cl. L, Affirmed at C (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to C (sf)

Cl. M, Affirmed at C (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to C (sf)

Cl. N, Affirmed at C (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2010 Downgraded to C (sf)

Cl. A-X, Affirmed at Ba3 (sf); previously on Feb 22, 2012 Downgraded to Ba3 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The affirmations of the principal classes are due to key parameters, including Moody's loan to value (LTV) ratio, Moody's stressed debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) and the Herfindahl Index (Herf), remaining within acceptable ranges. Based on our current base expected loss, the credit enhancement levels for the affirmed classes are sufficient to maintain their current ratings. The IO Class, Class IO, is affirmed since it is consistent with the credit performance of its referenced classes.

Moody's rating action reflects a base expected loss of 4.8% of the current balance compared to 6.5% at last review. Moody's provides a current list of base expected losses for conduit and fusion CMBS transactions on moodys.com at http://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBS_SF215255. Depending on the timing of loan payoffs and the severity and timing of losses from specially serviced loans, the credit enhancement level for investment grade classes could decline below the current levels. If future performance materially declines, the expected level of credit enhancement and the priority in the cash flow waterfall may be insufficient for the current ratings of these classes.

Moody's analysis reflects a forward-looking view of the likely range of collateral performance over the medium term. From time to time, Moody's may, if warranted, change these expectations. Performance that falls outside an acceptable range of the key parameters may indicate that the collateral's credit quality is stronger or weaker than Moody's had anticipated during the current review. Even so, deviation from the expected range will not necessarily result in a rating action. There may be mitigating or offsetting factors to an improvement or decline in collateral performance, such as increased subordination levels due to amortization and loan payoffs or a decline in subordination due to realized losses.

Primary sources of assumption uncertainty are the extent of growth in the current macroeconomic environment and commercial real estate property markets. Commercial real estate property values are continuing to move in a positive direction along with a rise in investment activity and stabilization in core property type performance. Limited new construction and moderate job growth have aided this improvement. However, a consistent upward trend will not be evident until the volume of investment activity steadily increases for a significant period, non-performing properties are cleared from the pipeline, and fears of a Euro area recession are abated.

The hotel sector is performing strongly with eight straight quarters of growth and the multifamily sector continues to show increases in demand with a growing renter base and declining home ownership. Slow recovery in the office sector continues with minimal additions to supply. However, office demand is closely tied to employment, where growth remains slow and employers are considering decreases in the leased space per employee. Also, primary urban markets are outperforming secondary suburban markets. Performance in the retail sector continues to be mixed with retail rents declining for the past four years, weak demand for new space and lackluster sales driven by discounting and promotions. However, rising wages and reduced unemployment, along with increased consumer confidence, is helping to spur consumer spending resulting in increased sales. Across all property sectors, the availability of debt capital continues to improve with robust securitization activity of commercial real estate loans supported by a monetary policy of low interest rates.

Moody's central global macroeconomic scenario maintains its forecast of relatively robust growth in the US and an expectation of a mild recession in the euro area for 2012. Downside risks remain significant, and elevated downside risks and their materialization could pose a serious threat to the outlook. Major downside risks include: a deeper than expected recession in the euro area; the potential for a hard landing in major emerging markets; an oil supply shock; and material fiscal tightening in the US given recent political gridlock. Healthy but below-trend growth in GDP is expected through the rest of this year and next with risks trending to the downside.

The methodologies used in this rating were "Moody's Approach to Rating U.S. CMBS Conduit Transactions" published in September 2000, "Moody's Approach to Rating CMBS Large Loan/Single Borrower Transactions" published in July 2000 and "Moody's Approach to Rating Structured Finance Interest-Only Securities" published in February 2012. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.

Moody's review incorporated the use of the excel-based CMBS Conduit Model v 2.61 which is used for both conduit and fusion transactions. Conduit model results at the Aa2 (sf) level are driven by property type, Moody's actual and stressed DSCR, and Moody's property quality grade (which reflects the capitalization rate used by Moody's to estimate Moody's value). Conduit model results at the B2 (sf) level are driven by a pay down analysis based on the individual loan level Moody's LTV ratio. Moody's Herfindahl score (Herf), a measure of loan level diversity, is a primary determinant of pool level diversity and has a greater impact on senior certificates. Other concentrations and correlations may be considered in our analysis. Based on the model pooled credit enhancement levels at Aa2 (sf) and B2 (sf), the remaining conduit classes are either interpolated between these two data points or determined based on a multiple or ratio of either of these two data points. For fusion deals, the credit enhancement for loans with investment-grade credit assessments is melded with the conduit model credit enhancement into an overall model result. Fusion loan credit enhancement is based on the underlying credit assessment of the loan which corresponds to a range of credit enhancement levels. Actual fusion credit enhancement levels are selected based on loan level diversity, pool leverage and other concentrations and correlations within the pool. Negative pooling, or adding credit enhancement at the underlying rating level, is incorporated for loans with similar credit assessments in the same transaction.

Moody's review also incorporated the CMBS IO calculator ver1.1 which uses the following inputs to calculate the proposed IO rating based on the published methodology: original and current bond ratings and credit estimates; original and current bond balances grossed up for losses for all bonds the IO(s) reference(s) within the transaction; and IO type corresponding to an IO type as defined in the published methodology. The calculator then returns a calculated IO rating based on both a target and mid-point. For example, a target rating basis for a Baa3 (sf) rating is a 610 rating factor. The midpoint rating basis for a Baa3 (sf) rating is 775 (i.e. the simple average of a Baa3 (sf) rating factor of 610 and a Ba1 (sf) rating factor of 940). If the calculated IO rating factor is 700, the CMBS IO calculator ver1.1 would provide both a Baa3 (sf) and Ba1 (sf) IO indication for consideration by the rating committee.

Moody's uses a variation of Herf to measure diversity of loan size, where a higher number represents greater diversity. Loan concentration has an important bearing on potential rating volatility, including risk of multiple notch downgrades under adverse circumstances. The credit neutral Herf score is 40. The pool has a Herf of 16, the same as at last review.

In cases where the Herf falls below 20, Moody's also employs the large loan/single borrower methodology. This methodology uses the excel-based Large Loan Model v 8.5 and then reconciles and weights the results from the two models in formulating a rating recommendation. The large loan model derives credit enhancement levels based on an aggregation of adjusted loan level proceeds derived from Moody's loan level LTV ratios. Major adjustments to determining proceeds include leverage, loan structure, property type, and sponsorship. These aggregated proceeds are then further adjusted for any pooling benefits associated with loan level diversity, other concentrations and correlations.

Moody's ratings are determined by a committee process that considers both quantitative and qualitative factors. Therefore, the rating outcome may differ from the model output.

The rating action is a result of Moody's on-going surveillance of commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS) transactions. Moody's monitors transactions on a monthly basis through a review utilizing MOST® (Moody's Surveillance Trends) Reports and a proprietary program that highlights significant credit changes that have occurred in the last month as well as cumulative changes since the last full transaction review. On a periodic basis, Moody's also performs a full transaction review that involves a rating committee and a press release. Moody's prior transaction review is summarized in a press release dated December 1, 2011. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer / entity page on moodys.com for the last rating action and the ratings history.

DEAL PERFORMANCE

As of the October 17, 2012 distribution date, the transaction's aggregate certificate balance has decreased 29% to $1.3 billion from $1.9 billion at securitization. The Certificates are collateralized by 178 mortgage loans ranging in size from less than 1% to 23% of the pool. Nine loans, representing 4.0% of the pool, have defeased and are backed by U.S. Government securities. There are no loans with an investment grade credit assessment.

There are presently 47 loans, representing 19% of the pool, on the master servicer's watchlist. The watchlist includes loans which meet certain portfolio review guidelines established as part of the CRE Finance Council (CREFC) monthly reporting package. As part of our ongoing monitoring of a transaction, Moody's reviews the watchlist to assess which loans have material issues that could impact performance.

Twenty-four loans have been liquidated from the pool since securitization, resulting in an aggregate $33.2 million loss (21% loss severity on average). Currently eight loans, representing 4% of the pool, are in special servicing. Moody's has estimated a $20.5 million loss (39% expected loss on average) for the specially serviced loans.

Moody's has assumed a high default probability for five poorly performing loans representing 2% of the pool and has estimated a $4.4 million aggregate loss (22% expected loss based on a 50% probability of default) from these troubled loans.

Moody's was provided with full year 2011 and partial year 2012 operating results for 99% and 91% of the performing pool, respectively. Excluding specially serviced and troubled loans, Moody's weighted average conduit LTV is 93% compared to 94% at last review. Moody's net cash flow reflects a weighted average haircut of 11.1% to the most recently available net operating income. Moody's value reflects a weighted average capitalization rate of 8.9%.

Excluding specially serviced and troubled loans, Moody's actual and stressed conduit DSCRs are 1.27X and 1.1X, respectively, compared to 1.26X and 1.07X, respectively, at last full review. Moody's actual DSCR is based on Moody's net cash flow (NCF) and the loan's actual debt service. Moody's stressed DSCR is based on Moody's NCF and a 9.25% stressed rate applied to the loan balance.

The top three performing loans represent 30% of the pool balance. The largest loan is the Time Warner Retail Loan ($299.3 million -- 22.6% of the pool), which is secured by a 343,000 square foot (SF) retail center located at Columbus Circle between West 58th and West 60th Street in New York City. The largest tenants are Whole Foods (17% of the net rentable area (NRA); lease expiration January 2024) and Equinox (12% of the NRA; lease expiration February 2019). The property was 85% leased as of June 2012 compared to 99% at last review. Despite the decline in occupancy, financial performance increased in 2011. This loan has amortized 6.5% since securitization. Moody's LTV and stressed DSCR are 92% and 0.94X, respectively, compared to 95% and 0.92X at last review.

The second largest loan is the AT&T Consumer Services Headquarters Loan ($49.6 million -- 3.7% of the pool), which is secured by a 387,000 SF office building located in Morris Township, New Jersey. The property is 100% leased to AT&T Consumer Services (Moody's senior unsecured rating - A2, on watch for possible downgrade) through September 2014. AT&T has been in the building since it was built in 1979 and has renewed its lease multiple times but has no remaining options to extend the lease beyond the currently scheduled 2014 lease expiration date. The loan was interest only until its anticipated repayment date (ARD) of October 2009 at which point the interest rate increased from 5.35% to 7.35%. The loan began to amortize and all excess cash flow is applied to reduce the outstanding principal balance. Since the ARD date, the loan has amortized 14%. The loan is on the servicer's watchlist for missing its ARD but is performing. The final maturity date is in October 2034. Moody's analysis incorporated a stressed cash flow due to the tenancy risk associated with the single tenant exposure, the near-term lease expiration and lack of extension options. Moody's LTV and stressed DSCR are 119% and 0.82X, respectively, compared to 122% and 0.8X at last review.

The third largest exposure is the BECO Portfolio Loan ($45.8 million -- 3.5% of the pool), which consists of three cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted loans secured by 14 adjacent office buildings located 10 miles northeast of Washington, D.C. in Lanham, Maryland. As of June 2012, the portfolio was 74% leased compared to 76% at last review and 89% at securitization. Two of the three loans are on the master servicer's watchlist for low DSCR. The loan matures in September 2014. This loan has amortized 12% since securitization. Moody's LTV and stressed DSCR are 119% and 0.91X, respectively, compared to 108% and 0.9X at last review.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Gregory Reed Vice President - Senior Analyst Structured Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653Sandra Ruffin VP - Senior Credit Officer Structured Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Kommentare zu diesem Artikel

Geben Sie jetzt einen Kommentar zu diesem Artikel ab.
Kommentar hinzufügen
  • Relevant
  • Alle
  • vom Unternehmen
  • Peer Group
  • Twitter
  • Sprache:
  • Alle
  • DE
  • EN
  • Reload
  • Sortieren:
  • Datum
  • meistgelesen
Um Ihnen die Übersicht über die große Anzahl an Nachrichten, die jeden Tag für ein Unternehmen erscheinen, etwas zu erleichtern, haben wir den Nachrichtenfeed in folgende Kategorien aufgeteilt:

Relevant: Nachrichten von ausgesuchten Quellen, die sich im Speziellen mit diesem Unternehmen befassen
Alle: Alle Nachrichten, die dieses Unternehmen betreffen. Z.B. auch Marktberichte die außerdem auch andere Unternehmen betreffen
vom Unternehmen: Nachrichten und Adhoc-Meldungen, die vom Unternehmen selbst veröffentlicht werden
Peer Group: Nachrichten von Unternehmen, die zur Peer Group gehören
Twitter: Tweets mit dem Cashtag des Unternehmens

Analysen zu AT&T Inc. (AT & T Inc.)

mehr
  • Alle
  • Buy
  • Hold
  • Sell
25.03.14AT&T NeutralHSBC
23.09.13AT&T haltenUBS AG
15.07.13AT&T verkaufenIndependent Research GmbH
15.07.13AT&T haltenCitigroup Corp.
28.01.13AT&T haltenDeutsche Bank AG
13.12.12AT&T buyNomura
12.12.12AT&T overweightJP Morgan Chase & Co.
11.12.12AT&T overweightHSBC
08.11.12AT&T buySarasin Research
06.11.12AT&T buyNomura
25.03.14AT&T NeutralHSBC
23.09.13AT&T haltenUBS AG
15.07.13AT&T haltenCitigroup Corp.
28.01.13AT&T haltenDeutsche Bank AG
18.12.12AT&T sector performRBC Capital Markets
15.07.13AT&T verkaufenIndependent Research GmbH
25.10.12AT&T verkaufenIndependent Research GmbH
01.08.12AT&T verkaufenIndependent Research GmbH
15.12.11AT&T underperformMacquarie Research
03.11.06Update MediaOne Group Inc.: UnderperformFriedman, Billings Ramsey & Co
Um die Übersicht zu verbessern, haben Sie die Möglichkeit, die Analysen für AT&T Inc. (AT & T Inc.) nach folgenden Kriterien zu filtern.

Alle: Alle Empfehlungen
Buy: Kaufempfehlungen wie z.B. "kaufen" oder "buy"
Hold: Halten-Empfehlungen wie z.B. "halten" oder "neutral"
Sell: Verkaufsempfehlungn wie z.B. "verkaufen" oder "reduce"

AKTIEN IN DIESEM ARTIKEL

ANZEIGE

Private Krankenversicherung Tarifvergleich

Anzeige

ANZEIGE

Die 5 beliebtesten Top-Rankings






Die Zahl der Beschwerden von Privatversicherten über ihre Krankenkasse ist 2013 leicht gesunken. Wie Zufrieden sind Sie mit Ihrer Krankenkasse?
Ich gehöre zu denen die sich beim Ombudsmann der privaten Krankenversicherung (PKV) beschwert haben.
Ich war im letzten Jahr unzufrieden, habe mich aber nicht beschwert.
Ich hatte keine Probleme mit meiner Versicherung
Abstimmen