....EUR774.4M Class A Notes, Downgraded to Baa3 (sf); previously on Jan 20, 2012 Downgraded to A1 (sf)
Moody's does not rate the Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class F, and the Class G Notes.
Today's downgrade action reflects Moody's increased loss expectation for the pool since its last review. This is primarily due to the performance below expectation of the two German loans, EHE -- Pool 1A and EHE -- Pool 1B (67% of current pool), since last review, in particular the failure to deleverage the loans through disposals and the missed disposal target for the EHE -- Pool 1B Loan in October 2012.
Further drivers of Moody's increased loss expectation for the securitised portfolio are (i) the unexpected repayment of an above average loan from an expected loss perspective on a modified pro-rata basis preventing an increase in credit enhancement for the Class A Notes; and (ii) the downward pressure on property values for the type of retail properties backing the EHE -- Pool 1A and EHE -- Pool 1B Loans due to the decreasing weighted average remaining lease term and the sustained low investor appetite for this type of properties with rather short remaining lease terms.
A major concern for Class A Notes is that the principal payment allocation to the notes is still on a modified pro-rata basis and that disposal proceeds for the German loans will not be allocated sequentially. Due to the loan restructuring the servicer has not declared a default of the German loans and subsequently the sequential pay trigger has not been breached. Thus there is uncertainty around a potential future switch to sequential principal allocation depending on the servicer work-out strategy for the German loans.
The key parameters in Moody's analysis are the default probability of the securitised loans (both during the term and at maturity) as well as Moody's value assessment for the properties securing these loans. Moody's derives from those parameters a loss expectation for the securitised pool.
Based on Moody's revised assessment of these parameters, it expects large losses for the remaining pool driven by the German loans which exhibit an average Underwriter (UW) whole loan LTV of 134%.
Moody's current weighted average A-loan and whole loan LTV is 100% and 115% respectively. In comparison, the UW A-loan LTV is 95% and the whole loan LTV is 109%. Moody's notes that the moderate LTV levels for the remaining loans in France and in Spain have only a limited beneficial effect as they only represent 33% of the total pool and there is no cross collateralisation. For the two German loans the Moody's whole loan LTV ratios are well above 100%, translating into a high probability of default at maturity (>50%).
Due to these high LTV ratios, Moody's expects significant losses for EHE -- Pool 1A and EHE -- Pool 1B Loans of around 30% and 14% respectively.
Due to the high loan concentration and high expected loss for the two German loans, the rating of Class A is highly sensitive to the future evolution of property values for these loans. In Moody's view the values are subject to downward pressure in the future due to the secondary quality of the properties and the likely decreasing average lease term. Furthermore, the most recent valuations for EHE -- Pool 1A and EHE -- Pool 1B are respectively 24 months and 15 months old.
In general, Moody's analysis reflects a forward-looking view of the likely range of commercial real estate collateral performance over the medium term. From time to time, Moody's may, if warranted, change these expectations. Performance that falls outside an acceptable range of the key parameters such as property value or loan refinancing probability for instance, may indicate that the collateral's credit quality is stronger or weaker than Moody's had anticipated when the related securities ratings were issued. Even so, a deviation from the expected range will not necessarily result in a rating action nor does performance within expectations preclude such actions . There may be mitigating or offsetting factors to an improvement or decline in collateral performance, such as increased subordination levels due to amortisation and loan re- prepayments or a decline in subordination due to realised losses.
Primary sources of assumption uncertainty are the current stressed macro-economic environment and continued weakness in the occupational and lending markets. Moody's anticipates (i) delayed recovery in the lending market persisting through 2013, while remaining subject to strict underwriting criteria and heavily dependent on the underlying property quality, (ii) strong differentiation between prime and secondary properties, with further value declines expected for non-prime properties, and (iii) occupational markets will remain under pressure in the short term and will only slowly recover in the medium term in line with anticipated economic recovery. Overall, Moody's central global macroeconomic scenario is for a material slowdown in growth in 2012 for most of the world's largest economies fueled by fiscal consolidation efforts, household and banking sector deleveraging and persistently high unemployment levels. We expect a mild recession in the Euro area.
On 21 August 2012, Moody's released a Request for Comment seeking market feedback on proposed adjustments to its modelling assumptions. These adjustments are designed to account for the impact of rapid and significant country credit deterioration on structured finance transactions. If the adjusted approach is implemented as proposed, the rating of the notes affected by today rating action may be negatively affected. See "Approach to Assessing the Impact of a Rapid Country Credit Deterioration on Structured Finance Transactions", (http://www.moodys.com/research/Approach-to-Assessing-the-Impact-of-a-Rapid-Country-Credit--PBS_SF294880) for further details regarding the implications of the proposed methodology changes on Moody's ratings.
MOODY'S PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS
Infinity 2007-1 "SoPRANo" closed in May 2007 and represents the synthetic securitisation of initially 15 commercial mortgage loans which were either originated and arranged by IXIS CIB or represent a participation of IXIS CIB in loans originated by Capmark Bank Europe plc.
Since closing, four loans representing 34% of the initial portfolio balance have repaid. The Leipzig loan, the second largest loan in the pool, repaid in July 2012 and contributed for most of the repayments. However, due to the modified pro-rata allocation of repayment for the German loans, this did not improve the relative position of Class A in the capital structure. The Credit Enhancement remained stable at 25% since last review as the subordinated Classes continued to benefit from principal repayments. The overall effect of the Leipzig repayment was therefore negative for Class A, as while the Credit Enhancement of Class A remained stable the average quality of the remaining pool has decreased.
There are eleven loans remaining in the pool with two loans representing 67% of the total pool located in Germany, eight loans representing 22% of the total pool located in France, and one loan representing 11% of the total pool located in Spain.
Moody's uses a variation of the Herfindahl Index to measure diversity of loan size, where a higher number represents greater diversity. Large multi-borrower transactions typically have a Herf of less than 10 with an average of around 5. This pool has a Herf of 2.8, compared to 4.0 at closing. As indicated above, the pool exhibits an above average concentration in terms of geographic location with around two third of the loan pool located in Germany. The portfolio is also concentrated in terms of property types with approximately 88% of exposure to mainly secondary quality properties in the retail sector, 6% of warehouses, 1% of residential properties, 2% of offices and 2% of industrial properties. The aggregate outstanding balance of the securitised loans as of the last interest payment date in November 2012 is EUR658.4 million.
All the loans in the pool have been performing well from a cash flow perspective since the beginning of the transaction, with good coverage ratios and stable, predictable cash flows. The two German loans however suffer from a large decrease in property values which poses refinancing and principal recovery issues.
The largest loan in the pool, EHE -- Pool 1A (57% of the securitised pool), was subject to extensive restructurings in July 2011 which primarily included the extension of the loan maturity to October 2013 with two further one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions which focus on property disposals and LTV targets. The currently reported U/W senior loan LTV is 120% based on a valuation as of November 2010.
The loan is secured by a portfolio of 41 commercial real estate properties located across Germany. Based on U/W market value, approximately 80% of the portfolio are retail and shopping centre properties. The remaining 20% are logistic and other commercial properties. On average the property portfolio is composed of medium sized, secondary quality retail properties, but there are also four larger properties in the pool with values ranging from EUR40 million to EUR70 million UW market value each. Since closing the valuation has significantly decreased by 39%. The valuer's concern was that a significant number of properties are over-rented and the overall secondary, and in some cases tertiary nature of the properties. The WA remaining term to lease break is slightly lower than five years and the current passing rent is approximately EUR28 million.
As of today, more than one year after the restructuring, only one small property valued at around EUR2.5 million has been sold. In Moody's view a further extension of the loan maturity will be difficult but not impossible to achieve in October 2013. The disposal target of EUR60 million and the senior LTV target of 120% in October 2013 may be achieved if some of the biggest, above average quality properties are sold. This poses a risk of adverse selection whereas the portfolio quality will gradually deteriorate. Furthermore, as noted previously, the servicer has the possibility to waive the sales conditions and delay the process, there is therefore low visibility regarding the timing of the final maturity for the loan.
The other German loan, EHE -- Pool 1B (10% of the securitised pool) is secured by a portfolio of seven, mainly retail properties throughout Germany. The loan was subject to extensive restructurings in December 2011. Overall, the key restructuring terms follow the restructuring features of the EHE -- Pool 1A loan. The loan was also extended to October 2013 from its initial maturity date in October 2011, but differently, the disposal target date was in October 2012. The borrowers have missed the disposal target. This has triggered a "Managed Sell Down Period" of six months during which the different parties must agree on a disposal plan. As for EHE -- Pool 1A, there is low visibility as for the final maturity date of the loan and the timing of a possible default given that the servicer can waive the sales conditions and covenant breaches.
The financial covenants set at the senior loan level include an ICR covenant of 2.55x and an LTV covenant of 100% as of November 2012 reducing over time to 75% in October 2013. The currently reported A-Loan LTV is 95%. Moody's whole loan LTV is 111%.
The San Cugat loan (11% of the securitized pool) is secured by a shopping centre located in Sant Cugat del Valles, in the province of Barcelona. As of November 2012, the WA remaining lease term is approximately five years and the property is almost fully occupied (96.6%). Moody's LTV is stable at around 88% since last review. There is a medium probability of default at maturity in July 2016 (10% - 20%).
The other loans (22% of the securitized pool) are located in France and are all characterized by relatively low LTV, good coverage ratios and generally stable and predictable cash flows. Seven out of the eight French loans have Altarea Cogédim as sponsor, which Moody's considers to be a positive aspect. Overall the quality of the remaining loans is considered to be good.
Moody's expects a significant amount of losses on the securitised portfolio, stemming mainly from the high leverage on the two German loans.
The principle methodology used in this rating was Moody's Approach to Real Estate Analysis for CMBS in EMEA: Portfolio Analysis (MoRE Portfolio) published in April 2006. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.
Other factors used in this rating are described in European CMBS: 2012 Central Scenarios published in February 2012.
The updated assessment is a result of Moody's on-going surveillance of commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS) transactions. Moody's prior assessment is summarised in a press release dated 22 January 2012. The last Performance Overview for this transaction was published on 4 September 2012.
In rating this transaction, Moody's used both MoRE Portfolio and MoRE Cash Flow to model the cash-flows and determine the loss for each tranche. MoRE Portfolio evaluates a loss distribution by simulating the defaults and recoveries of the underlying portfolio of loans using a Monte Carlo simulation. This portfolio loss distribution, in conjunction with the loss timing calculated in MoRE Portfolio is then used in MoRE Cash Flow, where for each loss scenario on the assets, the corresponding loss for each class of notes is calculated taking into account the structural features of the notes.
As such, Moody's analysis encompasses the assessment of stressed scenarios.
Moody's ratings are determined by a committee process that considers both quantitative and qualitative factors. Therefore, the rating outcome may differ from the model output.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.
Moody's did not receive or take into account a third-party assessment on the due diligence performed regarding the underlying assets or financial instruments related to the monitoring of this transaction in the past six months.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Emmanuel SavoyeAsst Vice President - Analyst Structured Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Oliver Moldenhauer Vice President - Senior Analyst Structured Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Heute im Fokus
Commerzbank mit Gewinneinbruch. Neue Spekulationen über Marktstart des Apple Car. US-Telekom-Rivale Sprint weiter tief in den roten Zahlen. Allianz will sich bei Pimco stärker einmischen. Nintendo-Aktie stürzt ab - Ernüchterung über "Pokémon Go". ifo-Geschäftsklima trübt sich nach Brexit-Votum nur leicht ein. Philips schlägt sich erneut besser als gedacht.
Welche deutsche Stadt hat die meiste Kohle?
Diese Aktien stehen auf den Verkauflisten der Experten
Die wertvollsten Marken 2016