30.11.2012 18:12
Bewerten
 (0)

Moody's assigns definitive Aaa (sf) ratings to Prime RMBS issued by Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6

New York, November 30, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned definitive ratings to five classes of Aaa (sf) residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issued by Sequoia Mortgage Trust (SEMT) 2012-6. The certificates are backed by prime quality, first-lien 30-year and 20-year fixed-rate mortgage loans. The borrowers in this pool have high FICO scores, significant liquid cash reserves and equity in their properties.

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6

Cl. A-1, Assigned Aaa (sf) Cl. A-2, Assigned Aaa (sf) Cl. A-IO1, Assigned Aaa (sf) Cl. A-IO2, Assigned Aaa (sf) Cl. A-IO3, Assigned Aaa (sf) RATINGS RATIONALE Summary Credit Analysis and Rating Rationale

Moody's expected cumulative net loss on this pool is 0.35%. Aaa (sf) subordination for this transaction is 7.05%, which is consistent with Moody's collateral loss and structural analyses. In addition to using Mortgage Portfolio Analyzer to determine pool loss levels, Moody's performed a supplementary analysis of frequency and severity for prime loans in a stressed economy. Moody's determined the lifetime frequency of default for the worst performing jumbo loan vintage--the 2007 vintage--and augmented the 2007 vintage's actual default performance with its projection of future defaults by applying its RMBS surveillance methodology. Moody's severity analysis stressed home prices on a state-by-state, and in some cases an MSA basis, assuming another 33% decline on a national basis. Moody's further stressed the resulting default frequency to account for erosion of credit enhancement due to the shifting interest structure (further detailed below).

Collateral Description

The SEMT 2012-6 transaction is a securitization of 358 first lien residential mortgage loans, with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $301,462,461. There are 38 originators in the transaction including First Republic Bank , representing 12.5% of the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loans, Fremont Bank (9.3%), PrimeLending (9.1%), Flagstar Bank (8.5%), United Shore Financial Services (8.1%), Cornerstone Mortgage Company (6.3%) and WJ Bradley (5.5%). The remaining 31 originators each account for less than 5% of the principal balance of the loans in the pool and provide reps and warranties to the transaction. Although the financial strength of most of the originators does not meet our criteria for Aaa (sf) ratings, this risk was mitigated by a third-party review of all of the loans contributed by the unrated originators. The loan-level review encompassed credit underwriting, property value and regulatory compliance. In addition, Redwood has agreed to backstop the rep and warranty repurchase obligation of the financially weaker originators.

The loans were all aggregated by Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation (Redwood), which Moody's has assessed as an Above Average aggregator of prime jumbo residential mortgages. There have been no losses on Redwood-aggregated transactions that closed in 2010 and later, and delinquencies to date have also been very low. For 2010 to 2012 SEMT transactions, no loan has ever been more than 60 days delinquent.

Hurricane Sandy

Nine of the loans in the pool are located in counties for which FEMA has made a disaster declaration as a result of damage caused by Hurricane Sandy. Redwood hired real estate agents to perform external property inspections for these nine properties. There was no damage detected by the inspections. In addition, Redwood has made a representation that all loans in the pool are not damaged as of the closing date of the transaction. As a result, Redwood will be obligated to repurchase or substitute loans secured by damaged properties, or make indemnification payments to the trust for loans secured by properties that were damaged by the hurricane and were not removed prior to closing.

Third-party Review and Reps & Warranties

Third party due diligence underwriters verified the accuracy of the loan-level information the sponsor provided us. They also performed detailed credit, collateral, legal and regulatory compliance review on 94% of the loans (by number) in the pool. The review found that the majority of reviewed loans were compliant with Redwood's underwriting guidelines and had no valuation or regulatory defects. The loans that were not compliant with Redwood's underwriting guidelines had strong compensating factors.

Trustee & Master Servicer

The transaction trustee, Christiana Trust, has very limited experience in RMBS, which raises some operational concerns. These concerns are mitigated by the fact that the custodian, paying agent and cash management functions will be performed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. rather than the trustee. In addition, Wells Fargo, as Master Servicer, (rated SQ1-) is responsible for servicer oversight, and termination of servicers and for the appointment of successor servicers. In addition, Wells Fargo is committed to act as successor if no other successor servicer can be found.

Tail Risk & Subordination Floor

The transaction cash flows follow a shifting interest structure that allows subordinated bonds to receive principal payments under certain defined scenarios. Because a shifting interest structure allows subordinated bonds to pay down over time as the loan pool shrinks, senior bonds are exposed to increased performance volatility, known as tail risk. Moody's believes tail risk is greater in this pool than in the previous SEMT transactions because the loans' low interest rates will discourage voluntary prepayments. However, the transaction provides for a subordination floor of 1.25% of the closing pool balance, which mitigates tail risk by protecting the senior bonds from eroding credit enhancement over time.

Sensitivity Analysis

We tested the sensitivity of the senior notes to increases in our Aaa stressed losses. Our current Aaa stressed loss level is 6.75% without taking into account the transaction structure. If our Aaa stressed loss level were 8.25%, all else being equal, the quantitative calculation would indicate a rating level of Aa2 (sf) for senior certificates, or two notches below the Aaa (sf) rating. If our Aaa stressed loss level were 10.75%, all else being equal, the quantitative calculation would indicate a rating of A1 (sf) for senior certificates, or four notches below the Aaa (sf) rating.

Parameter Sensitivities are not intended to measure how the rating of the security might migrate over time, rather they are designed to provide a quantitative calculation of how the initial rating might change if key input parameters used in the initial rating process differed. The analysis assumes that the deal has not aged. Parameter Sensitivities only reflect the ratings impact of each scenario from a quantitative/model-indicated standpoint. Qualitative factors are also taken into consideration in the ratings process, so the actual ratings that would be assigned in each case could vary from the information presented in the Parameter Sensitivity analysis.

Volatility Assumption Score

The V Score for this transaction is medium/high, which is equal to the medium/high score assigned for the US Prime Jumbo RMBS sector. However, there are differences between the drivers of the sector's V Score and this transaction's V Score.

The ratings and performance of US jumbo prime RMBS have been very volatile. Therefore, any transaction in this sector will have a 'high' V score pertaining to ratings and performance. On the other hand, there are many stabilizing factors for this transaction. The disclosure of loan level data for this new issuance is superior to historical transactions. Information pertaining to borrower cash reserves, time in current job and origination channel analysis was not only provided, but reviewed by an independent third party. Also, the structure for this RMBS incorporates a subordination floor of 1.25% and fewer number of tranches as compared to an average existing transaction in the sector. These factors add to the stability of ratings. Additionally, deal governance mechanisms are stronger than the sector average. Specifically, reps and warranties are much better and stronger than the sector average, and have a workable remedial process. While not all of the rep providers are financially strong entities, all of the loans originated by those rep providers have been reviewed by a third party for credit, valuation and regulatory compliance. V Scores are a relative assessment of the quality of available credit information and of the degree of uncertainty around various assumptions used in determining the rating. High variability in key assumptions could expose a rating to a greater likelihood of rating changes.

The V Score has been assigned consistent with the report "V Scores and Parameter Sensitivities in the US RMBS Sector," published in April 2009.

Rating Methodology: The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Approach to Rating U.S. Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities," published in December 2008. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

While assessing the ratings on this transaction, Moody's deviated from its published methodology as outlined below:

The output of Mortgage Portfolio Analyzer was used as one input for loss estimation. Alternative analytical inputs including a frequency and severity analysis based upon 2007 vintage performance, with significant weight put on expert judgment were also taken into account, including the aggregate impact of the third-party review and the quality of the servicers and originators.

In addition, Moody's publishes a weekly summary of structured finance credit ratings and methodologies, available to all registered users of our website, www.moodys.com/SFQuickCheck.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Analytics information.

Moody's received and took into account one or more third-party assessments on the due diligence performed regarding the underlying assets or financial instruments in this transaction and the assessments had a neutral impact on the rating.

Further information on the representations and warranties and enforcement mechanisms available to investors are available on http://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBS_SF308598.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Todd SwansonAsst Vice President - Analyst Structured Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.One Front Street Suite 1900 San Francisco, CA 94111 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653Kruti Muni VP - Senior Credit Officer Structured Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Artikel empfehlen?

Nachrichten zu Wells Fargo & Co.

  • Relevant1
  • Alle1
  • vom Unternehmen
  • Peer Group
  • ?
01:10 Uhr
22.10.14
Wells Fargo Banks on European Real Estate (EN, Wall Street Journal Europe)
22.10.14
20.10.14
17.10.14
Um Ihnen die Übersicht über die große Anzahl an Nachrichten, die jeden Tag für ein Unternehmen erscheinen, etwas zu erleichtern, haben wir den Nachrichtenfeed in folgende Kategorien aufgeteilt:

Relevant: Nachrichten von ausgesuchten Quellen, die sich im Speziellen mit diesem Unternehmen befassen
Alle: Alle Nachrichten, die dieses Unternehmen betreffen. Z.B. auch Marktberichte die außerdem auch andere Unternehmen betreffen
vom Unternehmen: Nachrichten und Adhoc-Meldungen, die vom Unternehmen selbst veröffentlicht werden
Peer Group: Nachrichten von Unternehmen, die zur Peer Group gehören

RSS Feed

Analysen zu Wells Fargo & Co.

  • Alle
  • Buy
  • Hold
  • Sell
  • ?
16.10.2014Wells FargoCo BuyArgus Research Company
15.10.2014Wells FargoCo NeutralCompass Point
02.07.2013Wells FargoCo kaufenMerrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
15.01.2013Wells FargoCo haltenOppenheimer & Co. Inc.
03.10.2012Wells FargoCo holdDeutsche Bank Securities
16.10.2014Wells FargoCo BuyArgus Research Company
02.07.2013Wells FargoCo kaufenMerrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
20.08.2012Wells FargoCo kaufenDie Actien-Börse
24.05.2012Wells FargoCo overweightBarclays Capital
10.05.2012Wells FargoCo overweightBarclays Capital
15.10.2014Wells FargoCo NeutralCompass Point
15.01.2013Wells FargoCo haltenOppenheimer & Co. Inc.
03.10.2012Wells FargoCo holdDeutsche Bank Securities
17.09.2012Wells FargoCo holdStifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.
16.04.2012Wells FargoCo neutralUBS AG
13.04.2010Wells Fargo "sell"UBS AG
17.07.2008Wells Fargo underperformFriedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc.
05.02.2008Wells Fargo sellStifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.
Um die Übersicht zu verbessern, haben Sie die Möglichkeit, die Analysen für Wells Fargo & Co. nach folgenden Kriterien zu filtern.

Alle: Alle Empfehlungen
Buy: Kaufempfehlungen wie z.B. "kaufen" oder "buy"
Hold: Halten-Empfehlungen wie z.B. "halten" oder "neutral"
Sell: Verkaufsempfehlungn wie z.B. "verkaufen" oder "reduce"

Für den Live-Chat können Sie sich mit Ihrem finanzen.net-, Facebook- oder Twitter Account anmelden. Um immer die neusten Beiträge zu sehen, stellen Sie bitte "Neuesten" ein.

Private Krankenversicherung Tarifvergleich

Heute im Fokus

Gewinnmitnahmen: DAX pendelt um 9.000 -- BASF: Gewinnwarnung für 2015 -- GfK-Konsumklima gewinnt überraschend alte Stärke -- Amazon macht mehr Verlust -- Microsoft, Volvo im Fokus

BaFin rechnet mit turbulenter Schlussphase der Bankenprüfung. Toyota trennt sich ebenfalls von Tesla-Anteilen. Air Liquide kann Umsatz leicht steigern. TLG Immobilien schafft Börsengang mit Zugeständnis beim Preis. Microsoft nutzt Marke Nokia nur noch für günstige Handys. Apple legt Streit mit gescheitertem Saphir-Lieferanten bei.
Die öffentliche Verschwendung

Die zehn teuersten Aktien der Welt

Diese Aktien sind auf den Verkauflisten der Experten

Umfrage

Verkehrsminister Dobrindt erwägt scheinbar, die Pkw-Maut vorerst nur auf Autobahnen einzuführen. Was halten Sie von diesem Rückzieher?

Anzeige