Quantum Computers No Match For Bitcoin’s Math, Google Expert Says
Werte in diesem Artikel
Microsoft has recently rolled out a chip called Majorana 1 that its engineers say could point the way to building quantum computers with the scale people once only imagined.Google and IBM have also posted progress updates in recent months, and some in crypto called the news alarming.But Graham Cooke, a Google veteran-turned blockchain CEO, pushed back on the panic, saying “Your wallet’s math is stronger than the fabric of spacetime itself.”Majorana 1 And The Million Qubit ClaimMicrosoft says Majorana 1 uses a new class of material — a “topoconductor” — and an architecture meant to make qubits more stable and easier to scale toward a million-qubit device.The company frames the chip as a step toward practical, fault-tolerant quantum machines that could handle very large problems.That kind of scale is what makes some people worry about cryptography, because certain quantum algorithms work very differently from the classical math that protects keys today.Microsoft built a 1-million-qubit quantum computer.Bitcoin holders are panicking—this could crack crypto encryption.But your seed phrase has 340,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 combinations.Here’s why quantum still can’t touch it: pic.twitter.com/kiI5oIXej1— GC Cooke (@GCcookeHQ) August 11, 2025Google’s Willow And IBM RoadmapsBased on reports, Google’s Willow chip and IBM’s public roadmap have added fuel to the conversation. Google showed a chip that it says solved a benchmark task in under five minutes that, by their measure, would take a classical supercomputer roughly 10 septillion years.IBM has published plans for staged systems — Starling and later Blue Jay — to push toward many logical qubits and extensive error correction over the next several years.Those announcements mean companies are getting closer to solving long-standing engineering problems, but they do not equal an instant ability to undo modern cryptography.Why Bitcoin Isn’t Facing A Panic Right NowCryptography experts point out that breaking Bitcoin’s elliptic-curve keys needs not just more physical qubits but stable, error-corrected logical qubits and huge run-times.Estimates vary widely, but respected analysis has shown that breaking a 256-bit elliptic curve in a practical time window would require millions or at least many hundreds of thousands of physical qubits once error correction is counted.In short: the path from a lab milestone to a machine that can target Bitcoin addresses at scale still runs through a lot of hard engineering.A 24-word seed phrase?That’s 340 septillion trillion MORE combinations than a 12-word phrase.We’re approaching 10^77 possibilities – nearly as many as atoms in the observable universe (10^80):— GC Cooke (@GCcookeHQ) August 11, 2025Seed Phrases And Dizzying NumbersBased on reports and public comments from practitioners, wallet math is not the whole story but it matters.Cooke has stressed how large a 24-word seed phrase keyspace is compared with a 12-word phrase, and he used big-picture comparisons — like saying the universe’s age of 14 billion years and “a trillion trillion” restarts — to show how vast those numbers are.Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingViewWeiter zum vollständigen Artikel bei NewsBTC
Übrigens: Alphabet A (ex Google) und andere US-Aktien sind bei finanzen.net ZERO sogar bis 23 Uhr handelbar (ohne Ordergebühren, zzgl. Spreads). Jetzt kostenlos Depot eröffnen und Neukunden-Bonus sichern!
Ausgewählte Hebelprodukte auf Alphabet A (ex Google)
Mit Knock-outs können spekulative Anleger überproportional an Kursbewegungen partizipieren. Wählen Sie einfach den gewünschten Hebel und wir zeigen Ihnen passende Open-End Produkte auf Alphabet A (ex Google)
Der Hebel muss zwischen 2 und 20 liegen
Name | Hebel | KO | Emittent |
---|
Name | Hebel | KO | Emittent |
---|
Quelle: NewsBTC
Nachrichten zu Alphabet A (ex Google)
Analysen zu Alphabet A (ex Google)
Datum | Rating | Analyst | |
---|---|---|---|
03.09.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Neutral | UBS AG | |
03.09.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Overweight | JP Morgan Chase & Co. | |
03.09.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Outperform | RBC Capital Markets | |
14.08.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Neutral | UBS AG | |
28.07.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Overweight | JP Morgan Chase & Co. |
Datum | Rating | Analyst | |
---|---|---|---|
03.09.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Overweight | JP Morgan Chase & Co. | |
03.09.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Outperform | RBC Capital Markets | |
28.07.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Overweight | JP Morgan Chase & Co. | |
24.07.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Outperform | RBC Capital Markets | |
24.07.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Buy | Jefferies & Company Inc. |
Datum | Rating | Analyst | |
---|---|---|---|
03.09.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Neutral | UBS AG | |
14.08.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Neutral | UBS AG | |
24.07.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Neutral | UBS AG | |
16.07.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Neutral | UBS AG | |
22.05.2025 | Alphabet A (ex Google) Neutral | UBS AG |
Datum | Rating | Analyst | |
---|---|---|---|
15.05.2019 | Alphabet A (ex Google) verkaufen | Credit Suisse Group | |
24.11.2008 | Google sell | Merriman Curhan Ford & Co | |
19.11.2008 | Google ausgestoppt | Nasd@q Inside | |
16.03.2007 | Google Bär der Woche | Der Aktionärsbrief | |
08.03.2006 | Google im intakten Abwärtstrend | Der Aktionär |
Um die Übersicht zu verbessern, haben Sie die Möglichkeit, die Analysen für Alphabet A (ex Google) nach folgenden Kriterien zu filtern.
Alle: Alle Empfehlungen