The rating action is based on the audited IFRS accounts for 2011 and the unaudited IFRS accounts for H1 2012.
Moody's said the downgrade of Renaissance Financial Holding Limited's long-term issuer ratings to B2 reflects the company's (1) continued loss-making performance -- for the third consecutive year -- which negatively affects its financial fundamentals; and (2) challenges to adjust to the unfavourable economic environment in its main markets following the global financial crisis.
Renaissance Financial Holding Limited has been unsuccessful in its efforts to develop a balanced profit-generating model during the past three years against the background of changing market realities and challenging operating environment. Moreover, the costly investment banking workforce and IT platform are no longer matched with its earning opportunities because demand for investment products in Russia has declined and competition has intensified (including from state banks). Moody's observes that some of the company's expenses were due to expansion plans outside the Commonwealth of Independent States, and the company had achieved some success in geographical diversification into emerging markets outside Russia. However, the rating agency notes that the new revenues are not sufficient to compensate for the significant drop in trading income on the Russian market after 2008 and the subsequent reduced investment banking transactions. As a result, the compensation-to-revenue ratio and non-compensation-to-revenue ratio were as high as 57% and 51%, respectively, in H1 2012; therefore, expenses exceeded operating revenues. According to the company, significant cost-cutting efforts have being undertaken in 2012, but these are expected to impact the company's profitability only in H2 2012 and 2013.
Moody's said that in H1 2012, Renaissance Financial Holding Limited's revenues from the operating activities (excluding extraordinary items and income from trading with the Renaissance group -- which is de-facto support from the group) were extremely low (approximately $30 million in H1 2012, vs. approximately $220 million in 2011), such that Renaissance Financial Holding Limited would have reported a loss of at least $110 million or 13% of the 'beginning period equity' in H1 2012 (vs. the $14 million loss actually reported). However, due to extraordinary gains (e.g., revaluation, reserves recovery and trading gains with related parties), Renaissance Financial Holding Limited lost only 1.5% of its 'beginning period equity' in H1 2012.
Liquidity and Capital
As a result of the decline in Renaissance Financial Holding Limited's equity and some increase in illiquid positions, liquidity has become more vulnerable as equity is below the level of the company's illiquid assets. However, liquidity still remains adequate, and the company is capable of facing a medium-sized, prolonged and unexpected market dislocation given the short maturity of the majority of assets. According to the company, some illiquid positions have been sold in H2 2012 and there are plans to sell a significant share of illiquid assets by the end of Q1 2013. In addition, Moody's observes that capital is still sufficient to absorb substantial market losses.
The negative outlook on the ratings of Renaissance Financial Holding Limited reflects Moody's view that the company will face continued risks as it seeks to rebuild its profit-generating business model, and that future losses will negatively impact financial indicators such as capital and liquidity.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATINGS UP/DOWN
Negative pressure could be exerted on Renaissance Financial Holding Limited's ratings as a result of continued operational loss-making performance, and/or any increase of illiquid risk assets in proportion to equity. Any significant reduction of capital as a result of further losses could also have negative rating implications.
Renaissance Financial Holding Limited's ratings are unlikely to be upgraded in the medium term. However, the rating outlook may be changed to stable in case of (1) significant improvements in profitability; and (2) sustained reduced involvement in financing of illiquid assets, including other group segments.
The principal methodology used in this rating was Global Securities Industry Methodology published in December 2006. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
Renaissance Financial Holding Limited is the investment banking arm of the Renaissance Group, which also includes consumer finance, asset management and merchant banking. The company reported total consolidated assets of approximately $5 billion and total equity of approximately $901 million under (unaudited) IFRS at end-H1 2012.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Vladlen KuznetsovAsst Vice President - Analyst Financial Institutions Group Moody'sInterfax Rating Agency 7th floor, Four Winds Plaza21 1st Tverskaya-Yamskaya St.Moscow 125047 Russia Telephone: +7 495 228 6060 Facsimile: +7 495 228 6091 Yves J Lemay MD - Banking Financial Institutions Group JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Heute im Fokus
Gerücht über Investoren-Interesse an HPE lässt Aktie steigen. Rettungsplan für Krisenbank Monte dei Paschi rückt näher. VW hadert weiter mit US-Klagen - Hunderte neue Mitarbeiter nötig. Sinkflug der Ölpreise durch schwache US-Daten etwas ausgebremst. AB InBev nimmt letzte Wettbewerbshürde vor SABMiller-Fusion. US-Notenbanker Williams: Zwei Zinsanhebungen in diesem Jahr möglich. US-Wirtschaft wächst nur halb so stark wie erhofft.
Diesen Berufsgruppen trauen die Deutschen
Diese Firmen sind innovativ
Welche deutsche Stadt hat die meiste Kohle?