Multi-wallet usage up 16%, but AI may address crypto fragmentation gap
Fragmentation and complicated user experience remain two of the most significant obstacles to cryptocurrency’s mainstream adoption, according to a new industry report. Most users now use at least two wallets to manage their cryptocurrency investments.The lack of interoperability across blockchains means users need to create multiple wallets to interact with different networks, with users having at least two wallets rising by 16% over the past year. According to a research report published by onchain user experience platform Reown and crypto intelligence firm Nansen, 62% of crypto users reported using at least two wallets over the past three months, up from 45% in 2024.More than 18% of respondents said security was their top concern related to wallet use, while 10.6% cited poor user experience as the biggest issue.Wallet usage over the past 3 months. Source: Nansen, ReownRelated: Bitcoin volatility lowest in 563 days, Hayes predicts $1M BTC by 2028AI integration may be next “breakthrough” for crypto wallets“We’re at a pivotal moment in the evolution of wallet UX,” according to Eowyn Chen, the CEO at Trust Wallet. “The next wave of users, especially those coming from traditional Web2 or emerging markets, are bringing new expectations that challenge how we design tools and interfaces.”Chen said wallets are shifting from asset storage tools to becoming the primary gateway to Web3 services, including digital identity, financial products, governance and gaming.“That’s why we see wallets evolving into intelligent, personal companions — tools that not only hold your assets, but understand your behaviour, preferences, and needs,” she said.Chen added that integrating artificial intelligence agents could help users navigate Web3 as easily as they shop online, while also reducing risks from scams such as phishing attacks. These scams typically involve tricking victims into sending assets to fake wallet addresses.The need for more robust wallets became more apparent after an unknown attacker stole $330 million worth of Bitcoin (BTC) in a social engineering scam from an elderly US citizen, Cointelegraph reported on April 28.Related: Crypto hackers hit DeFi for $92M in April as attacks double from MarchMobile wallets dominate, hardware wallet usage on the riseOut of the 1,000 surveyed participants, 51% of users preferred using a mobile wallet, down from 54.8% in 2024.Mobile vs hardware wallet usage. Source: Nansen, ReownOnly 10% of the respondents preferred using a hardware wallet, up from just 7% a year ago, signaling that hardware wallets are slowly gaining traction among more advanced crypto users. However, only 3% of new investors reported using a hardware wallet.Social wallets, which are connected to a user’s email or other social account and require no seed phrase, have “transformed onboarding,” and are at the “forefront of UX innovation, quickly adopting technologies like passkey signers and gas abstraction,” according to Derek Rein, chief technical officer at Reown. He added:“Crucially, they prioritize simple, easy design, users shouldn’t need to understand gas tokens or chain switching just to transact.”Sentiment around social wallets. Source: Nansen, Reown However, users are still hesitant, with 39% of surveyed respondents saying that improved security and trust would help them adopt social wallets.Magazine: Ethereum is destroying the competition in the $16.1T TradFi tokenization raceWeiter zum vollständigen Artikel bei Cointelegraph Weiter zum vollständigen Artikel bei Cointelegraph
Übrigens: Gap und andere US-Aktien sind bei finanzen.net ZERO sogar bis 23 Uhr handelbar (ohne Ordergebühren, zzgl. Spreads). Jetzt kostenlos Depot eröffnen und als Geschenk eine Gratisaktie erhalten.
Ausgewählte Hebelprodukte auf Ai
Mit Knock-outs können spekulative Anleger überproportional an Kursbewegungen partizipieren. Wählen Sie einfach den gewünschten Hebel und wir zeigen Ihnen passende Open-End Produkte auf Ai
Der Hebel muss zwischen 2 und 20 liegen
Name | Hebel | KO | Emittent |
---|
Name | Hebel | KO | Emittent |
---|
Quelle: Cointelegraph
Nachrichten zu Gap Inc.
Analysen zu Gap Inc.
Datum | Rating | Analyst | |
---|---|---|---|
21.11.2018 | Gap Neutral | B. Riley FBR | |
21.11.2018 | Gap Outperform | Telsey Advisory Group | |
19.10.2018 | Gap Buy | Standpoint Research | |
11.10.2018 | Gap Neutral | Wedbush Morgan Securities Inc. | |
24.08.2018 | Gap Neutral | B. Riley FBR |
Datum | Rating | Analyst | |
---|---|---|---|
21.11.2018 | Gap Outperform | Telsey Advisory Group | |
19.10.2018 | Gap Buy | Standpoint Research | |
15.05.2018 | Gap Outperform | Telsey Advisory Group | |
17.11.2017 | Gap Overweight | Barclays Capital | |
20.09.2017 | Gap Overweight | Barclays Capital |
Datum | Rating | Analyst | |
---|---|---|---|
21.11.2018 | Gap Neutral | B. Riley FBR | |
11.10.2018 | Gap Neutral | Wedbush Morgan Securities Inc. | |
24.08.2018 | Gap Neutral | B. Riley FBR | |
10.08.2018 | Gap Neutral | Wedbush Morgan Securities Inc. | |
02.03.2018 | Gap Neutral | B. Riley FBR, Inc. |
Datum | Rating | Analyst | |
---|---|---|---|
20.05.2016 | Gap Underperform | Mizuho | |
10.05.2016 | Gap Underperform | Wolfe Research | |
10.05.2016 | Gap Underperform | Mizuho | |
20.11.2015 | Gap Sell | UBS AG | |
20.11.2015 | Gap Underperform | Mizuho |
Um die Übersicht zu verbessern, haben Sie die Möglichkeit, die Analysen für Gap Inc. nach folgenden Kriterien zu filtern.
Alle: Alle Empfehlungen