University of Connecticut, CT -- Moody's assigns Aa2 rating to University of Connecticut's $90 million Special Obligation Student Fee Revenue Bonds, 2012 Refunding Series A; outlook is stable
New York, November 16, 2012 -- Moody's Rating
Issue: Special Obligation Student Fee Revenue Bonds, 2012 Refunding Series A; Rating: Aa2; Sale Amount: $90,000,000; Expected Sale Date: 11-20-2012; Rating Description: Revenue: Public University Broad Pledge
Moody's has assigned a Aa2 rating to the University of Connecticut's (UConn) $90 million Special Obligation Student Fee Revenue Bonds, 2012 Refunding Series A. We have affirmed the Aa2 rating on UConn's outstanding Special Obligation Student Fee Revenue Bonds. The rating outlook is stable.
The university has approximately $903 million of General Obligation (G.O.) debt outstanding rated Aa3 secured by the State's Debt Service Commitment ("DSC") that are a legal obligation of the university, but are expected to be paid for by the State of Connecticut (State G.O. rating of Aa3).
SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE:
University of Connecticut's Aa2 rating for the Special Obligation Student Fee bonds reflects the strong debt service coverage from pledged revenues, the university's position as the state's flagship and land grant university, substantial state funding for capital investment at its campuses and the university's research activities that will benefit from the state's investment in the BioScience initiative with the construction and opening of a new research institute operated by Jackson Laboratory. Offsetting the strengths are a modest balance sheet resource cushion relative to Aa2-rated institutions, vulnerability to federal cuts in sponsored research funding in the face of fierce competition for grant awards, indirect healthcare exposure through the University of Connecticut Health Center and stagnant to declining direct operation appropriations.
*Established student market position as the State of Connecticut's flagship and land-grant public university, with enrollment of 25,999 full-time equivalent (FTE) students for fall 2011 across multiple campuses; headcount enrollment for fall 2012 is down slightly.
*Extraordinary state support for capital investment for UConn and the University of Connecticut Health Center (UCHC). In addition to a commitment to issue almost $27 billion to expand and update the UConn campuses, the state is also providing substantial funding for the construction and operation of The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine (a unit of Jackson Laboratory, rated A1, stable outlook) on UCHC's Farmington campus.
*Strong debt service coverage of Student Fee bonds from pledged revenue streams (5.6 times debt service coverage for preliminary FY 2012 and a forecast of generally comparable results for the current FY 2013).
*Consistently favorable operating performance, with a 4.2% average operating margin for FY 2009-FY 2011 and a 18.4% operating cash flow margin for FY 2011, both as calculated by Moody's and including the state's debt service commitments for interest on the G.O. bonds.
*No debt plans for the Student Fee bonds, and conservative debt structure, with all fixed rate amortizing debt.
*Modest financial resources relative to other Aa2-rated flagship universities with expectations of only modest growth. FY 2011 expendable financial resources of $294 million cushion operations 0.3 times and pro-forma debt (including the current debt) only 0.3 times. Coverage improves to a stronger 1.5 times excluding the G.O. bonds recognizing the state's debt service commitment.
*Vulnerable to likely reduced federal research funding due to federal budget pressures in the face of high competition for research awards. The opening of a major research facility on UCHC's campus should benefit UConn by accommodating more research activities and helping achieve success in research awards.
*Indirect healthcare exposure through UCHC, which includes The John Dempsey Hospital and the UConn Medical Group and Dentists. UCHC is funded separately by the state and is not considered a component unit of the university and not included in its audit. If consolidated, UCHC's patient care revenues would represent about 22% of operating revenues.
*Overall decline in state direct operating appropriations in recent years, although the state has continued to fully fund the university's benefits, including the contributions to the pension plans.
The stable outlook reflects expectations of ongoing state support for UCONN 2000 projects, particularly for continued debt service support on G.O. bonds, and stable student demand and health care market positions, with modest growth in balance sheet resources.
WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO UP
Significant growth of liquid financial resources coupled with consistently strong operating performance; strengthening of the state's credit profile
WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN
Downgrade of the state's rating; additional student fee revenue borrowing absent growth of financial resources and revenue to pay for debt service; sustained deterioration of student demand resulting in declining enrollment and stagnant to lower net tuition revenues; sustained lower research funding
PRINCIPAL RATING METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in this rating was U.S. Not-for-Profit Private and Public Higher Education published in August 2011. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service's information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Diane F. Viacava VP - Senior Credit Officer Public Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653Edith Behr VP - Senior Credit Officer Public Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Private Krankenversicherung Tarifvergleich
Heute im Fokus
US-Aufsicht wirft Deutscher Bank schwerwiegende Mängel vor. US-Verbraucherpreise legen im Juni weiter zu. Marlboro-Hersteller Altria verdient weniger. United Technologies verdient mehr. Fresenius will Aktiensplit am 1. August umsetzen. Hagel und Stürme treffen US-Versicherer Travelers. Verizon mit starkem Wachstum.