Intuitive Surgical vs. Stryker: Which MedTech Stock Has More Upside?

24.12.25 13:02 Uhr

Werte in diesem Artikel
Aktien

489,40 EUR -4,35 EUR -0,88%

301,70 EUR -1,80 EUR -0,59%

Indizes

PKT PKT

25.586,9 PKT -0,9 PKT 0,00%

23.548,6 PKT -13,3 PKT -0,06%

6.919,6 PKT 9,8 PKT 0,14%

Intuitive Surgical ISRG and Stryker SYK are two of the most influential players in global MedTech, each benefiting from long-term procedural growth, hospital technology adoption and favorable demographic trends. While both companies participate in surgical innovation, their business models and exposure to robotics differ meaningfully. This faceoff evaluates which stock offers greater upside potential today, with a focus on growth leverage, revenue visibility and strategic positioning.Core Business FocusIntuitive Surgical is a pure-play leader in robotic-assisted soft-tissue surgery. The company’s da Vinci platform is its foundational asset, supporting procedures across urology, gynecology, general surgery, thoracic and colorectal indications. Management emphasized that Intuitive Surgical currently supports more than 10,800 installed da Vinci systems globally, with procedure volumes exceeding 20% growth in recent quarters, underscoring the platform’s central role in modern minimally invasive surgery.Stryker operates a diversified MedTech portfolio spanning orthopedic implants, surgical instruments, endoscopy, neurotechnology and medical devices. Robotics plays a meaningful but smaller role through the Mako system, which is focused on joint replacement procedures, such as knees and hips. Management consistently highlighted strength across multiple segments, reinforcing Stryker’s identity as a broad-based surgical solutions provider rather than a robotics pure play.Robotics ExposureRobotics is Intuitive Surgical’s core growth engine. The da Vinci ecosystem generates recurring, high-margin revenue through instruments and accessories tied directly to procedure volumes. Management cited 85% of total revenues coming from recurring sources, with utilization rising across multiport, SP and Ion platforms. Surgeon training, embedded workflows, and continuous platform upgrades, such as da Vinci 5, create high switching costs and a durable competitive moat.Robotics is one pillar within Stryker’s broader portfolio. Mako remains a strong franchise, with management noting more than 2 million robotic procedures performed and record installation in the last two quarters. However, Mako’s scope is largely limited to orthopedic applications, with growth closely tied to implant sales rather than a standalone robotics ecosystem.We note that ISRG offers concentrated exposure to surgical robotics as a secular growth driver, while SYK provides diversified robotics participation embedded within a multi-category portfolio.Revenue Model & VisibilityIntuitive Surgical operates a classic razor-and-blade model. System placements drive long-term demand for instruments, accessories and service contracts. Management reported recurring revenue growth of over 20% in the last two reported quarters, supported by procedure growth and rising utilization. Pro forma operating margins remained near 39%, reflecting strong operating leverage as volumes scale.Stryker’s revenue mix includes capital equipment, implants, and consumables across multiple specialties. While margins are lower than ISRG’s, management highlighted consistent gross and operating margin expansion driven by pricing initiatives, manufacturing efficiency, and scale benefits. This diversification provides resilience across procedure cycles but limits pure-play operating leverage.ISRG Revenue EstimatesImage Source: Zacks Investment ResearchSYK Revenue EstimatesImage Source: Zacks Investment ResearchGrowth ProfileManagement continues to frame Intuitive Surgical’s opportunity as multi-dimensional — deeper penetration of general surgery, expansion of SP and Ion platforms, and geographic growth in markets such as India, Korea, and distributor regions. Procedure growth remained in the high-teens to 20% range, supporting a faster long-term growth profile but with higher sensitivity to procedural trends and capital budgets.Stryker’s growth profile is steadier. Organic sales growth has consistently tracked high single digits to low double digits, supported by aging demographics, elective procedure recovery and broad product launches. Notably, growth is diversified across multiple platforms, mitigating volatility while simultaneously limiting upside relative to a robotics pure-play model.ISRG Earnings EstimatesImage Source: Zacks Investment ResearchSYK Earnings EstimatesImage Source: Zacks Investment ResearchPrice Performance & Valuation of ISRG & SYKOver the past year, Intuitive Surgical has gained 7.5% against the Stryker’s decline of 4.3%.Image Source: Zacks Investment ResearchSYK looks more attractive than ISRG from a valuation standpoint. Going by the price/earnings ratio, Stryker’s shares currently trade at 23.7 forward earnings, significantly lower than Intuitive Surgical’s 60.45.Image Source: Zacks Investment ResearchRisk FactorsKey risks for Intuitive Surgical include valuation sensitivity, increasing competition in surgical robotics, and potential hospital capital spending slowdowns — particularly internationally, where management cited budget pressures in Japan, China and parts of Europe.Stryker faces slower relative robotics innovation compared with pure-play peers, pricing pressure in orthopedics, and execution risk from ongoing acquisitions and integrations, including Inari Medical.Bottom LineBoth companies are high-quality MedTech leaders, but their upside profiles diverge. Stryker’s diversification, consistent execution, and margin discipline make it a defensive compounder well-suited for stability-oriented investors.However, Intuitive Surgical offers greater upside potential today, driven by its concentrated robotics exposure, structurally higher margins, recurring revenue visibility, and long-term leverage to procedure growth and platform innovation. While ISRG carries higher sensitivity to valuation and capital cycles, management’s commentary underscores a durable growth runway that remains compelling relative to Stryker’s more balanced (but inherently capped) growth profile.Meanwhile, Intuitive Surgical carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) and Stryker has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.Zacks Naming Top 10 Stocks for 2026Want to be tipped off early to our 10 top picks for the entirety of 2026? History suggests their performance could be sensational.From 2012 (when our Director of Research Sheraz Mian assumed responsibility for the portfolio) through November, 2025, the Zacks Top 10 Stocks gained +2,530.8%, more than QUADRUPLING the S&P 500’s +570.3%.Now Sheraz is combing through 4,400 companies to handpick the best 10 tickers to buy and hold in 2026. Don’t miss your chance to get in on these stocks when they’re released on January 5. Be First to New Top 10 Stocks >>Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Stryker Corporation (SYK): Free Stock Analysis Report Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG): Free Stock Analysis ReportThis article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).Zacks Investment ResearchWeiter zum vollständigen Artikel bei Zacks

In eigener Sache

Übrigens: Intuitive Surgical und andere US-Aktien sind bei finanzen.net ZERO sogar bis 23 Uhr handelbar (ohne Ordergebühren, zzgl. Spreads). Jetzt kostenlos Depot eröffnen und Neukunden-Bonus sichern!

Ausgewählte Hebelprodukte auf Intuitive Surgical

Mit Knock-outs können spekulative Anleger überproportional an Kursbewegungen partizipieren. Wählen Sie einfach den gewünschten Hebel und wir zeigen Ihnen passende Open-End Produkte auf Intuitive Surgical

NameHebelKOEmittent
NameHebelKOEmittent
Wer­bung

Quelle: Zacks

Nachrichten zu Stryker Corp.

Wer­bung

Analysen zu Stryker Corp.

DatumRatingAnalyst
30.01.2019Stryker BuyCanaccord Adams
03.01.2019Stryker BuyDeutsche Bank AG
16.10.2018Stryker OverweightBarclays Capital
16.08.2018Stryker BuyBTIG Research
27.04.2018Stryker BuyCanaccord Adams
DatumRatingAnalyst
30.01.2019Stryker BuyCanaccord Adams
03.01.2019Stryker BuyDeutsche Bank AG
16.10.2018Stryker OverweightBarclays Capital
16.08.2018Stryker BuyBTIG Research
27.04.2018Stryker BuyCanaccord Adams
DatumRatingAnalyst
05.01.2018Stryker NeutralCantor Fitzgerald
25.08.2017Stryker HoldNeedham & Company, LLC
30.06.2017Stryker NeutralCantor Fitzgerald
06.01.2017Stryker UnderperformNeedham & Company, LLC
13.04.2016Stryker NeutralRobert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated
DatumRatingAnalyst
27.10.2017Stryker UnderweightBarclays Capital
11.04.2016Stryker UnderweightBarclays Capital
18.12.2015Stryker UnderperformBMO Capital Markets
02.04.2015Stryker UnderweightBarclays Capital
03.05.2010Stryker "underweight"Barclays Capital

Um die Übersicht zu verbessern, haben Sie die Möglichkeit, die Analysen für Stryker Corp. nach folgenden Kriterien zu filtern.

Alle: Alle Empfehlungen

Buy: Kaufempfehlungen wie z.B. "kaufen" oder "buy"
Hold: Halten-Empfehlungen wie z.B. "halten" oder "neutral"
Sell: Verkaufsempfehlungn wie z.B. "verkaufen" oder "reduce"
mehr Analysen